Loading…
Bacterial diversity analysis of pork longissimus lumborum following long term ohmic cooking and water bath cooking by amplicon sequencing of 16S rRNA gene
The bacterial ecology of long term ohmic- (LTOH) and water bath- (WB) cooked pork longissimus lumborum during refrigerated storage was investigated by culture-dependent and amplicon sequencing of 16S rRNA gene. High bacterial diversity was observed in both LTOH- and WB-cooked meat, and the diversity...
Saved in:
Published in: | Meat science 2017-01, Vol.123, p.97-104 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-181fa73038986a707f47fa45c99153492562117e0bf31e577d40dc87816f803e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-181fa73038986a707f47fa45c99153492562117e0bf31e577d40dc87816f803e3 |
container_end_page | 104 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 97 |
container_title | Meat science |
container_volume | 123 |
creator | Tian, Xiaojing Wu, Wei Yu, Qianqian Hou, Man Gao, Fang Li, Xingmin Dai, Ruitong |
description | The bacterial ecology of long term ohmic- (LTOH) and water bath- (WB) cooked pork longissimus lumborum during refrigerated storage was investigated by culture-dependent and amplicon sequencing of 16S rRNA gene. High bacterial diversity was observed in both LTOH- and WB-cooked meat, and the diversity decreased with prolonged storage, however, it was more complex in LTOH-cooked meat compared with WB treated ones. Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Enterococcus and Lactococcus were the most prevalent genera in the first two weeks and were replaced by Carnobacterium by the end of storage. Brevundimonas, Bacteroidaceae, Lactobacillaceae, uncultured Clostridiales Family_XIII, Alcaligenaceae and Micrococcales were more abundant in LTOH-cooked meat, while only Moraxellaceae were more abundant in WB-cooked samples. The different abundances may have resulted from the reaction of bacteria to different heating mechanisms. Overall, LTOH-cooked meat has a similar shelf-life with shorter processing time compared to WB treated ones.
•The bacterial diversity was more complex in LTOH-cooked meat.•Bacillus, etc. were the dominant genera in the first two weeks for both treatments.•Carnobacterium was the main genus by the end of storage for both cooking methods.•Electric current of LTOH cooking may exert some effect on inactivation of bacteria.•LTOH cooking could be used effectively for meat sterilization. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.09.007 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1847888380</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0309174016302728</els_id><sourcerecordid>1847888380</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-181fa73038986a707f47fa45c99153492562117e0bf31e577d40dc87816f803e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU1v1DAQtRCILgs_AeQjl4RxnMTOCZWKL6kCqYWz5TiTrbd2vNhJq_0r_Fq87LbXniy_efPezDxC3jIoGbD2w7b0qOdkbFnlbwldCSCekRWTghc14_I5WQGHrmCihjPyKqUtADBeyZfkrBJt20DbrcjfT9rMGK12dLB3GJOd91RP2u2TTTSMdBfiLXVh2tiUrF8SdYvvQ1w8HYNz4d5Om_9lmlU8DTfeGmpCuD3gehrovc4F2uv55hHus4PfOWvCRBP-WXAyBzibsfaaxqsf53SDE74mL0btEr45vWvy-8vnXxffisufX79fnF8WhrfNXDDJRi04cNnJVgsQYy1GXTem61jD665q2ooxgdCPnGEjxFDDYKSQrB0lcORr8v6ou4shD5Nm5W0y6JyeMCxJMVkLKSXP5DVpjlQTQ0oRR7WL1uu4VwzUIRa1VadY1CEWBZ3KseS-dyeLpfc4PHY95JAJH48EzIveWYwqS-S74GAjmlkNwT5h8Q81P6K4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1847888380</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bacterial diversity analysis of pork longissimus lumborum following long term ohmic cooking and water bath cooking by amplicon sequencing of 16S rRNA gene</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Tian, Xiaojing ; Wu, Wei ; Yu, Qianqian ; Hou, Man ; Gao, Fang ; Li, Xingmin ; Dai, Ruitong</creator><creatorcontrib>Tian, Xiaojing ; Wu, Wei ; Yu, Qianqian ; Hou, Man ; Gao, Fang ; Li, Xingmin ; Dai, Ruitong</creatorcontrib><description>The bacterial ecology of long term ohmic- (LTOH) and water bath- (WB) cooked pork longissimus lumborum during refrigerated storage was investigated by culture-dependent and amplicon sequencing of 16S rRNA gene. High bacterial diversity was observed in both LTOH- and WB-cooked meat, and the diversity decreased with prolonged storage, however, it was more complex in LTOH-cooked meat compared with WB treated ones. Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Enterococcus and Lactococcus were the most prevalent genera in the first two weeks and were replaced by Carnobacterium by the end of storage. Brevundimonas, Bacteroidaceae, Lactobacillaceae, uncultured Clostridiales Family_XIII, Alcaligenaceae and Micrococcales were more abundant in LTOH-cooked meat, while only Moraxellaceae were more abundant in WB-cooked samples. The different abundances may have resulted from the reaction of bacteria to different heating mechanisms. Overall, LTOH-cooked meat has a similar shelf-life with shorter processing time compared to WB treated ones.
•The bacterial diversity was more complex in LTOH-cooked meat.•Bacillus, etc. were the dominant genera in the first two weeks for both treatments.•Carnobacterium was the main genus by the end of storage for both cooking methods.•Electric current of LTOH cooking may exert some effect on inactivation of bacteria.•LTOH cooking could be used effectively for meat sterilization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0309-1740</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4138</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.09.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27665069</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Amplicon sequencing ; Animals ; Bacillus - isolation & purification ; Bacterial diversity ; Carnobacterium - isolation & purification ; Clostridiales - isolation & purification ; Colony Count, Microbial ; Cooking - methods ; DNA, Bacterial - isolation & purification ; Enterococcus - isolation & purification ; Food Contamination - analysis ; Food Microbiology ; Hot Temperature ; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration ; Lactobacillaceae - isolation & purification ; Lactococcus - isolation & purification ; Microbial Viability ; Nitrogen - analysis ; Ohmic cooking ; Pork ; Pseudomonas - isolation & purification ; Red Meat - analysis ; Red Meat - microbiology ; Refrigerated storage ; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - isolation & purification ; Sequence Analysis, DNA ; Swine ; Volatile Organic Compounds - analysis ; Water bath cooking]]></subject><ispartof>Meat science, 2017-01, Vol.123, p.97-104</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-181fa73038986a707f47fa45c99153492562117e0bf31e577d40dc87816f803e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-181fa73038986a707f47fa45c99153492562117e0bf31e577d40dc87816f803e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27665069$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tian, Xiaojing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Qianqian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hou, Man</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xingmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dai, Ruitong</creatorcontrib><title>Bacterial diversity analysis of pork longissimus lumborum following long term ohmic cooking and water bath cooking by amplicon sequencing of 16S rRNA gene</title><title>Meat science</title><addtitle>Meat Sci</addtitle><description>The bacterial ecology of long term ohmic- (LTOH) and water bath- (WB) cooked pork longissimus lumborum during refrigerated storage was investigated by culture-dependent and amplicon sequencing of 16S rRNA gene. High bacterial diversity was observed in both LTOH- and WB-cooked meat, and the diversity decreased with prolonged storage, however, it was more complex in LTOH-cooked meat compared with WB treated ones. Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Enterococcus and Lactococcus were the most prevalent genera in the first two weeks and were replaced by Carnobacterium by the end of storage. Brevundimonas, Bacteroidaceae, Lactobacillaceae, uncultured Clostridiales Family_XIII, Alcaligenaceae and Micrococcales were more abundant in LTOH-cooked meat, while only Moraxellaceae were more abundant in WB-cooked samples. The different abundances may have resulted from the reaction of bacteria to different heating mechanisms. Overall, LTOH-cooked meat has a similar shelf-life with shorter processing time compared to WB treated ones.
