Loading…
Different configuration of socket shield technique in peri-implant bone preservation: An experimental study in dog mandible
The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the residual root and peri implant bone dimensions on the clinical success of the socket shield technique. Thirty-six dental implants were installed in 6 dogs. The clinical crowns of teeth P3, P4 and M1 were beheaded. Afterwards, the roots were...
Saved in:
Published in: | Annals of anatomy 2016-11, Vol.208, p.109-115 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-38ab5eb7d2bb6ff02a495c87799b99534d9934b6208a6c24dd5fea510f21a51f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-38ab5eb7d2bb6ff02a495c87799b99534d9934b6208a6c24dd5fea510f21a51f3 |
container_end_page | 115 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 109 |
container_title | Annals of anatomy |
container_volume | 208 |
creator | Calvo-Guirado, José Luis Troiano, Miguel López-López, P.J. Ramírez-Fernandez, María Piedad de Val, José Eduardo Maté Sánchez Marin, Jose Manuel Granero Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre |
description | The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the residual root and peri implant bone dimensions on the clinical success of the socket shield technique.
Thirty-six dental implants were installed in 6 dogs. The clinical crowns of teeth P3, P4 and M1 were beheaded. Afterwards, the roots were worn down 2–3mm in apical direction until they were located at crestal level. Posterior implant beds were prepared in the center of the roots passing by 3mm apically forming 6 groups in accordance to the remaining root thickness. Radiography of the crestal bone level was performed on day 0 and after 12 weeks. Histomorphometric analyses of the specimens were carried out to measure the crestal bone level, the bone to implant contact and the buccal and lingual bone thickness at the implant shoulder portion. Correlations between groups were analyzed through nonparametric Friedman test, statistical significance was set as p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.aanat.2016.06.008 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1847879119</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0940960216301248</els_id><sourcerecordid>1847879119</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-38ab5eb7d2bb6ff02a495c87799b99534d9934b6208a6c24dd5fea510f21a51f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEuLFTEQhYMoznX0FwiSpZu-JulOuiO4GMYnDLjRdcijMpNrd9Im6cHBP2_u3NGlUFAUfKfq1EHoJSV7Sqh4c9hrHXXdszbsSSsyPUI7KujUkYGwx2hH5EA6KQg7Q89KORDSCy6Gp-iMjVxwxqYd-v0-eA8ZYsU2RR-ut6xrSBEnj0uyP6DichNgdriCvYnh5wY4RLxCDl1Y1lk3oUkR8JqhQL69F7_FFxHDryO0tM16xqVu7u4odOkaLzq6YGZ4jp54PRd48dDP0fePH75dfu6uvn76cnlx1dmB8dr1kzYczOiYMcJ7wvQguZ3GUUojJe8HJ2U_GMHIpIVlg3Pcg-aUeEZb8_05en3au-bU_JeqllAszM08pK0oOg3jNEpKZUP7E2pzKiWDV2v7Qec7RYk6pq4O6j51dUxdkVZkaqpXDwc2s4D7p_kbcwPenQBob94GyKrYANGCCxlsVS6F_x74A-w6lo0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1847879119</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Different configuration of socket shield technique in peri-implant bone preservation: An experimental study in dog mandible</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Calvo-Guirado, José Luis ; Troiano, Miguel ; López-López, P.J. ; Ramírez-Fernandez, María Piedad ; de Val, José Eduardo Maté Sánchez ; Marin, Jose Manuel Granero ; Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre</creator><creatorcontrib>Calvo-Guirado, José Luis ; Troiano, Miguel ; López-López, P.J. ; Ramírez-Fernandez, María Piedad ; de Val, José Eduardo Maté Sánchez ; Marin, Jose Manuel Granero ; Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the residual root and peri implant bone dimensions on the clinical success of the socket shield technique.
