Loading…

Different configuration of socket shield technique in peri-implant bone preservation: An experimental study in dog mandible

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the residual root and peri implant bone dimensions on the clinical success of the socket shield technique. Thirty-six dental implants were installed in 6 dogs. The clinical crowns of teeth P3, P4 and M1 were beheaded. Afterwards, the roots were...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of anatomy 2016-11, Vol.208, p.109-115
Main Authors: Calvo-Guirado, José Luis, Troiano, Miguel, López-López, P.J., Ramírez-Fernandez, María Piedad, de Val, José Eduardo Maté Sánchez, Marin, Jose Manuel Granero, Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-38ab5eb7d2bb6ff02a495c87799b99534d9934b6208a6c24dd5fea510f21a51f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-38ab5eb7d2bb6ff02a495c87799b99534d9934b6208a6c24dd5fea510f21a51f3
container_end_page 115
container_issue
container_start_page 109
container_title Annals of anatomy
container_volume 208
creator Calvo-Guirado, José Luis
Troiano, Miguel
López-López, P.J.
Ramírez-Fernandez, María Piedad
de Val, José Eduardo Maté Sánchez
Marin, Jose Manuel Granero
Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the residual root and peri implant bone dimensions on the clinical success of the socket shield technique. Thirty-six dental implants were installed in 6 dogs. The clinical crowns of teeth P3, P4 and M1 were beheaded. Afterwards, the roots were worn down 2–3mm in apical direction until they were located at crestal level. Posterior implant beds were prepared in the center of the roots passing by 3mm apically forming 6 groups in accordance to the remaining root thickness. Radiography of the crestal bone level was performed on day 0 and after 12 weeks. Histomorphometric analyses of the specimens were carried out to measure the crestal bone level, the bone to implant contact and the buccal and lingual bone thickness at the implant shoulder portion. Correlations between groups were analyzed through nonparametric Friedman test, statistical significance was set as p
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.aanat.2016.06.008
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1847879119</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0940960216301248</els_id><sourcerecordid>1847879119</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-38ab5eb7d2bb6ff02a495c87799b99534d9934b6208a6c24dd5fea510f21a51f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEuLFTEQhYMoznX0FwiSpZu-JulOuiO4GMYnDLjRdcijMpNrd9Im6cHBP2_u3NGlUFAUfKfq1EHoJSV7Sqh4c9hrHXXdszbsSSsyPUI7KujUkYGwx2hH5EA6KQg7Q89KORDSCy6Gp-iMjVxwxqYd-v0-eA8ZYsU2RR-ut6xrSBEnj0uyP6DichNgdriCvYnh5wY4RLxCDl1Y1lk3oUkR8JqhQL69F7_FFxHDryO0tM16xqVu7u4odOkaLzq6YGZ4jp54PRd48dDP0fePH75dfu6uvn76cnlx1dmB8dr1kzYczOiYMcJ7wvQguZ3GUUojJe8HJ2U_GMHIpIVlg3Pcg-aUeEZb8_05en3au-bU_JeqllAszM08pK0oOg3jNEpKZUP7E2pzKiWDV2v7Qec7RYk6pq4O6j51dUxdkVZkaqpXDwc2s4D7p_kbcwPenQBob94GyKrYANGCCxlsVS6F_x74A-w6lo0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1847879119</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Different configuration of socket shield technique in peri-implant bone preservation: An experimental study in dog mandible</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Calvo-Guirado, José Luis ; Troiano, Miguel ; López-López, P.J. ; Ramírez-Fernandez, María Piedad ; de Val, José Eduardo Maté Sánchez ; Marin, Jose Manuel Granero ; Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre</creator><creatorcontrib>Calvo-Guirado, José Luis ; Troiano, Miguel ; López-López, P.J. ; Ramírez-Fernandez, María Piedad ; de Val, José Eduardo Maté Sánchez ; Marin, Jose Manuel Granero ; Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the residual root and peri implant bone dimensions on the clinical success of the socket shield technique. Thirty-six dental implants were installed in 6 dogs. The clinical crowns of teeth P3, P4 and M1 were beheaded. Afterwards, the roots were worn down 2–3mm in apical direction until they were located at crestal level. Posterior implant beds were prepared in the center of the roots passing by 3mm apically forming 6 groups in accordance to the remaining root thickness. Radiography of the crestal bone level was performed on day 0 and after 12 weeks. Histomorphometric analyses of the specimens were carried out to measure the crestal bone level, the bone to implant contact and the buccal and lingual bone thickness at the implant shoulder portion. Correlations between groups were analyzed through nonparametric Friedman test, statistical significance was set as p&lt;0.05. All 36 implants were osseointegrated, but 3 samples showed a clinical inflammatory reaction and some radicular fragments presented a small resorption process. On the buccal and lingual side, the radicular fragment was attached to the buccal bone plate by a physiologic periodontal ligament. In the areas where there was space between the implant and the fragment, newly formed bone was demonstrated directly on the implant surface. Within the limitations of an animal pilot study, root-T belt technique may be beneficial in preserving and protecting the bundle bone and preservation of soft tissues. If the thickness of the buccal bone is 3mm, and the thickness of the remaining root fragment is 2mm, the socket shield technique is more predictable and the bone contours can be maintained.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0940-9602</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1618-0402</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2016.06.