•The bacterial diversity was more complex in LTOH-cooked meat.•Bacillus, etc. were the dominant genera in the first two weeks for both treatments.•Carnobacterium was the main genus by the end of storage for both cooking methods.•Electric current of LTOH cooking may exert some effect on inactivation of bacteria.•LTOH cooking could be used effectively for meat sterilization.</description><subject>Amplicon sequencing</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bacillus - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Bacterial diversity</subject><subject>Carnobacterium - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Clostridiales - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial</subject><subject>Cooking - methods</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Enterococcus - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Food Contamination - analysis</subject><subject>Food Microbiology</subject><subject>Hot Temperature</subject><subject>Hydrogen-Ion Concentration</subject><subject>Lactobacillaceae - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Lactococcus - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Microbial Viability</subject><subject>Nitrogen - analysis</subject><subject>Ohmic cooking</subject><subject>Pork</subject><subject>Pseudomonas - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Red Meat - analysis</subject><subject>Red Meat - microbiology</subject><subject>Refrigerated storage</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Sequence Analysis, DNA</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Volatile Organic Compounds - analysis</subject><subject>Water bath cooking</subject><issn>0309-1740</issn><issn>1873-4138</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUU1v1DAQtRCILgs_AeQjl4RxnMTOCZWKL6kCqYWz5TiTrbd2vNhJq_0r_Fq87LbXniy_efPezDxC3jIoGbD2w7b0qOdkbFnlbwldCSCekRWTghc14_I5WQGHrmCihjPyKqUtADBeyZfkrBJt20DbrcjfT9rMGK12dLB3GJOd91RP2u2TTTSMdBfiLXVh2tiUrF8SdYvvQ1w8HYNz4d5Om_9lmlU8DTfeGmpCuD3gehrovc4F2uv55hHus4PfOWvCRBP-WXAyBzibsfaaxqsf53SDE74mL0btEr45vWvy-8vnXxffisufX79fnF8WhrfNXDDJRi04cNnJVgsQYy1GXTem61jD665q2ooxgdCPnGEjxFDDYKSQrB0lcORr8v6ou4shD5Nm5W0y6JyeMCxJMVkLKSXP5DVpjlQTQ0oRR7WL1uu4VwzUIRa1VadY1CEWBZ3KseS-dyeLpfc4PHY95JAJH48EzIveWYwqS-S74GAjmlkNwT5h8Q81P6K4</recordid><startdate>201701</startdate><enddate>201701</enddate><creator>Tian, Xiaojing</creator><creator>Wu, Wei</creator><creator>Yu, Qianqian</creator><creator>Hou, Man</creator><creator>Gao, Fang</creator><creator>Li, Xingmin</creator><creator>Dai, Ruitong</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201701</creationdate><title>Bacterial diversity analysis of pork longissimus lumborum following long term ohmic cooking and water bath cooking by amplicon sequencing of 16S rRNA gene</title><author>Tian, Xiaojing ; Wu, Wei ; Yu, Qianqian ; Hou, Man ; Gao, Fang ; Li, Xingmin ; Dai, Ruitong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-181fa73038986a707f47fa45c99153492562117e0bf31e577d40dc87816f803e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Amplicon sequencing</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bacillus - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Bacterial diversity</topic><topic>Carnobacterium - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Clostridiales - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial</topic><topic>Cooking - methods</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Enterococcus - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Food Contamination - analysis</topic><topic>Food Microbiology</topic><topic>Hot Temperature</topic><topic>Hydrogen-Ion Concentration</topic><topic>Lactobacillaceae - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Lactococcus - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Microbial Viability</topic><topic>Nitrogen - analysis</topic><topic>Ohmic cooking</topic><topic>Pork</topic><topic>Pseudomonas - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Red Meat - analysis</topic><topic>Red Meat - microbiology</topic><topic>Refrigerated storage</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Sequence Analysis, DNA</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Volatile Organic Compounds - analysis</topic><topic>Water bath