Loading…
DMSP and DMS dynamics and microzooplankton grazing in the Labrador Sea: application of the dilution technique
We adapted the dilution technique to study microzooplankton grazing of algal dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) vs. Chl a, and to estimate the impact of microzooplankton grazing on dimethyl sulfide (DMS) production in the Labrador Sea. Phytoplankton numbers were dominated by autotrophic nanoflagellat...
Saved in:
Published in: | Deep-sea research. Part I, Oceanographic research papers Oceanographic research papers, 2000-12, Vol.47 (12), p.2243-2264 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-9bc6c5c6cc1f9903ec52e57678ba6323ff2e4eef75ec966a5be4b78b4f36ce533 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-9bc6c5c6cc1f9903ec52e57678ba6323ff2e4eef75ec966a5be4b78b4f36ce533 |
container_end_page | 2264 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2243 |
container_title | Deep-sea research. Part I, Oceanographic research papers |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Wolfe, Gordon V Levasseur, Maurice Cantin, Guy Michaud, Sonia |
description | We adapted the dilution technique to study microzooplankton grazing of algal dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) vs. Chl
a, and to estimate the impact of microzooplankton grazing on dimethyl sulfide (DMS) production in the Labrador Sea. Phytoplankton numbers were dominated by autotrophic nanoflagellates in the Labrador basin, but diatoms and colonial
Phaeocystis pouchetii contributed significantly to phytomass at several high chlorophyll stations and on the Newfoundland and Greenland shelfs. Throughout the region, growth of algal Chl
a and DMSP was generally high (0.2–1
d
−
1), but grazing rates were lower and more variable, characteristic of the early spring bloom period. Production and consumption of Chl
a vs. DMSP followed no clear pattern, and sometimes diverged greatly, likely because of their differing distributions among algal prey taxa and size class. In several experiments where
Phaeocystis was abundant, we observed DMS production proportional to grazing rate, and we found clear evidence of DMS production by this haptophyte following physical stress such as sparging or filtration. It is possible that grazing-activated DMSP cleavage by
Phaeocystis contributes to grazer deterrence: protozoa and copepods apparently avoided healthy colonies (as judged by relative growth and grazing rates of Chl
a and DMSP), and grazing of
Phaeocystis was significant only at one station where cells were in poor condition. Although we hoped to examine selective grazing on or against DMSP-containing algal prey, the dilution technique cannot differentiate selective ingestion and varying digestion rates of Chl
a and DMSP. We also found that the dilution method alone was poorly suited for assessing the impact of grazing on dissolved sulfur pools, because of rapid microbial consumption and the artifactual release of DMSP and DMS during filtration. Measuring and understanding the many processes affecting organosulfur cycling by the microbial food web in natural populations remain a technical challenge that will likely require a combination of techniques to address. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0967-0637(00)00028-5 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18501442</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0967063700000285</els_id><sourcerecordid>17719368</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-9bc6c5c6cc1f9903ec52e57678ba6323ff2e4eef75ec966a5be4b78b4f36ce533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LxDAQhntQcP34CUIQET1Uk7ZJGy8i6yesKKyeQ5pO1mg3qUlX0F9vtisKXjyETGaemcnMmyS7BB8TTNjJFHNWppjl5SHGRxjjrErpWjL6cW8kmyG8xABhFR4l84u76QOStkHRQM2HlXOjwuCIhnefznWttK-9s2jm5aexM2Qs6p8BTWTtZeM8moI8RbLrWqNkbyLo9AA0pl0M7x7UszVvC9hO1rVsA-x831vJ09Xl4_gmndxf347PJ6kqMtqnvFZM0XgU0ZzjHBTNgJasrGrJ8izXOoMCQJcUFGdM0hqKOgYLnTMFNM-3koNV3c672Db0Ym6CgjZOAm4RBKkoJkWR_Q-WJeE5qyK49wd8cQtv4xCCxC9wXvBlNbqC4uJC8KBF581c-g9BsFjKIwZ5xFIHgbEY5BE05u1_F5dByVZ7aZUJv8kUV1W2xM5WGMTVvRvwIigDVkFjPKheNM780-gLAmKmQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>196699492</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>DMSP and DMS dynamics and microzooplankton grazing in the Labrador Sea: application of the dilution technique</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Wolfe, Gordon V ; Levasseur, Maurice ; Cantin, Guy ; Michaud, Sonia</creator><creatorcontrib>Wolfe, Gordon V ; Levasseur, Maurice ; Cantin, Guy ; Michaud, Sonia</creatorcontrib><description>We adapted the dilution technique to study microzooplankton grazing of algal dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) vs. Chl
a, and to estimate the impact of microzooplankton grazing on dimethyl sulfide (DMS) production in the Labrador Sea. Phytoplankton numbers were dominated by autotrophic nanoflagellates in the Labrador basin, but diatoms and colonial
Phaeocystis pouchetii contributed significantly to phytomass at several high chlorophyll stations and on the Newfoundland and Greenland shelfs. Throughout the region, growth of algal Chl
a and DMSP was generally high (0.2–1
d
−
1), but grazing rates were lower and more variable, characteristic of the early spring bloom period. Production and consumption of Chl
a vs. DMSP followed no clear pattern, and sometimes diverged greatly, likely because of their differing distributions among algal prey taxa and size class. In several experiments where
Phaeocystis was abundant, we observed DMS production proportional to grazing rate, and we found clear evidence of DMS production by this haptophyte following physical stress such as sparging or filtration. It is possible that grazing-activated DMSP cleavage by