Thirty-six dental implants were installed in 6 dogs. The clinical crowns of teeth P3, P4 and M1 were beheaded. Afterwards, the roots were worn down 2–3mm in apical direction until they were located at crestal level. Posterior implant beds were prepared in the center of the roots passing by 3mm apically forming 6 groups in accordance to the remaining root thickness. Radiography of the crestal bone level was performed on day 0 and after 12 weeks. Histomorphometric analyses of the specimens were carried out to measure the crestal bone level, the bone to implant contact and the buccal and lingual bone thickness at the implant shoulder portion. Correlations between groups were analyzed through nonparametric Friedman test, statistical significance was set as p<0.05. All 36 implants were osseointegrated, but 3 samples showed a clinical inflammatory reaction and some radicular fragments presented a small resorption process. On the buccal and lingual side, the radicular fragment was attached to the buccal bone plate by a physiologic periodontal ligament. In the areas where there was space between the implant and the fragment, newly formed bone was demonstrated directly on the implant surface. Within the limitations of an animal pilot study, root-T belt technique may be beneficial in preserving and protecting the bundle bone and preservation of soft tissues. If the thickness of the buccal bone is 3mm, and the thickness of the remaining root fragment is 2mm, the socket shield technique is more predictable and the bone contours can be maintained.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0940-9602</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1618-0402</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2016.06.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27565228</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Elsevier GmbH</publisher><subject>Alveolar bone preservation ; Animals ; Bone-Implant Interface - anatomy & histology ; Crestal bone behavior ; Dental Implants, Single-Tooth ; Dogs ; Immediate Dental Implant Loading - instrumentation ; Immediate Dental Implant Loading - methods ; Immediate implant ; Organs at Risk - anatomy & histology ; Post and Core Technique - instrumentation ; Radicular retention ; Socket shield ; Tooth Extraction - instrumentation ; Tooth Extraction - methods ; Tooth Root - cytology ; Tooth Root - surgery ; Tooth Socket - cytology ; Tooth Socket - surgery ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Annals of anatomy, 2016-11, Vol.208, p.109-115</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier GmbH</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-38ab5eb7d2bb6ff02a495c87799b99534d9934b6208a6c24dd5fea510f21a51f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-38ab5eb7d2bb6ff02a495c87799b99534d9934b6208a6c24dd5fea510f21a51f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5863-9101</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27565228$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Calvo-Guirado, José Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Troiano, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-López, P.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramírez-Fernandez, María Piedad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Val, José Eduardo Maté Sánchez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marin, Jose Manuel Granero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre</creatorcontrib><title>Different configuration of socket shield technique in peri-implant bone preservation: An experimental study in dog mandible</title><title>Annals of anatomy</title><addtitle>Ann Anat</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the residual root and peri implant bone dimensions on the clinical success of the socket shield technique.
Thirty-six dental implants were installed in 6 dogs. The clinical crowns of teeth P3, P4 and M1 were beheaded. Afterwards, the roots were worn down 2–3mm in apical direction until they were located at crestal level. Posterior implant beds were prepared in the center of the roots passing by 3mm apically forming 6 groups in accordance to the remaining root thickness. Radiography of the crestal bone level was performed on day 0 and after 12 weeks. Histomorphometric analyses of the specimens were carried out to measure the crestal bone level, the bone to implant contact and the buccal and lingual bone thickness at the implant shoulder portion. Correlations between groups were analyzed through nonparametric Friedman test, statistical significance was set as p<0.05. All 36 implants were osseointegrated, but 3 samples showed a clinical inflammatory reaction and some radicular fragments presented a small resorption process. On the buccal and lingual side, the radicular fragment was attached to the buccal bone plate by a physiologic periodontal ligament. In the areas where there was space between the implant and the fragment, newly formed bone was demonstrated directly on the implant surface. Within the limitations of an animal pilot study, root-T belt technique may be beneficial in preserving and protecting the bundle bone and preservation of soft tissues. If the thickness of the buccal bone is 3mm, and the thickness of the remaining root fragment is 2mm, the socket shield technique is more predictable and the bone contours can be maintained.</description><subject>Alveolar bone preservation</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bone-Implant Interface - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Crestal bone behavior</subject><subject>Dental Implants, Single-Tooth</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Immediate Dental Implant Loading - instrumentation</subject><subject>Immediate Dental Implant Loading - methods</subject><subject>Immediate implant</subject><subject>Organs at Risk - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Post and Core Technique - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radicular retention</subject><subject>Socket shield</subject><subject>Tooth Extraction - instrumentation</subject><subject>Tooth Extraction - methods</subject><subject>Tooth Root - cytology</subject><subject>Tooth Root - surgery</subject><subject>Tooth Socket - cytology</subject><subject>Tooth Socket - surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0940-9602</issn><issn>1618-0402</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEuLFTEQhYMoznX0FwiSpZu-JulOuiO4GMYnDLjRdcijMpNrd9Im6cHBP2_u3NGlUFAUfKfq1EHoJSV7Sqh4c9hrHXXdszbsSSsyPUI7KujUkYGwx2hH5EA6KQg7Q89KORDSCy6Gp-iMjVxwxqYd-v0-eA8ZYsU2RR-ut6xrSBEnj0uyP6DichNgdriCvYnh5wY4RLxCDl1Y1lk3oUkR8JqhQL69F7_FFxHDryO0tM16xqVu7u4odOkaLzq6YGZ4jp54PRd48dDP0fePH75dfu6uvn76cnlx1dmB8dr1kzYczOiYMcJ7wvQguZ3GUUojJe8HJ2U_GMHIpIVlg3Pcg-aUeEZb8_05en3au-bU_JeqllAszM08pK0oOg3jNEpKZUP7E2pzKiWDV2v7Qec7RYk6pq4O6j51dUxdkVZkaqpXDwc2s4D7p_kbcwPenQBob94GyKrYANGCCxlsVS6F_x74A-w6lo0</recordid><startdate>20161101</startdate><enddate>20161101</enddate><creator>Calvo-Guirado, José Luis</creator><creator>Troiano, Miguel</creator><creator>López-López, P.J.