Loading…

The Use of Intraoperative Traction in Pediatric Scoliosis Surgery: A Systematic Review

Abstract Study Design Systematic review. Objective To study the morbidity and the potential benefits of using intraoperative skeletal traction as an adjunct method for correcting scoliosis. Summary of Background Data Cotrel et al., used intraoperative skeletal traction in all patients in their origi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Spine deformity 2015, Vol.3 (1), p.45-51
Main Authors: LaMothe, J.M., MD, PhD, FRCSC, Al Sayegh, S., MD, Parsons, D.L., MD, FRCSC, Ferri-de-Barros, F., MD, MSc, FSBOT
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3707-e26a060b266b5b207d06716297c2cbb4435582cc820a48ca32fe116ac15304e13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3707-e26a060b266b5b207d06716297c2cbb4435582cc820a48ca32fe116ac15304e13
container_end_page 51
container_issue 1
container_start_page 45
container_title Spine deformity
container_volume 3
creator LaMothe, J.M., MD, PhD, FRCSC
Al Sayegh, S., MD
Parsons, D.L., MD, FRCSC
Ferri-de-Barros, F., MD, MSc, FSBOT
description Abstract Study Design Systematic review. Objective To study the morbidity and the potential benefits of using intraoperative skeletal traction as an adjunct method for correcting scoliosis. Summary of Background Data Cotrel et al., used intraoperative skeletal traction in all patients in their original series of segmental spinal instrumentation for scoliosis correction (Cotrel et al., Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988;227:10–23). However, the use of intraoperative traction may introduce other forms of surgical morbidity, which has not been systematically studied. Methods Two independent reviewers searched MEDLINE (1948–current) and EMBASE (1980–current) using the keywords scoliosis , intraoperative , and traction in all fields, combined with AND . Studies were subject to full-text assessment against specific inclusion and exclusion criteria; discrepancies between the reviewers were resolved by a third independent reviewer. Data were extracted into standardized extraction tables and papers were critically appraised papers with regards to their relative strengths and weaknesses, with particular attention to the study objective. Results Nine papers were included: case report (n = 1), retrospective case series (n = 2), retrospective case–control (n = 6), and studies included both adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and neuromuscular scoliosis. Seven studies reported positive effects of intraoperative skeletal traction on diverse outcome measures, such as correction of pelvic obliquity, Cobb angle, and axial plane deformity, as well as precluding the need for an anterior release preceding posterior instrumentation for large curves. Overall, there was only one reported postoperative traction-related complication (anterosuperior iliac spine pressure sore). One paper reported that intraoperative traction may evoke neuromonitoring signal changes in a large proportion of patients undergoing AIS surgery. These changes were responded to intraoperatively by decreasing or removing weight and none of the patients had postoperative neurologic deficits. Conclusion Isolated intraoperative skeletal traction may be a low-morbidity adjunct to facilitate scoliosis surgery. Further studies are needed to compare outcomes of scoliosis surgery with or without intraoperative skeletal traction.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jspd.2014.06.007
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1847879783</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S2212134X14001130</els_id><sourcerecordid>1847879783</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3707-e26a060b266b5b207d06716297c2cbb4435582cc820a48ca32fe116ac15304e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kt1qFDEYhoMottTegAeSQ092-uVnkqyIUIrWQkFxt-hZyGS-1YyzkzWZqezdeC1emRm2VvCgOUkg7_OSPHyEPGdQMWDqrKu6vGsrDkxWoCoA_Ygcc874gonaPL4_yy9H5DTnDsoyRjJTPyVHXC-5ljU7Jp_X35DeZKRxQ6-GMbm4w-TGcIt0nZwfQxxoGOhHbIMbU_B05WMfYg6Zrqb0FdP-FT3__Wu1zyNuC-fpJ7wN-PMZebJxfcbTu_2E3Lx7u754v7j-cHl1cX698EKDXiBXDhQ0XKmmbjjoFpRmii-1575ppBR1bbj3hoOTxjvBN8iYcp7VAiQycUJeHnp3Kf6YMI92G7LHvncDxilbZqQ2eqmNKFF-iPoUc064sbsUti7tLQM7O7WdnZ3a2akFZYvTAr2465-aLbb3yF-DJSAOgVyuhiLEdnFKQ_nzw7WvDxQWN8VXstkHHHzRnNCPto3hYfzNf7jvwxC867_jHvO_F9jMLdjVPAvzKDAJwJgA8QddQa0H</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1847879783</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Use