Theory of mind and Verstehen (understanding) methodology

Theory of mind is a prominent, but highly controversial, field in psychology, psychiatry, and philosophy of mind. Simulation theory, theory-theory and other views have been presented in recent decades, none of which are monolithic. In this article, various views on theory of mind are reviewed, and m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:History of psychiatry 2016-09, Vol.27 (3), p.253-267
Main Author: Kumazaki, Tsutomu
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 267
container_issue 3
container_start_page 253
container_title History of psychiatry
container_volume 27
creator Kumazaki, Tsutomu
description Theory of mind is a prominent, but highly controversial, field in psychology, psychiatry, and philosophy of mind. Simulation theory, theory-theory and other views have been presented in recent decades, none of which are monolithic. In this article, various views on theory of mind are reviewed, and methodological problems within each view are investigated. The relationship between simulation theory and Verstehen (understanding) methodology in traditional human sciences is an intriguing issue, although the latter is not a direct ancestor of the former. From that perspective, lessons for current clinical psychiatry are drawn. (Author abstract)
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0957154X1665079
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1848857548</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1848857548</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_18488575483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVissOgjAURBujifhYu-0SF2gvtLSsjcYPIMYdIXJ5mNIqhQV_ryT-gIvJZM4ZQnbADgBSHlkiJAh-hzgWTCYz4oHkLAijmM2JN9lg0kuycu7JWMgVKI-otEbbjdSWtG1MQfNvbti5Hms01B9MMY0vbUy1py32tS2sttW4IYsy1w63v14T_3JOT9fg1dn3gK7P2sY9UOvcoB1cBoorJaTgKvrj-gGqQ0Cb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1848857548</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Theory of mind and Verstehen (understanding) methodology</title><source>Humanities Index</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Kumazaki, Tsutomu</creator><creatorcontrib>Kumazaki, Tsutomu</creatorcontrib><description>Theory of mind is a prominent, but highly controversial, field in psychology, psychiatry, and philosophy of mind. Simulation theory, theory-theory and other views have been presented in recent decades, none of which are monolithic. In this article, various views on theory of mind are reviewed, and methodological problems within each view are investigated. The relationship between simulation theory and Verstehen (understanding) methodology in traditional human sciences is an intriguing issue, although the latter is not a direct ancestor of the former. From that perspective, lessons for current clinical psychiatry are drawn. (Author abstract)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0957-154X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1740-2360</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0957154X1665079</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>History of psychiatry, 2016-09, Vol.27 (3), p.253-267</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,33848</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kumazaki, Tsutomu</creatorcontrib><title>Theory of mind and Verstehen (understanding) methodology</title><title>History of psychiatry</title><description>Theory of mind is a prominent, but highly controversial, field in psychology, psychiatry, and philosophy of mind. Simulation theory, theory-theory and other views have been presented in recent decades, none of which are monolithic. In this article, various views on theory of mind are reviewed, and methodological problems within each view are investigated. The relationship between simulation theory and Verstehen (understanding) methodology in traditional human sciences is an intriguing issue, although the latter is not a direct ancestor of the former. From that perspective, lessons for current clinical psychiatry are drawn. (Author abstract)</description><issn>0957-154X</issn><issn>1740-2360</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C18</sourceid><recordid>eNqVissOgjAURBujifhYu-0SF2gvtLSsjcYPIMYdIXJ5mNIqhQV_ryT-gIvJZM4ZQnbADgBSHlkiJAh-hzgWTCYz4oHkLAijmM2JN9lg0kuycu7JWMgVKI-otEbbjdSWtG1MQfNvbti5Hms01B9MMY0vbUy1py32tS2sttW4IYsy1w63v14T_3JOT9fg1dn3gK7P2sY9UOvcoB1cBoorJaTgKvrj-gGqQ0Cb</recordid><startdate>20160901</startdate><enddate>20160901</enddate><creator>Kumazaki, Tsutomu</creator><scope>C18</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160901</creationdate><title>Theory of mind and Verstehen (understanding) methodology</title><author>Kumazaki, Tsutomu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_18488575483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kumazaki, Tsutomu</creatorcontrib><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>History of psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kumazaki, Tsutomu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Theory of mind and Verstehen (understanding) methodology</atitle><jtitle>History of psychiatry</jtitle><date>2016-09-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>253</spage><epage>267</epage><pages>253-267</pages><issn>0957-154X</issn><eissn>1740-2360</eissn><abstract>Theory of mind is a prominent, but highly controversial, field in psychology, psychiatry, and philosophy of mind. Simulation theory, theory-theory and other views have been presented in recent decades, none of which are monolithic. In this article, various views on theory of mind are reviewed, and methodological problems within each view are investigated. The relationship between simulation theory and Verstehen (understanding) methodology in traditional human sciences is an intriguing issue, although the latter is not a direct ancestor of the former. From that perspective, lessons for current clinical psychiatry are drawn. (Author abstract)</abstract><doi>10.1177/0957154X1665079</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0957-154X
ispartof History of psychiatry, 2016-09, Vol.27 (3), p.253-267
issn 0957-154X
1740-2360
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1848857548
source Humanities Index; SAGE
title Theory of mind and Verstehen (understanding) methodology
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T23%3A54%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Theory%20of%20mind%20and%20Verstehen%20(understanding)%20methodology&rft.jtitle=History%20of%20psychiatry&rft.au=Kumazaki,%20Tsutomu&rft.date=2016-09-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=253&rft.epage=267&rft.pages=253-267&rft.issn=0957-154X&rft.eissn=1740-2360&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0957154X1665079&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1848857548%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_18488575483%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1848857548&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true