Loading…

Litter Dynamics and Phenology of Melaleuca quinquenervia in South Florida

We monitored litterfall biomass at six different sites of melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia (Cav.) S.T. Blake) forested wetlands in South Florida from July 1997 to June 1999. Annual litterfall of melaleuca varied between sites from 6.5 to 9.9 t dry wt ha super(-1) yr super(-1) over the two-year per...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of aquatic plant management 2002-01, Vol.40, p.22-27
Main Authors: Van, T K, Rayachhetry, M B, Center, T D, Pratt, P D
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 27
container_issue
container_start_page 22
container_title Journal of aquatic plant management
container_volume 40
creator Van, T K
Rayachhetry, M B
Center, T D
Pratt, P D
description We monitored litterfall biomass at six different sites of melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia (Cav.) S.T. Blake) forested wetlands in South Florida from July 1997 to June 1999. Annual litterfall of melaleuca varied between sites from 6.5 to 9.9 t dry wt ha super(-1) yr super(-1) over the two-year period. Litterfall was significantly higher (P < 0.001) in seasonally flooded habitats (9.3 t ha super(-1) yr super(-1)) than in non-flooded (7.5 t ha super(-1) yr super(-1)) and permanently flooded habitats (8.0 t ha super(-1) yr super(-1)). Leaf fall was the major component forming 70% of the total litter, woody material 16%, and reproductive material 11%. Phenology of flowering and leaf flush was investigated by examination of the timing and duration of the fall of different plant parts in the litter traps, coupled with monthly field observations during the two-year study. In both years, flowering began in October and November, with peak flower production around December, and was essentially completed by February and March. New shoot growth began in mid winter after peak flowering, and extended into the spring. Very little new growth was observed in melaleuca forests during the summer months, from May to August, in South Florida. In contrast, the fall of leaves and small wood was recorded in every month of the year, but generally increased during the dry season with higher levels observed from February to April. Also, no seasonality was recorded in the fall of seed capsules, which apparently resulted from the continual self-thinning of small branches and twigs inside the forest stand. In planning management for perennial weeds, it is important to determine the period during its annual growth cycle when the plant is most susceptible to control measures. These phenological data suggest that the appropriate time for melaleuca control in South Florida might be during late winter and early spring, when the plant is most active.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18488696</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>309867996</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p217t-f4cf710d77c156954afd03ad5c3b5ae8a45b1fb91481df2e8e9c1676aa43c3493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9js1KAzEYAPegYK2-Q07iZSHZ_B-lWi1UFNRz-Tb5YiNp0m52hb69BT17msswzFkzo0yoVqmOXzSXtX5RKq3t1KxZreM44kDujxl20VUC2ZPXLeaSyueRlECeMUHCyQE5TDEfJsw4fEcgMZO3Mo1bskxliB6umvMAqeL1H-fNx_LhffHUrl8eV4u7dbvvmB7bIFzQjHqtHZPKSgHBUw5eOt5LQANC9iz0lgnDfOjQoHVMaQUguOPC8nlz89vdD-V0U8fNLlaHKUHGMtUNM8IYZdVJvP1f1NZowagS_Ae7FVeE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1798741064</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Litter Dynamics and Phenology of Melaleuca quinquenervia in South Florida</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Van, T K ; Rayachhetry, M B ; Center, T D ; Pratt, P D</creator><creatorcontrib>Van, T K ; Rayachhetry, M B ; Center, T D ; Pratt, P D</creatorcontrib><description>We monitored litterfall biomass at six different sites of melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia (Cav.) S.T. Blake) forested wetlands in South Florida from July 1997 to June 1999. Annual litterfall of melaleuca varied between sites from 6.5 to 9.9 t dry wt ha super(-1) yr super(-1) over the two-year period. Litterfall was significantly higher (P &lt; 0.001) in seasonally flooded habitats (9.3 t ha super(-1) yr super(-1)) than in non-flooded (7.5 t ha super(-1) yr super(-1)) and permanently flooded habitats (8.0 t ha super(-1) yr super(-1)). Leaf fall was the major component forming 70% of the total litter, woody material 16%, and reproductive material 11%. Phenology of flowering and leaf flush was investigated by examination of the timing and duration of the fall of different plant parts in the litter traps, coupled with monthly field observations during the two-year study. In both years, flowering began in October and November, with peak flower production around December, and was essentially completed by February and March. New shoot growth began in mid winter after peak flowering, and extended into the spring. Very little new growth was observed in melaleuca forests during the summer months, from May to August, in South Florida. In contrast, the fall of leaves and small wood was recorded in every month of the year, but generally increased during the dry season with higher levels observed from February to April. Also, no seasonality was recorded in the fall of seed capsules, which apparently resulted from the continual self-thinning of small branches and twigs inside the forest stand. In planning management for perennial weeds, it is important to determine the period during its annual growth cycle when the plant is most susceptible to control measures. These phenological data suggest that the appropriate time for melaleuca control in South Florida might be during late winter and early spring, when the plant is most active.