of Intraoperative Traction in Pediatric Scoliosis Surgery: A Systematic Review</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>LaMothe, J.M., MD, PhD, FRCSC ; Al Sayegh, S., MD ; Parsons, D.L., MD, FRCSC ; Ferri-de-Barros, F., MD, MSc, FSBOT</creator><creatorcontrib>LaMothe, J.M., MD, PhD, FRCSC ; Al Sayegh, S., MD ; Parsons, D.L., MD, FRCSC ; Ferri-de-Barros, F., MD, MSc, FSBOT</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Study Design Systematic review. Objective To study the morbidity and the potential benefits of using intraoperative skeletal traction as an adjunct method for correcting scoliosis. Summary of Background Data Cotrel et al., used intraoperative skeletal traction in all patients in their original series of segmental spinal instrumentation for scoliosis correction (Cotrel et al., Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988;227:10–23). However, the use of intraoperative traction may introduce other forms of surgical morbidity, which has not been systematically studied. Methods Two independent reviewers searched MEDLINE (1948–current) and EMBASE (1980–current) using the keywords scoliosis , intraoperative , and traction in all fields, combined with AND . Studies were subject to full-text assessment against specific inclusion and exclusion criteria; discrepancies between the reviewers were resolved by a third independent reviewer. Data were extracted into standardized extraction tables and papers were critically appraised papers with regards to their relative strengths and weaknesses, with particular attention to the study objective. Results Nine papers were included: case report (n = 1), retrospective case series (n = 2), retrospective case–control (n = 6), and studies included both adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and neuromuscular scoliosis. Seven studies reported positive effects of intraoperative skeletal traction on diverse outcome measures, such as correction of pelvic obliquity, Cobb angle, and axial plane deformity, as well as precluding the need for an anterior release preceding posterior instrumentation for large curves. Overall, there was only one reported postoperative traction-related complication (anterosuperior iliac spine pressure sore). One paper reported that intraoperative traction may evoke neuromonitoring signal changes in a large proportion of patients undergoing AIS surgery. These changes were responded to intraoperatively by decreasing or removing weight and none of the patients had postoperative neurologic deficits. Conclusion Isolated intraoperative skeletal traction may be a low-morbidity adjunct to facilitate scoliosis surgery. Further studies are needed to compare outcomes of scoliosis surgery with or without intraoperative skeletal traction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2212-134X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2212-1358</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jspd.2014.06.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27927451</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis ; Intraoperative ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Neuromuscular scoliosis ; Orthopedics ; Scoliosis ; Systematic Reviews ; Traction</subject><ispartof>Spine deformity, 2015, Vol.3 (1), p.45-51</ispartof><rights>Scoliosis Research Society</rights><rights>2015 Scoliosis Research Society</rights><rights>Scoliosis Research Society 2015</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Scoliosis Research Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3707-e26a060b266b5b207d06716297c2cbb4435582cc820a48ca32fe116ac15304e13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3707-e26a060b266b5b207d06716297c2cbb4435582cc820a48ca32fe116ac15304e13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27927451$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>LaMothe, J.M., MD, PhD, FRCSC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al Sayegh, S., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parsons, D.L., MD, FRCSC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferri-de-Barros, F., MD, MSc, FSBOT</creatorcontrib><title>The Use of Intraoperative Traction in Pediatric Scoliosis Surgery: A Systematic Review</title><title>Spine deformity</title><addtitle>Spine Deform</addtitle><addtitle>Spine Deform</addtitle><description>Abstract Study Design Systematic review. Objective To study the morbidity and the potential