Loading…
Adapting an Australian question prompt list in oncology to a Norwegian setting—a combined method approach
Purpose A question prompt list (QPL) is an inexpensive communication aid that has been proved effective in encouraging patients to ask questions during medical consultations. The aim of this project was to develop a QPL for Norwegian cancer patients. Methods A multimethod approach was chosen combini...
Saved in:
Published in: | Supportive care in cancer 2017, Vol.25 (1), p.51-58 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-cc82582244debe9593bcfc20998e7f293bc79b16d88d22205f79e378d667d20e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-cc82582244debe9593bcfc20998e7f293bc79b16d88d22205f79e378d667d20e3 |
container_end_page | 58 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 51 |
container_title | Supportive care in cancer |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Amundsen, Anita Ervik, Bente Butow, Phyllis Tattersall, Martin H. N. Bergvik, Svein Sørlie, Tore Nordøy, Tone |
description | Purpose
A question prompt list (QPL) is an inexpensive communication aid that has been proved effective in encouraging patients to ask questions during medical consultations. The aim of this project was to develop a QPL for Norwegian cancer patients.
Methods
A multimethod approach was chosen combining literature review, focus groups, and a survey in the process of culturally adjusting an Australian QPL for the Norwegian setting. Participants were recruited from the University Hospital of North Norway. They were asked to review and comment on iterative drafts of the QPL.
Results
Eighteen patients, mean age 54, participated in the focus groups, and 31 patients, mean age 55, participated in the survey. Focus groups suggested that topics related to accompanying relatives, children as next of kin, and rehabilitation were important and should be added to the original QPL. The survey revealed that most questions from the original QPL were considered both useful and understandable. Although half of the patients found some questions about prognosis unpleasant, the vast majority considered the same questions useful. Questions regarding clinical studies, multidisciplinary teams, and public versus private hospitals had lower ratings of usefulness.
Conclusion
QPLs require some adjustment to the local cultural context, and a mixed method approach may provide a useful model for future cultural adaptation of QPLs. The present QPL has been adjusted to the needs of oncology patients in the Norwegian health care setting. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00520-016-3380-2 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1845254543</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A472185078</galeid><sourcerecordid>A472185078</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-cc82582244debe9593bcfc20998e7f293bc79b16d88d22205f79e378d667d20e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctu1TAURS0EopcLH8AEWWLSSYqfsTO8qnhJFUxgbDn2SeqS2CFOhDrjI_jCfgkOKQghIQ_8Wnv7-GyEnlNyQQlRrzIhkpGK0LriXJOKPUAHKjivFOfNQ3QgjaCV4FKeoSc53xBClZLsMTpjSvKGcn5AX07eTkuIPbYRn9a8zHYIZfl1hbyEFPE0p3Fa8BDygkPEKbo0pP4WLwlb_CHN36Df-AzL5nL3_YfFLo1tiODxCMt18thOxcS666foUWeHDM_u5yP6_Ob1p8t31dXHt-8vT1eVE5QulXOaSc2YEB5aaGTDW9c5RppGg-rYtlVNS2uvtWeMEdmpBrjSvq6VZwT4EZ3vvuXZX_8wY8gOhsFGSGs2VAvJpJClU0f08h_0Jq1zLNVtlJCS1IIW6mKnejuACbFLpU2uDA9jcClCF8r5SShGtSRKFwHdBW5OOc_QmWkOo51vDSVmi87s0ZkSndmiM6xoXtyXsrYj-D-K31kVgO1ALlexh_mvWv_r-hOh_6RS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1844550641</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Adapting an Australian question prompt list in oncology to a Norwegian setting—a combined method approach</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Amundsen, Anita ; Ervik, Bente ; Butow, Phyllis ; Tattersall, Martin H. N. ; Bergvik, Svein ; Sørlie, Tore ; Nordøy, Tone</creator><creatorcontrib>Amundsen, Anita ; Ervik, Bente ; Butow, Phyllis ; Tattersall, Martin H. N. ; Bergvik, Svein ; Sørlie, Tore ; Nordøy, Tone</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
A question prompt list (QPL) is an inexpensive communication aid that has been proved effective in encouraging patients to ask questions during medical consultations. The aim of this project was to develop a QPL for Norwegian cancer patients.