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-6623</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Melaleuca quinquenervia ; USA, Florida</subject><ispartof>Journal of aquatic plant management, 2002-01, Vol.40, p.22-27</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Van, T K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rayachhetry, M B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Center, T D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pratt, P D</creatorcontrib><title>Litter Dynamics and Phenology of Melaleuca quinquenervia in South Florida</title><title>Journal of aquatic plant management</title><description>We monitored litterfall biomass at six different sites of melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia (Cav.) S.T. Blake) forested wetlands in South Florida from July 1997 to June 1999. Annual litterfall of melaleuca varied between sites from 6.5 to 9.9 t dry wt ha super(-1) yr super(-1) over the two-year period. Litterfall was significantly higher (P &lt; 0.001) in seasonally flooded habitats (9.3 t ha super(-1) yr super(-1)) than in non-flooded (7.5 t ha super(-1) yr super(-1)) and permanently flooded habitats (8.0 t ha super(-1) yr super(-1)). Leaf fall was the major component forming 70% of the total litter, woody material 16%, and reproductive material 11%. Phenology of flowering and leaf flush was investigated by examination of the timing and duration of the fall of different plant parts in the litter traps, coupled with monthly field observations during the two-year study. In both years, flowering began in October and November, with peak flower production around December, and was essentially completed by February and March. New shoot growth began in mid winter after peak flowering, and extended into the spring. Very little new growth was observed in melaleuca forests during the summer months, from May to August, in South Florida. In contrast, the fall of leaves and small wood was recorded in every month of the year, but generally increased during the dry season with higher levels observed from February to April. Also, no seasonality was recorded in the fall of seed capsules, which apparently resulted from the continual self-thinning of small branches and twigs inside the forest stand. In planning management for perennial weeds, it is important to determine the period during its annual growth cycle when the plant is most susceptible to control measures. These phenological data suggest that the appropriate time for melaleuca control in South Florida might be during late winter and early spring, when the plant is most active.</description><subject>Melaleuca quinquenervia</subject><subject>USA, Florida</subject><issn>0146-6623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9js1KAzEYAPegYK2-Q07iZSHZ_B-lWi1UFNRz-Tb5YiNp0m52hb69BT17msswzFkzo0yoVqmOXzSXtX5RKq3t1KxZreM44kDujxl20VUC2ZPXLeaSyueRlECeMUHCyQE5TDEfJsw4fEcgMZO3Mo1bskxliB6umvMAqeL1H-fNx_LhffHUrl8eV4u7dbvvmB7bIFzQjHqtHZPKSgHBUw5eOt5LQANC9iz0lgnDfOjQoHVMaQUguOPC8nlz89vdD-V0U8fNLlaHKUHGMtUNM8IYZdVJvP1f1NZowagS_Ae7FVeE</recordid><startdate>20020101</startdate><enddate>20020101</enddate><creator>Van, T K</creator><creator>Rayachhetry, M B</creator><creator>Center, T D</creator><creator>Pratt, P D</creator><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020101</creationdate><title>Litter Dynamics and Phenology of Melaleuca quinquenervia in South Florida</title><author>Van, T K ; Rayachhetry, M B ; Center, T D ; Pratt, P D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p217t-f4cf710d77c156954afd03ad5c3b5ae8a45b1fb91481df2e8e9c1676aa43c3493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Melaleuca quinquenervia</topic><topic>USA, Florida</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Van, T K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rayachhetry, M B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Center, T D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pratt, P D</creatorcontrib><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of aquatic plant management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Van, T K</au><au>Rayachhetry, M B</au><au>Center, T D</au><au>Pratt, P D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Litter Dynamics and Phenology of Melaleuca quinquenervia in South Florida</atitle><jtitle>Journal of aquatic plant management</jtitle><date>2002-01-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>40</volume><spage>22</spage><epage>27</epage><pages>22-27</pages><issn>0146-6623</issn><abstract>We monitored litterfall biomass at six different sites of melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia (Cav.) S.T. Blake) forested wetlands in South Florida from July 1997 to June 1999. Annual litterfall of melaleuca varied between sites from 6.5 to 9.9 t dry wt ha super(-1) yr super(-1) over the two-year period. Litterfall was significantly higher (P &lt; 0.001) in seasonally flooded habitats (9.3 t ha super(-1) yr super(-1)) than in non-flooded (7.5 t ha super(-1) yr super(-1)) and permanently flooded habitats (8.0 t ha super(-1) yr super(-1)). Leaf fall was the major component forming 70% of the total litter, woody material 16%, and reproductive material 11%. Phenology of flowering and leaf flush was investigated by examination of the timing and duration of the fall of different plant parts in the litter traps, coupled with monthly field observations during the two-year study. In both years, flowering began in October and November, with peak flower production around December, and was essentially completed by February and March. New shoot growth began in mid winter after peak flowering, and extended into the spring. Very little new growth was observed in melaleuca forests during the summer months, from May to August, in South Florida. In contrast, the fall of leaves and small wood was recorded in every month of the year, but generally increased during the dry season with higher levels observed from February to April. Also, no seasonality was recorded in the fall of seed capsules, which apparently resulted from the continual self-thinning of small branches and twigs inside the forest stand. In planning management for perennial weeds, it is important to determine the period during its annual growth cycle when the plant is most susceptible to control measures. These phenological data suggest that the appropriate time for melaleuca control in South Florida might be during late winter and early spring, when the plant is most active.</abstract><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0146-6623
ispartof Journal of aquatic plant management, 2002-01, Vol.40, p.22-27
issn 0146-6623
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18488696
source EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Melaleuca quinquenervia
USA, Florida
title Litter Dynamics and Phenology of Melaleuca quinquenervia in South Florida
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-24T03%3A59%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Litter%20Dynamics%20and%20Phenology%20of%20Melaleuca%20quinquenervia%20in%20South%20Florida&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20aquatic%20plant%20management&rft.au=Van,%20T%20K&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=40&rft.spage=22&rft.epage=27&rft.pages=22-27&rft.issn=0146-6623&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E309867996%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p217t-f4cf710d77c156954afd03ad5c3b5ae8a45b1fb91481df2e8e9c1676aa43c3493%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1798741064&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true