benefits of using intraoperative skeletal traction as an adjunct method for correcting scoliosis. Summary of Background Data Cotrel et al., used intraoperative skeletal traction in all patients in their original series of segmental spinal instrumentation for scoliosis correction (Cotrel et al., Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988;227:10–23). However, the use of intraoperative traction may introduce other forms of surgical morbidity, which has not been systematically studied. Methods Two independent reviewers searched MEDLINE (1948–current) and EMBASE (1980–current) using the keywords scoliosis , intraoperative , and traction in all fields, combined with AND . Studies were subject to full-text assessment against specific inclusion and exclusion criteria; discrepancies between the reviewers were resolved by a third independent reviewer. Data were extracted into standardized extraction tables and papers were critically appraised papers with regards to their relative strengths and weaknesses, with particular attention to the study objective. Results Nine papers were included: case report (n = 1), retrospective case series (n = 2), retrospective case–control (n = 6), and studies included both adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and neuromuscular scoliosis. Seven studies reported positive effects of intraoperative skeletal traction on diverse outcome measures, such as correction of pelvic obliquity, Cobb angle, and axial plane deformity, as well as precluding the need for an anterior release preceding posterior instrumentation for large curves. Overall, there was only one reported postoperative traction-related complication (anterosuperior iliac spine pressure sore). One paper reported that intraoperative traction may evoke neuromonitoring signal changes in a large proportion of patients undergoing AIS surgery. These changes were responded to intraoperatively by decreasing or removing weight and none of the patients had postoperative neurologic deficits. Conclusion Isolated intraoperative skeletal traction may be a low-morbidity adjunct to facilitate scoliosis surgery. Further studies are needed to compare outcomes of scoliosis surgery with or without intraoperative skeletal traction.</description><subject>Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis</subject><subject>Intraoperative</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Neuromuscular scoliosis</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Scoliosis</subject><subject>Systematic Reviews</subject><subject>Traction</subject><issn>2212-134X</issn><issn>2212-1358</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kt1qFDEYhoMottTegAeSQ092-uVnkqyIUIrWQkFxt-hZyGS-1YyzkzWZqezdeC1emRm2VvCgOUkg7_OSPHyEPGdQMWDqrKu6vGsrDkxWoCoA_Ygcc874gonaPL4_yy9H5DTnDsoyRjJTPyVHXC-5ljU7Jp_X35DeZKRxQ6-GMbm4w-TGcIt0nZwfQxxoGOhHbIMbU_B05WMfYg6Zrqb0FdP-FT3__Wu1zyNuC-fpJ7wN-PMZebJxfcbTu_2E3Lx7u754v7j-cHl1cX698EKDXiBXDhQ0XKmmbjjoFpRmii-1575ppBR1bbj3hoOTxjvBN8iYcp7VAiQycUJeHnp3Kf6YMI92G7LHvncDxilbZqQ2eqmNKFF-iPoUc064sbsUti7tLQM7O7WdnZ3a2akFZYvTAr2465-aLbb3yF-DJSAOgVyuhiLEdnFKQ_nzw7WvDxQWN8VXstkHHHzRnNCPto3hYfzNf7jvwxC867_jHvO_F9jMLdjVPAvzKDAJwJgA8QddQa0H</recordid><startdate>2015</startdate><enddate>2015</enddate><creator>LaMothe, J.M., MD, PhD, FRCSC</creator><creator>Al Sayegh, S., MD</creator><creator>Parsons, D.L., MD, FRCSC</creator><creator>Ferri-de-Barros, F., MD, MSc, FSBOT</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Springer International Publishing</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2015</creationdate><title>The Use of Intraoperative Traction in Pediatric Scoliosis Surgery: A Systematic Review</title><author>LaMothe, J.M., MD, PhD, FRCSC ; Al Sayegh, S., MD ; Parsons, D.L., MD, FRCSC ; Ferri-de-Barros, F., MD, MSc, FSBOT</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3707-e26a060b266b5b207d06716297c2cbb4435582cc820a48ca32fe116ac15304e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis</topic><topic>Intraoperative</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Neuromuscular scoliosis</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Scoliosis</topic><topic>Systematic Reviews</topic><topic>Traction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LaMothe, J.M., MD, PhD, FRCSC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al Sayegh, S., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parsons, D.L., MD, FRCSC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferri-de-Barros, F., MD, MSc, FSBOT</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Spine