Methods
A multimethod approach was chosen combining literature review, focus groups, and a survey in the process of culturally adjusting an Australian QPL for the Norwegian setting. Participants were recruited from the University Hospital of North Norway. They were asked to review and comment on iterative drafts of the QPL.
Results
Eighteen patients, mean age 54, participated in the focus groups, and 31 patients, mean age 55, participated in the survey. Focus groups suggested that topics related to accompanying relatives, children as next of kin, and rehabilitation were important and should be added to the original QPL. The survey revealed that most questions from the original QPL were considered both useful and understandable. Although half of the patients found some questions about prognosis unpleasant, the vast majority considered the same questions useful. Questions regarding clinical studies, multidisciplinary teams, and public versus private hospitals had lower ratings of usefulness.
Conclusion
QPLs require some adjustment to the local cultural context, and a mixed method approach may provide a useful model for future cultural adaptation of QPLs. The present QPL has been adjusted to the needs of oncology patients in the Norwegian health care setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0941-4355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-7339</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00520-016-3380-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27539133</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Analysis ; Australia ; Cancer ; Communication ; Female ; Focus Groups ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Male ; Medical Oncology - standards ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Norway ; Nursing ; Nursing Research ; Oncology ; Original Article ; Pain Medicine ; Patient Participation ; Questions ; Rehabilitation Medicine ; Surveys ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Supportive care in cancer, 2017, Vol.25 (1), p.51-58</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Springer</rights><rights>Supportive Care in Cancer is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-cc82582244debe9593bcfc20998e7f293bc79b16d88d22205f79e378d667d20e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-cc82582244debe9593bcfc20998e7f293bc79b16d88d22205f79e378d667d20e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0068-1358</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1844550641/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1844550641?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21394,21395,27924,27925,33611,33612,34530,34531,43733,44115,74221,74639</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27539133$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Amundsen, Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ervik, Bente</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butow, Phyllis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tattersall, Martin H. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergvik, Svein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sørlie, Tore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordøy, Tone</creatorcontrib><title>Adapting an Australian question prompt list in oncology to a Norwegian setting—a combined method approach</title><title>Supportive care in cancer</title><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><description>Purpose
A question prompt list (QPL) is an inexpensive communication aid that has been proved effective in encouraging patients to ask questions during medical consultations. The aim of this project was to develop a QPL for Norwegian cancer patients.
Methods
A multimethod approach was chosen combining literature review, focus groups, and a survey in the process of culturally adjusting an Australian QPL for the Norwegian setting. Participants were recruited from the University Hospital of North Norway. They were asked to review and comment on iterative drafts of the QPL.
Results
Eighteen patients, mean age 54, participated in the focus groups, and 31 patients, mean age 55, participated in the survey. Focus groups suggested that topics related to accompanying relatives, children as next of kin, and rehabilitation were important and should be added to the original QPL. The survey revealed that most questions from the original QPL were considered both useful and understandable. Although half of the patients found some questions about prognosis unpleasant, the vast majority considered the same questions useful. Questions regarding clinical studies, multidisciplinary teams, and public versus private hospitals had lower ratings of usefulness.
Conclusion
QPLs require some adjustment to the local cultural context, and a mixed method approach may provide a useful model for future cultural adaptation of QPLs. The present QPL has been adjusted to the needs of oncology patients in the Norwegian health care setting.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Oncology - standards</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Norway</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Research</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Patient Participation</subject><subject>Questions</subject><subject>Rehabilitation Medicine</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0941-4355</issn><issn>1433-7339</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctu1TAURS0EopcLH8AEWWLSSYqfsTO8qnhJFUxgbDn2SeqS2CFOhDrjI_jCfgkOKQghIQ_8Wnv7-GyEnlNyQQlRrzIhkpGK0LriXJOKPUAHKjivFOfNQ3QgjaCV4FKeoSc53xBClZLsMTpjSvKGcn5AX07eTkuIPbYRn9a8zHYIZfl1hbyEFPE0p3Fa8BDygkPEKbo0pP4WLwlb_CHN36Df-AzL5nL3_YfFLo1tiODxCMt18thOxcS666foUWeHDM_u5yP6_Ob1p8t31dXHt-8vT1eVE5QulXOaSc2YEB5aaGTDW9c5RppGg-rYtlVNS2uvtWeMEdmpBrjSvq6VZwT4EZ3vvuXZX_8wY8gOhsFGSGs2VAvJpJClU0f08h_0Jq1zLNVtlJCS1IIW6mKnejuACbFLpU2uDA9jcClCF8r5SShGtSRKFwHdBW5OOc_QmWkOo51vDSVmi87s0ZkSndmiM6xoXtyXsrYj-D-K31kVgO1ALlexh_mvWv_r-hOh_6RS</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Amundsen, Anita</creator><creator>Ervik, Bente</creator><creator>Butow, Phyllis</creator><creator>Tattersall, Martin H. N.