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27565228</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Elsevier GmbH</publisher><subject>Alveolar bone preservation ; Animals ; Bone-Implant Interface - anatomy &amp; histology ; Crestal bone behavior ; Dental Implants, Single-Tooth ; Dogs ; Immediate Dental Implant Loading - instrumentation ; Immediate Dental Implant Loading - methods ; Immediate implant ; Organs at Risk - anatomy &amp; histology ; Post and Core Technique - instrumentation ; Radicular retention ; Socket shield ; Tooth Extraction - instrumentation ; Tooth Extraction - methods ; Tooth Root - cytology ; Tooth Root - surgery ; Tooth Socket - cytology ; Tooth Socket - surgery ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Annals of anatomy, 2016-11, Vol.208, p.109-115</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier GmbH</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-38ab5eb7d2bb6ff02a495c87799b99534d9934b6208a6c24dd5fea510f21a51f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-38ab5eb7d2bb6ff02a495c87799b99534d9934b6208a6c24dd5fea510f21a51f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5863-9101</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27565228$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Calvo-Guirado, José Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Troiano, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-López, P.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramírez-Fernandez, María Piedad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Val, José Eduardo Maté Sánchez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marin, Jose Manuel Granero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre</creatorcontrib><title>Different configuration of socket shield technique in peri-implant bone preservation: An experimental study in dog mandible</title><title>Annals of anatomy</title><addtitle>Ann Anat</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the residual root and peri implant bone dimensions on the clinical success of the socket shield technique. Thirty-six dental implants were installed in 6 dogs. The clinical crowns of teeth P3, P4 and M1 were beheaded. Afterwards, the roots were worn down 2–3mm in apical direction until they were located at crestal level. Posterior implant beds were prepared in the center of the roots passing by 3mm apically forming 6 groups in accordance to the remaining root thickness. Radiography of the crestal bone level was performed on day 0 and after 12 weeks. Histomorphometric analyses of the specimens were carried out to measure the crestal bone level, the bone to implant contact and the buccal and lingual bone thickness at the implant shoulder portion. Correlations between groups were analyzed through nonparametric Friedman test, statistical significance was set as p&lt;0.05. All 36 implants were osseointegrated, but 3 samples showed a clinical inflammatory reaction and some radicular fragments presented a small resorption process. On the buccal and lingual side, the radicular fragment was attached to the buccal bone plate by a physiologic periodontal ligament. In the areas where there was space between the implant and the fragment, newly formed bone was demonstrated directly on the implant surface. Within the limitations of an animal pilot study, root-T belt technique may be beneficial in preserving and protecting the bundle bone and preservation of soft tissues. If the thickness of the buccal bone is 3mm, and the thickness of the remaining root fragment is 2mm, the socket shield technique is more predictable and the bone contours can be maintained.</description><subject>Alveolar bone preservation</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bone-Implant Interface - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Crestal bone behavior</subject><subject>Dental Implants, Single-Tooth</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Immediate Dental Implant Loading - instrumentation</subject><subject>Immediate Dental Implant Loading - methods</subject><subject>Immediate implant</subject><subject>Organs at Risk - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Post and Core Technique - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radicular retention</subject><subject>Socket shield</subject><subject>Tooth Extraction - instrumentation</subject><subject>Tooth Extraction - methods</subject><subject>Tooth Root - cytology</subject><subject>Tooth Root - surgery</subject><subject>Tooth Socket - cytology</subject><subject>Tooth Socket - surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0940-9602</issn><issn>1618-0402</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEuLFTEQhYMoznX0FwiSpZu-JulOuiO4GMYnDLjRdcijMpNrd9Im6cHBP2_u3NGlUFAUfKfq1EHoJSV7Sqh4c9hrHXXdszbsSSsyPUI7KujUkYGwx2hH5EA6KQg7Q89KORDSCy6Gp-iMjVxwxqYd-v0-eA8ZYsU2RR-ut6xrSBEnj0uyP6DichNgdriCvYnh5wY4RLxCDl1Y1lk3oUkR8JqhQL69F7_FFxHDryO0tM16xqVu7u4odOkaLzq6YGZ4jp54PRd48dDP0fePH75dfu6uvn76cnlx1dmB8dr1kzYczOiYMcJ7wvQguZ3GUUojJe8HJ2U_GMHIpIVlg3Pcg-aUeEZb8_05en3au-bU_JeqllAszM08pK0oOg3jNEpKZUP7E2pzKiWDV2v7Qec7RYk6pq4O6j51dUxdkVZkaqpXDwc2s4D7p_kbcwPenQBob94GyKrYANGCCxlsVS6F_x74A-w6lo0</recordid><startdate>20161101</startdate><enddate>20161101</enddate><creator>Calvo-Guirado, José Luis</creator><creator>Troiano, Miguel</creator><creator>López-López, P.J.