deformity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LaMothe, J.M., MD, PhD, FRCSC</au><au>Al Sayegh, S., MD</au><au>Parsons, D.L., MD, FRCSC</au><au>Ferri-de-Barros, F., MD, MSc, FSBOT</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Use of Intraoperative Traction in Pediatric Scoliosis Surgery: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Spine deformity</jtitle><stitle>Spine Deform</stitle><addtitle>Spine Deform</addtitle><date>2015</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>45</spage><epage>51</epage><pages>45-51</pages><issn>2212-134X</issn><eissn>2212-1358</eissn><abstract>Abstract Study Design Systematic review. Objective To study the morbidity and the potential benefits of using intraoperative skeletal traction as an adjunct method for correcting scoliosis. Summary of Background Data Cotrel et al., used intraoperative skeletal traction in all patients in their original series of segmental spinal instrumentation for scoliosis correction (Cotrel et al., Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988;227:10–23). However, the use of intraoperative traction may introduce other forms of surgical morbidity, which has not been systematically studied. Methods Two independent reviewers searched MEDLINE (1948–current) and EMBASE (1980–current) using the keywords scoliosis , intraoperative , and traction in all fields, combined with AND . Studies were subject to full-text assessment against specific inclusion and exclusion criteria; discrepancies between the reviewers were resolved by a third independent reviewer. Data were extracted into standardized extraction tables and papers were critically appraised papers with regards to their relative strengths and weaknesses, with particular attention to the study objective. Results Nine papers were included: case report (n = 1), retrospective case series (n = 2), retrospective case–control (n = 6), and studies included both adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and neuromuscular scoliosis. Seven studies reported positive effects of intraoperative skeletal traction on diverse outcome measures, such as correction of pelvic obliquity, Cobb angle, and axial plane deformity, as well as precluding the need for an anterior release preceding posterior instrumentation for large curves. Overall, there was only one reported postoperative traction-related complication (anterosuperior iliac spine pressure sore). One paper reported that intraoperative traction may evoke neuromonitoring signal changes in a large proportion of patients undergoing AIS surgery. These changes were responded to intraoperatively by decreasing or removing weight and none of the patients had postoperative neurologic deficits. Conclusion Isolated intraoperative skeletal traction may be a low-morbidity adjunct to facilitate scoliosis surgery. Further studies are needed to compare outcomes of scoliosis surgery with or without intraoperative skeletal traction.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27927451</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jspd.2014.06.007</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2212-134X
ispartof Spine deformity, 2015, Vol.3 (1), p.45-51
issn 2212-134X
2212-1358
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1847879783
source Springer Link
subjects Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Intraoperative
Medicine & Public Health
Neuromuscular scoliosis
Orthopedics
Scoliosis
Systematic Reviews
Traction
title The Use of Intraoperative Traction in Pediatric Scoliosis Surgery: A Systematic Review
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T05%3A14%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Use%20of%20Intraoperative%20Traction%20in%20Pediatric%20Scoliosis%20Surgery:%20A%C2%A0Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Spine%20deformity&rft.au=LaMothe,%20J.M.,%20MD,%20PhD,%20FRCSC&rft.date=2015&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=51&rft.pages=45-51&rft.issn=2212-134X&rft.eissn=2212-1358&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jspd.2014.06.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1847879783%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3707-e26a060b266b5b207d06716297c2cbb4435582cc820a48ca32fe116ac15304e13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1847879783&rft_id=info:pmid/27927451&rfr_iscdi=true