</creator><creator>Bergvik, Svein</creator><creator>Sørlie, Tore</creator><creator>Nordøy, Tone</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0068-1358</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>Adapting an Australian question prompt list in oncology to a Norwegian setting—a combined method approach</title><author>Amundsen, Anita ; Ervik, Bente ; Butow, Phyllis ; Tattersall, Martin H. N. ; Bergvik, Svein ; Sørlie, Tore ; Nordøy, Tone</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-cc82582244debe9593bcfc20998e7f293bc79b16d88d22205f79e378d667d20e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Oncology - standards</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Norway</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Research</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Patient Participation</topic><topic>Questions</topic><topic>Rehabilitation Medicine</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Amundsen, Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ervik, Bente</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butow, Phyllis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tattersall, Martin H. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergvik, Svein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sørlie, Tore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordøy, Tone</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Amundsen, Anita</au><au>Ervik, Bente</au><au>Butow, Phyllis</au><au>Tattersall, Martin H. N.</au><au>Bergvik, Svein</au><au>Sørlie, Tore</au><au>Nordøy, Tone</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Adapting an Australian question prompt list in oncology to a Norwegian setting—a combined method approach</atitle><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle><stitle>Support Care Cancer</stitle><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>51</spage><epage>58</epage><pages>51-58</pages><issn>0941-4355</issn><eissn>1433-7339</eissn><abstract>Purpose
A question prompt list (QPL) is an inexpensive communication aid that has been proved effective in encouraging patients to ask questions during medical consultations. The aim of this project was to develop a QPL for Norwegian cancer patients.
Methods
A multimethod approach was chosen combining literature review, focus groups, and a survey in the process of culturally adjusting an Australian QPL for the Norwegian setting. Participants were recruited from the University Hospital of North Norway. They were asked to review and comment on iterative drafts of the QPL.
Results
Eighteen patients, mean age 54, participated in the focus groups, and 31 patients, mean age 55, participated in the survey. Focus groups suggested that topics related to accompanying relatives, children as next of kin, and rehabilitation were important and should be added to the original QPL. The survey revealed that most questions from the original QPL were considered both useful and understandable. Although half of the patients found some questions about prognosis unpleasant, the vast majority considered the same questions useful. Questions regarding clinical studies, multidisciplinary teams, and public versus private hospitals had lower ratings of usefulness.
Conclusion
QPLs require some adjustment to the local cultural context, and a mixed method approach may provide a useful model for future cultural adaptation of QPLs. The present QPL has been adjusted to the needs of oncology patients in the Norwegian health care setting.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>27539133</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00520-016-3380-2</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0068-1358</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0941-4355 |
ispartof | Supportive care in cancer, 2017, Vol.25 (1), p.51-58 |
issn | 0941-4355 1433-7339 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1845254543 |
source | Social Science Premium Collection; Sociology Collection; Springer Link |
subjects | Adult Aged Analysis Australia Cancer Communication Female Focus Groups Hospitals Humans Male Medical Oncology - standards Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Norway Nursing Nursing Research Oncology Original Article Pain Medicine Patient Participation Questions Rehabilitation Medicine Surveys Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | Adapting an Australian question prompt list in oncology to a Norwegian setting—a combined method approach |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T21%3A28%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Adapting%20an%20Australian%20question%20prompt%20list%20in%20oncology%20to%20a%20Norwegian%20setting%E2%80%94a%20combined%20method%20approach&rft.jtitle=Supportive%20care%20in%20cancer&rft.au=Amundsen,%20Anita&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=51&rft.epage=58&rft.pages=51-58&rft.issn=0941-4355&rft.eissn=1433-7339&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00520-016-3380-2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA472185078%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-cc82582244debe9593bcfc20998e7f293bc79b16d88d22205f79e378d667d20e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1844550641&rft_id=info:pmid/27539133&rft_galeid=A472185078&rfr_iscdi=true |