Phaeocystis contributes to grazer deterrence: protozoa and copepods apparently avoided healthy colonies (as judged by relative growth and grazing rates of Chl
a and DMSP), and grazing of
Phaeocystis was significant only at one station where cells were in poor condition. Although we hoped to examine selective grazing on or against DMSP-containing algal prey, the dilution technique cannot differentiate selective ingestion and varying digestion rates of Chl
a and DMSP. We also found that the dilution method alone was poorly suited for assessing the impact of grazing on dissolved sulfur pools, because of rapid microbial consumption and the artifactual release of DMSP and DMS during filtration. Measuring and understanding the many processes affecting organosulfur cycling by the microbial food web in natural populations remain a technical challenge that will likely require a combination of techniques to address.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0967-0637</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0967-0637(00)00028-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Algae ; Animal behavior ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Dimethyl sulfide ; Dimethylsulfoniopropionate ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects. Techniques ; Marine biology ; Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...) ; Oceanography ; Phaeocystis pouchetii ; Plankton ; Protozoa ; Selective feeding ; Trophic interactions</subject><ispartof>Deep-sea research. Part I, Oceanographic research papers, 2000-12, Vol.47 (12), p.2243-2264</ispartof><rights>2000</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Dec 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-9bc6c5c6cc1f9903ec52e57678ba6323ff2e4eef75ec966a5be4b78b4f36ce533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-9bc6c5c6cc1f9903ec52e57678ba6323ff2e4eef75ec966a5be4b78b4f36ce533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1508825$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wolfe, Gordon V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levasseur, Maurice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cantin, Guy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michaud, Sonia</creatorcontrib><title>DMSP and DMS dynamics and microzooplankton grazing in the Labrador Sea: application of the dilution technique</title><title>Deep-sea research. Part I, Oceanographic research papers</title><description>We adapted the dilution technique to study microzooplankton grazing of algal dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) vs. Chl
a, and to estimate the impact of microzooplankton grazing on dimethyl sulfide (DMS) production in the Labrador Sea. Phytoplankton numbers were dominated by autotrophic nanoflagellates in the Labrador basin, but diatoms and colonial
Phaeocystis pouchetii contributed significantly to phytomass at several high chlorophyll stations and on the Newfoundland and Greenland shelfs. Throughout the region, growth of algal Chl
a and DMSP was generally high (0.2–1
d
−
1), but grazing rates were lower and more variable, characteristic of the early spring bloom period. Production and consumption of Chl
a vs. DMSP followed no clear pattern, and sometimes diverged greatly, likely because of their differing distributions among algal prey taxa and size class. In several experiments where
Phaeocystis was abundant, we observed DMS production proportional to grazing rate, and we found clear evidence of DMS production by this haptophyte following physical stress such as sparging or filtration. It is possible that grazing-activated DMSP cleavage by
Phaeocystis contributes to grazer deterrence: protozoa and copepods apparently avoided healthy colonies (as judged by relative growth and grazing rates of Chl
a and DMSP), and grazing of
Phaeocystis was significant only at one station where cells were in poor condition. Although we hoped to examine selective grazing on or against DMSP-containing algal prey, the dilution technique cannot differentiate selective ingestion and varying digestion rates of Chl
a and DMSP. We also found that the dilution method alone was poorly suited for assessing the impact of grazing on dissolved sulfur pools, because of rapid microbial consumption and the artifactual release of DMSP and DMS during filtration. Measuring and understanding the many processes affecting organosulfur cycling by the microbial food web in natural populations remain a technical challenge that will likely require a combination of techniques to address.</description><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Dimethyl sulfide</subject><subject>Dimethylsulfoniopropionate</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects. Techniques</subject><subject>Marine biology</subject><subject>Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...)</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Phaeocystis pouchetii</subject><subject>Plankton</subject><subject>Protozoa</subject><subject>Selective feeding</subject><subject>Trophic interactions</subject><issn>0967-0637</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1LxDAQhntQcP34CUIQET1Uk7ZJGy8i6yesKKyeQ5pO1mg3qUlX0F9vtisKXjyETGaemcnMmyS7BB8TTNjJFHNWppjl5SHGRxjjrErpWjL6cW8kmyG8xABhFR4l84u76QOStkHRQM2HlXOjwuCIhnefznWttK-9s2jm5aexM2Qs6p8BTWTtZeM8moI8RbLrWqNkbyLo9AA0pl0M7x7UszVvC9hO1rVsA-x831vJ09Xl4_gmndxf347PJ6kqMtqnvFZM0XgU0ZzjHBTNgJasrGrJ8izXOoMCQJcUFGdM0hqKOgYLnTMFNM-3koNV3c672Db0Ym6CgjZOAm4RBKkoJkWR_Q-WJeE5qyK49wd8cQtv4xCCxC9wXvBlNbqC4uJC8KBF581c-g9BsFjKIwZ5xFIHgbEY5BE05u1_F5dByVZ7aZUJv8kUV1W2xM5WGMTVvRvwIigDVkFjPKheNM780-gLAmKmQw</recordid><startdate>20001201</startdate><enddate>20001201</enddate><creator>Wolfe, Gordon V</creator><creator>Levasseur, Maurice</creator><creator>Cantin, Guy</creator><creator>Michaud, Sonia</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20001201</creationdate><title>DMSP and DMS dynamics and microzooplankton grazing in the Labrador Sea: application of the dilution technique</title><author>Wolfe, Gordon V ; Levasseur, Maurice ; Cantin, Guy ; Michaud, Sonia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-9bc6c5c6cc1f9903ec52e57678ba6323ff2e4eef75ec966a5be4b78b4f36ce533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Dimethyl sulfide</topic><topic>Dimethylsulfoniopropionate</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects. Techniques</topic><topic>Marine biology</topic><topic>Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...)