cooking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tian, Xiaojing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Qianqian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hou, Man</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xingmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dai, Ruitong</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Meat science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tian, Xiaojing</au><au>Wu, Wei</au><au>Yu, Qianqian</au><au>Hou, Man</au><au>Gao, Fang</au><au>Li, Xingmin</au><au>Dai, Ruitong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bacterial diversity analysis of pork longissimus lumborum following long term ohmic cooking and water bath cooking by amplicon sequencing of 16S rRNA gene</atitle><jtitle>Meat science</jtitle><addtitle>Meat Sci</addtitle><date>2017-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>123</volume><spage>97</spage><epage>104</epage><pages>97-104</pages><issn>0309-1740</issn><eissn>1873-4138</eissn><abstract>The bacterial ecology of long term ohmic- (LTOH) and water bath- (WB) cooked pork longissimus lumborum during refrigerated storage was investigated by culture-dependent and amplicon sequencing of 16S rRNA gene. High bacterial diversity was observed in both LTOH- and WB-cooked meat, and the diversity decreased with prolonged storage, however, it was more complex in LTOH-cooked meat compared with WB treated ones. Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Enterococcus and Lactococcus were the most prevalent genera in the first two weeks and were replaced by Carnobacterium by the end of storage. Brevundimonas, Bacteroidaceae, Lactobacillaceae, uncultured Clostridiales Family_XIII, Alcaligenaceae and Micrococcales were more abundant in LTOH-cooked meat, while only Moraxellaceae were more abundant in WB-cooked samples. The different abundances may have resulted from the reaction of bacteria to different heating mechanisms. Overall, LTOH-cooked meat has a similar shelf-life with shorter processing time compared to WB treated ones.
•The bacterial diversity was more complex in LTOH-cooked meat.•Bacillus, etc. were the dominant genera in the first two weeks for both treatments.•Carnobacterium was the main genus by the end of storage for both cooking methods.•Electric current of LTOH cooking may exert some effect on inactivation of bacteria.•LTOH cooking could be used effectively for meat sterilization.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>27665069</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.09.007</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0309-1740 |
ispartof | Meat science, 2017-01, Vol.123, p.97-104 |
issn | 0309-1740 1873-4138 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1847888380 |
source | Elsevier |
subjects | Amplicon sequencing Animals Bacillus - isolation & purification Bacterial diversity Carnobacterium - isolation & purification Clostridiales - isolation & purification Colony Count, Microbial Cooking - methods DNA, Bacterial - isolation & purification Enterococcus - isolation & purification Food Contamination - analysis Food Microbiology Hot Temperature Hydrogen-Ion Concentration Lactobacillaceae - isolation & purification Lactococcus - isolation & purification Microbial Viability Nitrogen - analysis Ohmic cooking Pork Pseudomonas - isolation & purification Red Meat - analysis Red Meat - microbiology Refrigerated storage RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - isolation & purification Sequence Analysis, DNA Swine Volatile Organic Compounds - analysis Water bath cooking |
title | Bacterial diversity analysis of pork longissimus lumborum following long term ohmic cooking and water bath cooking by amplicon sequencing of 16S rRNA gene |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T10%3A47%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bacterial%20diversity%20analysis%20of%20pork%20longissimus%20lumborum%20following%20long%20term%20ohmic%20cooking%20and%20water%20bath%20cooking%20by%20amplicon%20sequencing%20of%2016S%20rRNA%20gene&rft.jtitle=Meat%20science&rft.au=Tian,%20Xiaojing&rft.date=2017-01&rft.volume=123&rft.spage=97&rft.epage=104&rft.pages=97-104&rft.issn=0309-1740&rft.eissn=1873-4138&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.09.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1847888380%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-181fa73038986a707f47fa45c99153492562117e0bf31e577d40dc87816f803e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1847888380&rft_id=info:pmid/27665069&rfr_iscdi=true |