Loading…

Adapting an Australian question prompt list in oncology to a Norwegian setting—a combined method approach

Purpose A question prompt list (QPL) is an inexpensive communication aid that has been proved effective in encouraging patients to ask questions during medical consultations. The aim of this project was to develop a QPL for Norwegian cancer patients. Methods A multimethod approach was chosen combini...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Supportive care in cancer 2017, Vol.25 (1), p.51-58
Main Authors: Amundsen, Anita, Ervik, Bente, Butow, Phyllis, Tattersall, Martin H. N., Bergvik, Svein, Sørlie, Tore, Nordøy, Tone
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-cc82582244debe9593bcfc20998e7f293bc79b16d88d22205f79e378d667d20e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-cc82582244debe9593bcfc20998e7f293bc79b16d88d22205f79e378d667d20e3
container_end_page 58
container_issue 1
container_start_page 51
container_title Supportive care in cancer
container_volume 25
creator Amundsen, Anita
Ervik, Bente
Butow, Phyllis
Tattersall, Martin H. N.
Bergvik, Svein
Sørlie, Tore
Nordøy, Tone
description Purpose A question prompt list (QPL) is an inexpensive communication aid that has been proved effective in encouraging patients to ask questions during medical consultations. The aim of this project was to develop a QPL for Norwegian cancer patients. Methods A multimethod approach was chosen combining literature review, focus groups, and a survey in the process of culturally adjusting an Australian QPL for the Norwegian setting. Participants were recruited from the University Hospital of North Norway. They were asked to review and comment on iterative drafts of the QPL. Results Eighteen patients, mean age 54, participated in the focus groups, and 31 patients, mean age 55, participated in the survey. Focus groups suggested that topics related to accompanying relatives, children as next of kin, and rehabilitation were important and should be added to the original QPL. The survey revealed that most questions from the original QPL were considered both useful and understandable. Although half of the patients found some questions about prognosis unpleasant, the vast majority considered the same questions useful. Questions regarding clinical studies, multidisciplinary teams, and public versus private hospitals had lower ratings of usefulness. Conclusion QPLs require some adjustment to the local cultural context, and a mixed method approach may provide a useful model for future cultural adaptation of QPLs. The present QPL has been adjusted to the needs of oncology patients in the Norwegian health care setting.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00520-016-3380-2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1845254543</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A472185078</galeid><sourcerecordid>A472185078</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-cc82582244debe9593bcfc20998e7f293bc79b16d88d22205f79e378d667d20e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctu1TAURS0EopcLH8AEWWLSSYqfsTO8qnhJFUxgbDn2SeqS2CFOhDrjI_jCfgkOKQghIQ_8Wnv7-GyEnlNyQQlRrzIhkpGK0LriXJOKPUAHKjivFOfNQ3QgjaCV4FKeoSc53xBClZLsMTpjSvKGcn5AX07eTkuIPbYRn9a8zHYIZfl1hbyEFPE0p3Fa8BDygkPEKbo0pP4WLwlb_CHN36Df-AzL5nL3_YfFLo1tiODxCMt18thOxcS666foUWeHDM_u5yP6_Ob1p8t31dXHt-8vT1eVE5QulXOaSc2YEB5aaGTDW9c5RppGg-rYtlVNS2uvtWeMEdmpBrjSvq6VZwT4EZ3vvuXZX_8wY8gOhsFGSGs2VAvJpJClU0f08h_0Jq1zLNVtlJCS1IIW6mKnejuACbFLpU2uDA9jcClCF8r5SShGtSRKFwHdBW5OOc_QmWkOo51vDSVmi87s0ZkSndmiM6xoXtyXsrYj-D-K31kVgO1ALlexh_mvWv_r-hOh_6RS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1844550641</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Adapting an Australian question prompt list in oncology to a Norwegian setting—a combined method approach</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Amundsen, Anita ; Ervik, Bente ; Butow, Phyllis ; Tattersall, Martin H. N. ; Bergvik, Svein ; Sørlie, Tore ; Nordøy, Tone</creator><creatorcontrib>Amundsen, Anita ; Ervik, Bente ; Butow, Phyllis ; Tattersall, Martin H. N. ; Bergvik, Svein ; Sørlie, Tore ; Nordøy, Tone</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose A question prompt list (QPL) is an inexpensive communication aid that has been proved effective in encouraging patients to ask questions during medical consultations. The aim of this project was to develop a QPL for Norwegian cancer patients. Methods A multimethod approach was chosen combining literature review, focus groups, and a survey in the process of culturally adjusting an Australian QPL for the Norwegian setting. Participants were recruited from the University Hospital of North Norway. They were asked to review and comment on iterative drafts of the QPL. Results Eighteen patients, mean age 54, participated in the focus groups, and 31 patients, mean age 55, participated in the survey. Focus groups suggested that topics related to accompanying relatives, children as next of kin, and rehabilitation were important and should be added to the original QPL. The survey revealed that most questions from the original QPL were considered both useful and understandable. Although half of the patients found some questions about prognosis unpleasant, the vast majority considered the same questions useful. Questions regarding clinical studies, multidisciplinary teams, and public versus private hospitals had lower ratings of usefulness. Conclusion QPLs require some adjustment to the local cultural context, and a mixed method approach may provide a useful model for future cultural adaptation of QPLs. The present QPL has been adjusted to the needs of oncology patients in the Norwegian health care setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0941-4355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-7339</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00520-016-3380-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27539133</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Analysis ; Australia ; Cancer ; Communication ; Female ; Focus Groups ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Male ; Medical Oncology - standards ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Norway ; Nursing ; Nursing Research ; Oncology ; Original Article ; Pain Medicine ; Patient Participation ; Questions ; Rehabilitation Medicine ; Surveys ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Supportive care in cancer, 2017, Vol.25 (1), p.51-58</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Springer</rights><rights>Supportive Care in Cancer is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-cc82582244debe9593bcfc20998e7f293bc79b16d88d22205f79e378d667d20e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-cc82582244debe9593bcfc20998e7f293bc79b16d88d22205f79e378d667d20e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0068-1358</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1844550641/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1844550641?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21394,21395,27924,27925,33611,33612,34530,34531,43733,44115,74221,74639</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27539133$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Amundsen, Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ervik, Bente</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butow, Phyllis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tattersall, Martin H. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergvik, Svein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sørlie, Tore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordøy, Tone</creatorcontrib><title>Adapting an Australian question prompt list in oncology to a Norwegian setting—a combined method approach</title><title>Supportive care in cancer</title><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><description>Purpose A question prompt list (QPL) is an inexpensive communication aid that has been proved effective in encouraging patients to ask questions during medical consultations. The aim of this project was to develop a QPL for Norwegian cancer patients. Methods A multimethod approach was chosen combining literature review, focus groups, and a survey in the process of culturally adjusting an Australian QPL for the Norwegian setting. Participants were recruited from the University Hospital of North Norway. They were asked to review and comment on iterative drafts of the QPL. Results Eighteen patients, mean age 54, participated in the focus groups, and 31 patients, mean age 55, participated in the survey. Focus groups suggested that topics related to accompanying relatives, children as next of kin, and rehabilitation were important and should be added to the original QPL. The survey revealed that most questions from the original QPL were considered both useful and understandable. Although half of the patients found some questions about prognosis unpleasant, the vast majority considered the same questions useful. Questions regarding clinical studies, multidisciplinary teams, and public versus private hospitals had lower ratings of usefulness. Conclusion QPLs require some adjustment to the local cultural context, and a mixed method approach may provide a useful model for future cultural adaptation of QPLs. The present QPL has been adjusted to the needs of oncology patients in the Norwegian health care setting.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Oncology - standards</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Norway</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Research</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Patient Participation</subject><subject>Questions</subject><subject>Rehabilitation Medicine</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0941-4355</issn><issn>1433-7339</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctu1TAURS0EopcLH8AEWWLSSYqfsTO8qnhJFUxgbDn2SeqS2CFOhDrjI_jCfgkOKQghIQ_8Wnv7-GyEnlNyQQlRrzIhkpGK0LriXJOKPUAHKjivFOfNQ3QgjaCV4FKeoSc53xBClZLsMTpjSvKGcn5AX07eTkuIPbYRn9a8zHYIZfl1hbyEFPE0p3Fa8BDygkPEKbo0pP4WLwlb_CHN36Df-AzL5nL3_YfFLo1tiODxCMt18thOxcS666foUWeHDM_u5yP6_Ob1p8t31dXHt-8vT1eVE5QulXOaSc2YEB5aaGTDW9c5RppGg-rYtlVNS2uvtWeMEdmpBrjSvq6VZwT4EZ3vvuXZX_8wY8gOhsFGSGs2VAvJpJClU0f08h_0Jq1zLNVtlJCS1IIW6mKnejuACbFLpU2uDA9jcClCF8r5SShGtSRKFwHdBW5OOc_QmWkOo51vDSVmi87s0ZkSndmiM6xoXtyXsrYj-D-K31kVgO1ALlexh_mvWv_r-hOh_6RS</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Amundsen, Anita</creator><creator>Ervik, Bente</creator><creator>Butow, Phyllis</creator><creator>Tattersall, Martin H. N.