</creator><creator>Ramírez-Fernandez, María Piedad</creator><creator>de Val, José Eduardo Maté Sánchez</creator><creator>Marin, Jose Manuel Granero</creator><creator>Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre</creator><general>Elsevier GmbH</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5863-9101</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20161101</creationdate><title>Different configuration of socket shield technique in peri-implant bone preservation: An experimental study in dog mandible</title><author>Calvo-Guirado, José Luis ; Troiano, Miguel ; López-López, P.J. ; Ramírez-Fernandez, María Piedad ; de Val, José Eduardo Maté Sánchez ; Marin, Jose Manuel Granero ; Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-38ab5eb7d2bb6ff02a495c87799b99534d9934b6208a6c24dd5fea510f21a51f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Alveolar bone preservation</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bone-Implant Interface - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Crestal bone behavior</topic><topic>Dental Implants, Single-Tooth</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Immediate Dental Implant Loading - instrumentation</topic><topic>Immediate Dental Implant Loading - methods</topic><topic>Immediate implant</topic><topic>Organs at Risk - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Post and Core Technique - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radicular retention</topic><topic>Socket shield</topic><topic>Tooth Extraction - instrumentation</topic><topic>Tooth Extraction - methods</topic><topic>Tooth Root - cytology</topic><topic>Tooth Root - surgery</topic><topic>Tooth Socket - cytology</topic><topic>Tooth Socket - surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Calvo-Guirado, José Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Troiano, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-López, P.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramírez-Fernandez, María Piedad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Val, José Eduardo Maté Sánchez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marin, Jose Manuel Granero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of anatomy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Calvo-Guirado, José Luis</au><au>Troiano, Miguel</au><au>López-López, P.J.</au><au>Ramírez-Fernandez, María Piedad</au><au>de Val, José Eduardo Maté Sánchez</au><au>Marin, Jose Manuel Granero</au><au>Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Different configuration of socket shield technique in peri-implant bone preservation: An experimental study in dog mandible</atitle><jtitle>Annals of anatomy</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Anat</addtitle><date>2016-11-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>208</volume><spage>109</spage><epage>115</epage><pages>109-115</pages><issn>0940-9602</issn><eissn>1618-0402</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the residual root and peri implant bone dimensions on the clinical success of the socket shield technique. Thirty-six dental implants were installed in 6 dogs. The clinical crowns of teeth P3, P4 and M1 were beheaded. Afterwards, the roots were worn down 2–3mm in apical direction until they were located at crestal level. Posterior implant beds were prepared in the center of the roots passing by 3mm apically forming 6 groups in accordance to the remaining root thickness. Radiography of the crestal bone level was performed on day 0 and after 12 weeks. Histomorphometric analyses of the specimens were carried out to measure the crestal bone level, the bone to implant contact and the buccal and lingual bone thickness at the implant shoulder portion. Correlations between groups were analyzed through nonparametric Friedman test, statistical significance was set as p&lt;0.05. All 36 implants were osseointegrated, but 3 samples showed a clinical inflammatory reaction and some radicular fragments presented a small resorption process. On the buccal and lingual side, the radicular fragment was attached to the buccal bone plate by a physiologic periodontal ligament. In the areas where there was space between the implant and the fragment, newly formed bone was demonstrated directly on the implant surface. Within the limitations of an animal pilot study, root-T belt technique may be beneficial in preserving and protecting the bundle bone and preservation of soft tissues. If the thickness of the buccal bone is 3mm, and the thickness of the remaining root fragment is 2mm, the socket shield technique is more predictable and the bone contours can be maintained.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Elsevier GmbH</pub><pmid>27565228</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.aanat.2016.06.008</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5863-9101</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0940-9602
ispartof Annals of anatomy, 2016-11, Vol.208, p.109-115
issn 0940-9602
1618-0402
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1847879119
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Alveolar bone preservation
Animals
Bone-Implant Interface - anatomy & histology
Crestal bone behavior
Dental Implants, Single-Tooth
Dogs
Immediate Dental Implant Loading - instrumentation
Immediate Dental Implant Loading - methods
Immediate implant
Organs at Risk - anatomy & histology
Post and Core Technique - instrumentation
Radicular retention
Socket shield
Tooth Extraction - instrumentation
Tooth Extraction - methods
Tooth Root - cytology
Tooth Root - surgery
Tooth Socket - cytology
Tooth Socket - surgery
Treatment Outcome
title Different configuration of socket shield technique in peri-implant bone preservation: An experimental study in dog mandible
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T07%3A02%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Different%20configuration%20of%20socket%20shield%20technique%20in%20peri-implant%20bone%20preservation:%20An%20experimental%20study%20in%20dog%20mandible&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20anatomy&rft.au=Calvo-Guirado,%20Jos%C3%A9%20Luis&rft.date=2016-11-01&rft.volume=208&rft.spage=109&rft.epage=115&rft.pages=109-115&rft.issn=0940-9602&rft.eissn=1618-0402&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.aanat.2016.06.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1847879119%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-38ab5eb7d2bb6ff02a495c87799b99534d9934b6208a6c24dd5fea510f21a51f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1847879119&rft_id=info:pmid/27565228&rfr_iscdi=true