Visual selective attention in body dysmorphic disorder, bulimia nervosa and healthy controls

• Published in: Journal of psychosomatic research 2017-01, Vol.92, p.26-33
• Main Authors: Kollei, Ines, Horndasch, Stefanie, Erim, Yesim, Martin, Alexandra
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Attention; Attentional bias; Attentional processes; Body dysmorphic disorder; Body Dysmorphic Disorders - physiopathology; Body Dysmorphic Disorders - psychology; Body image; Body Image - psychology; Bulimia; Bulimia nervosa; Bulimia Nervosa - physiopathology; Bulimia Nervosa - psychology; Case-Control Studies; Cognitive ability; Cognitive behavioral therapy; Eye; Eye Movements; Eye tracking; Face; Female; Humans; Male; Photography; Preoccupation; Psychiatry; Questionnaires; Retraining; Selective attention; Self evaluation; Self image; Surveys and Questionnaires; Time course; Tracking; Visual perception
• ISSN: 0022-3999; 1879-1360
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.11.008

Abstract Objective Cognitive behavioral models postulate that selective attention plays an important role in the maintenance of body dysmorphic disorder (BDD). It is suggested that individuals with BDD overfocus on perceived defects in their appearance, which may contribute to the excessive preoccupation with their appearance. Methods The present study used eye tracking to examine visual selective attention in individuals with BDD ( n = 19), as compared to individuals with bulimia nervosa (BN) ( n = 21) and healthy controls (HCs) ( n = 21). Participants completed interviews, questionnaires, rating scales and an eye tracking task: Eye movements were recorded while participants viewed photographs of their own face and attractive as well as unattractive other faces. Results Eye tracking data showed that BDD and BN participants focused less on their self-rated most attractive facial part than HCs. Scanning patterns in own and other faces showed that BDD and BN participants paid as much attention to attractive as to unattractive features in their own face, whereas they focused more on attractive features in attractive other faces. HCs paid more attention to attractive features in their own face and did the same in attractive other faces. Conclusion Results indicate an attentional bias in BDD and BN participants manifesting itself in a neglect of positive features compared to HCs. Perceptual retraining may be an important aspect to focus on in therapy in order to overcome the neglect of positive facial aspects. Future research should aim to disentangle attentional processes in BDD by examining the time course of attentional processing.