</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Phaeocystis pouchetii</topic><topic>Plankton</topic><topic>Protozoa</topic><topic>Selective feeding</topic><topic>Trophic interactions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wolfe, Gordon V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levasseur, Maurice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cantin, Guy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michaud, Sonia</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Deep-sea research. Part I, Oceanographic research papers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wolfe, Gordon V</au><au>Levasseur, Maurice</au><au>Cantin, Guy</au><au>Michaud, Sonia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>DMSP and DMS dynamics and microzooplankton grazing in the Labrador Sea: application of the dilution technique</atitle><jtitle>Deep-sea research. Part I, Oceanographic research papers</jtitle><date>2000-12-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2243</spage><epage>2264</epage><pages>2243-2264</pages><issn>0967-0637</issn><abstract>We adapted the dilution technique to study microzooplankton grazing of algal dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) vs. Chl
a, and to estimate the impact of microzooplankton grazing on dimethyl sulfide (DMS) production in the Labrador Sea. Phytoplankton numbers were dominated by autotrophic nanoflagellates in the Labrador basin, but diatoms and colonial
Phaeocystis pouchetii contributed significantly to phytomass at several high chlorophyll stations and on the Newfoundland and Greenland shelfs. Throughout the region, growth of algal Chl
a and DMSP was generally high (0.2–1
d
−
1), but grazing rates were lower and more variable, characteristic of the early spring bloom period. Production and consumption of Chl
a vs. DMSP followed no clear pattern, and sometimes diverged greatly, likely because of their differing distributions among algal prey taxa and size class. In several experiments where
Phaeocystis was abundant, we observed DMS production proportional to grazing rate, and we found clear evidence of DMS production by this haptophyte following physical stress such as sparging or filtration. It is possible that grazing-activated DMSP cleavage by
Phaeocystis contributes to grazer deterrence: protozoa and copepods apparently avoided healthy colonies (as judged by relative growth and grazing rates of Chl
a and DMSP), and grazing of
Phaeocystis was significant only at one station where cells were in poor condition. Although we hoped to examine selective grazing on or against DMSP-containing algal prey, the dilution technique cannot differentiate selective ingestion and varying digestion rates of Chl
a and DMSP. We also found that the dilution method alone was poorly suited for assessing the impact of grazing on dissolved sulfur pools, because of rapid microbial consumption and the artifactual release of DMSP and DMS during filtration. Measuring and understanding the many processes affecting organosulfur cycling by the microbial food web in natural populations remain a technical challenge that will likely require a combination of techniques to address.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0967-0637(00)00028-5</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0967-0637 |
ispartof | Deep-sea research. Part I, Oceanographic research papers, 2000-12, Vol.47 (12), p.2243-2264 |
issn | 0967-0637 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18501442 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Algae Animal behavior Animal, plant and microbial ecology Biological and medical sciences Dimethyl sulfide Dimethylsulfoniopropionate Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects. Techniques Marine biology Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...) Oceanography Phaeocystis pouchetii Plankton Protozoa Selective feeding Trophic interactions |
title | DMSP and DMS dynamics and microzooplankton grazing in the Labrador Sea: application of the dilution technique |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T22%3A30%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=DMSP%20and%20DMS%20dynamics%20and%20microzooplankton%20grazing%20in%20the%20Labrador%20Sea:%20application%20of%20the%20dilution%20technique&rft.jtitle=Deep-sea%20research.%20Part%20I,%20Oceanographic%20research%20papers&rft.au=Wolfe,%20Gordon%20V&rft.date=2000-12-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2243&rft.epage=2264&rft.pages=2243-2264&rft.issn=0967-0637&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0967-0637(00)00028-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17719368%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-9bc6c5c6cc1f9903ec52e57678ba6323ff2e4eef75ec966a5be4b78b4f36ce533%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=196699492&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |