Reply

Kitanidis [this issue] has provided a useful elaboration of the discussion of geostatistical methods presented by McLaughlin and Townley [1996]. For the most part, we agree with his characterization of the geostatistical approach. However, he seems to have misinterpreted a number of key points in ou...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Water resources research 1997-01, Vol.33 (9), p.2203-2204
Main Authors: McLaughlin, Dennis, Townley, Lloyd R
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Kitanidis [this issue] has provided a useful elaboration of the discussion of geostatistical methods presented by McLaughlin and Townley [1996]. For the most part, we agree with his characterization of the geostatistical approach. However, he seems to have misinterpreted a number of key points in our paper. Our response to the three items listed in Kitanidis' introductory section can be summarized as follows.
ISSN:0043-1397