</creator><creator>Bergvik, Svein</creator><creator>Sørlie, Tore</creator><creator>Nordøy, Tone</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0068-1358</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>Adapting an Australian question prompt list in oncology to a Norwegian setting—a combined method approach</title><author>Amundsen, Anita ; Ervik, Bente ; Butow, Phyllis ; Tattersall, Martin H. N. ; Bergvik, Svein ; Sørlie, Tore ; Nordøy, Tone</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-cc82582244debe9593bcfc20998e7f293bc79b16d88d22205f79e378d667d20e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Oncology - standards</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Norway</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Research</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Patient Participation</topic><topic>Questions</topic><topic>Rehabilitation Medicine</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Amundsen, Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ervik, Bente</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butow, Phyllis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tattersall, Martin H. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergvik, Svein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sørlie, Tore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordøy, Tone</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Amundsen, Anita</au><au>Ervik, Bente</au><au>Butow, Phyllis</au><au>Tattersall, Martin H. N.</au><au>Bergvik, Svein</au><au>Sørlie, Tore</au><au>Nordøy, Tone</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Adapting an Australian question prompt list in oncology to a Norwegian setting—a combined method approach</atitle><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle><stitle>Support Care Cancer</stitle><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>51</spage><epage>58</epage><pages>51-58</pages><issn>0941-4355</issn><eissn>1433-7339</eissn><abstract>Purpose A question prompt list (QPL) is an inexpensive communication aid that has been proved effective in encouraging patients to ask questions during medical consultations. The aim of this project was to develop a QPL for Norwegian cancer patients. Methods A multimethod approach was chosen combining literature review, focus groups, and a survey in the process of culturally adjusting an Australian QPL for the Norwegian setting. Participants were recruited from the University Hospital of North Norway. They were asked to review and comment on iterative drafts of the QPL. Results Eighteen patients, mean age 54, participated in the focus groups, and 31 patients, mean age 55, participated in the survey. Focus groups suggested that topics related to accompanying relatives, children as next of kin, and rehabilitation were important and should be added to the original QPL. The survey revealed that most questions from the original QPL were considered both useful and understandable. Although half of the patients found some questions about prognosis unpleasant, the vast majority considered the same questions useful. Questions regarding clinical studies, multidisciplinary teams, and public versus private hospitals had lower ratings of usefulness. Conclusion QPLs require some adjustment to the local cultural context, and a mixed method approach may provide a useful model for future cultural adaptation of QPLs. The present QPL has been adjusted to the needs of oncology patients in the Norwegian health care setting.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>27539133</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00520-016-3380-2</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0068-1358</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0941-4355
ispartof Supportive care in cancer, 2017, Vol.25 (1), p.51-58
issn 0941-4355
1433-7339
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1845254543
source Social Science Premium Collection; Sociology Collection; Springer Link
subjects Adult
Aged
Analysis
Australia
Cancer
Communication
Female
Focus Groups
Hospitals
Humans
Male
Medical Oncology - standards
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Norway
Nursing
Nursing Research
Oncology
Original Article
Pain Medicine
Patient Participation
Questions
Rehabilitation Medicine
Surveys
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Adapting an Australian question prompt list in oncology to a Norwegian setting—a combined method approach
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T21%3A28%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Adapting%20an%20Australian%20question%20prompt%20list%20in%20oncology%20to%20a%20Norwegian%20setting%E2%80%94a%20combined%20method%20approach&rft.jtitle=Supportive%20care%20in%20cancer&rft.au=Amundsen,%20Anita&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=51&rft.epage=58&rft.pages=51-58&rft.issn=0941-4355&rft.eissn=1433-7339&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00520-016-3380-2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA472185078%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-cc82582244debe9593bcfc20998e7f293bc79b16d88d22205f79e378d667d20e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1844550641&rft_id=info:pmid/27539133&rft_galeid=A472185078&rfr_iscdi=true