</creator><creator>Ramírez-Fernandez, María Piedad</creator><creator>de Val, José Eduardo Maté Sánchez</creator><creator>Marin, Jose Manuel Granero</creator><creator>Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre</creator><general>Elsevier GmbH</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5863-9101</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20161101</creationdate><title>Different configuration of socket shield technique in peri-implant bone preservation: An experimental study in dog mandible</title><author>Calvo-Guirado, José Luis ; Troiano, Miguel ; López-López, P.J. ; Ramírez-Fernandez, María Piedad ; de Val, José Eduardo Maté Sánchez ; Marin, Jose Manuel Granero ; Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-38ab5eb7d2bb6ff02a495c87799b99534d9934b6208a6c24dd5fea510f21a51f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Alveolar bone preservation</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bone-Implant Interface - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Crestal bone behavior</topic><topic>Dental Implants, Single-Tooth</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Immediate Dental Implant Loading - instrumentation</topic><topic>Immediate Dental Implant Loading - methods</topic><topic>Immediate implant</topic><topic>Organs at Risk - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Post and Core Technique - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radicular retention</topic><topic>Socket shield</topic><topic>Tooth Extraction - instrumentation</topic><topic>Tooth Extraction - methods</topic><topic>Tooth Root - cytology</topic><topic>Tooth Root - surgery</topic><topic>Tooth Socket - cytology</topic><topic>Tooth Socket - surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Calvo-Guirado, José Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Troiano, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-López, P.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramírez-Fernandez, María Piedad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Val, José Eduardo Maté Sánchez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marin, Jose Manuel Granero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of anatomy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Calvo-Guirado, José Luis</au><au>Troiano, Miguel</au><au>López-López, P.J.</au><au>Ramírez-Fernandez, María Piedad</au><au>de Val, José Eduardo Maté Sánchez</au><au>Marin, Jose Manuel Granero</au><au>Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Different configuration of socket shield technique in peri-implant bone preservation: An experimental study in dog mandible</atitle><jtitle>Annals of anatomy</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Anat</addtitle><date>2016-11-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>208</volume><spage>109</spage><epage>115</epage><pages>109-115</pages><issn>0940-9602</issn><eissn>1618-0402</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the residual root and peri implant bone dimensions on the clinical success of the socket shield technique.
Thirty-six dental implants were installed in 6 dogs. The clinical crowns of teeth P3, P4 and M1 were beheaded. Afterwards, the roots were worn down 2–3mm in apical direction until they were located at crestal level. Posterior implant beds were prepared in the center of the roots passing by 3mm apically forming 6 groups in accordance to the remaining root thickness. Radiography of the crestal bone level was performed on day 0 and after 12 weeks. Histomorphometric analyses of the specimens were carried out to measure the crestal bone level, the bone to implant contact and the buccal and lingual bone thickness at the implant shoulder portion. Correlations between groups were analyzed through nonparametric Friedman test, statistical significance was set as p<0.05. All 36 implants were osseointegrated, but 3 samples showed a clinical inflammatory reaction and some radicular fragments presented a small resorption process. On the buccal and lingual side, the radicular fragment was attached to the buccal bone plate by a physiologic periodontal ligament. In the areas where there was space between the implant and the fragment, newly formed bone was demonstrated directly on the implant surface. Within the limitations of an animal pilot study, root-T belt technique may be beneficial in preserving and protecting the bundle bone and preservation of soft tissues. If the thickness of the buccal bone is 3mm, and the thickness of the remaining root fragment is 2mm, the socket shield technique is more predictable and the bone contours can be maintained.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Elsevier GmbH</pub><pmid>27565228</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.aanat.2016.06.008</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5863-9101</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0940-9602 |
ispartof | Annals of anatomy, 2016-11, Vol.208, p.109-115 |
issn | 0940-9602 1618-0402 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1847879119 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Alveolar bone preservation Animals Bone-Implant Interface - anatomy & histology Crestal bone behavior Dental Implants, Single-Tooth Dogs Immediate Dental Implant Loading - instrumentation Immediate Dental Implant Loading - methods Immediate implant Organs at Risk - anatomy & histology Post and Core Technique - instrumentation Radicular retention Socket shield Tooth Extraction - instrumentation Tooth Extraction - methods Tooth Root - cytology Tooth Root - surgery Tooth Socket - cytology Tooth Socket - surgery Treatment Outcome |
title | Different configuration of socket shield technique in peri-implant bone preservation: An experimental study in dog mandible |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T07%3A02%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Different%20configuration%20of%20socket%20shield%20technique%20in%20peri-implant%20bone%20preservation:%20An%20experimental%20study%20in%20dog%20mandible&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20anatomy&rft.au=Calvo-Guirado,%20Jos%C3%A9%20Luis&rft.date=2016-11-01&rft.volume=208&rft.spage=109&rft.epage=115&rft.pages=109-115&rft.issn=0940-9602&rft.eissn=1618-0402&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.aanat.2016.06.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1847879119%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-38ab5eb7d2bb6ff02a495c87799b99534d9934b6208a6c24dd5fea510f21a51f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1847879119&rft_id=info:pmid/27565228&rfr_iscdi=true |