Loading…

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic bladder augmentation in the pediatric patient

Abstract Introduction Bladder augmentation is a common surgical intervention for neuropathic bladder dysfunction, and has conventionally been an open procedure. We present a robotic ileocystoplasty to demonstrate the feasibility of an entirely intracorporeal approach in a pediatric patient. Methods...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of pediatric urology 2016-10, Vol.12 (5), p.313.e1-313.e2
Main Authors: Wiestma, A.C, Estrada, C.R, Cho, P.S., M.D, Hollis, M.V, Yu, R.N
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-f6fee031cf85ce8e2a56b6eff06defd1d2a8ddb3c08888d39ba1ef9c2682ad823
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-f6fee031cf85ce8e2a56b6eff06defd1d2a8ddb3c08888d39ba1ef9c2682ad823
container_end_page 313.e2
container_issue 5
container_start_page 313.e1
container_title Journal of pediatric urology
container_volume 12
creator Wiestma, A.C
Estrada, C.R
Cho, P.S., M.D
Hollis, M.V
Yu, R.N
description Abstract Introduction Bladder augmentation is a common surgical intervention for neuropathic bladder dysfunction, and has conventionally been an open procedure. We present a robotic ileocystoplasty to demonstrate the feasibility of an entirely intracorporeal approach in a pediatric patient. Methods The patient was a 6 year old (18.5 kg) boy with a neurogenic bladder secondary to lumbar myelomeningocele. Urodynamics revealed a small capacity and poorly compliant bladder and he was incontinent between frequent catheterizations. A robotic augmentation cystoplasty was performed. Results At one-month postoperatively, a cystogram revealed no urine leak, and the suprapubic tube was removed. The patient resumed CIC every 3 hours during the day and once overnight until postoperative urodynamic studies confirmed safe dynamics, after which the CIC interval was lengthened. Conclusion Robotic bladder augmentation is safe and feasible in a select pediatric population. The entire procedure including preparation of the bowel segment can be completed intracorporeally, even in smaller children.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.06.004
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1852657715</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1477513116301796</els_id><sourcerecordid>1852657715</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-f6fee031cf85ce8e2a56b6eff06defd1d2a8ddb3c08888d39ba1ef9c2682ad823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhkVoyccm_6AEH3vxVh-2JF8KJaRNSKDQJmchS6NUjtdyJDmw_z5adptDLxUDkmbemWGeQegTwWuCCf8yrId5iWFc0_Jb42K4OUKnRApWN7KTH8q7EaJuCSMn6CylAWMmMO2O0QkVXIqWsVN09yv0IXtT65R8ymCrUc86hmTC7E3Vj9paiJVenjYwZZ19mCo_VfkPVDNYr3Msqrn4S_QcfXR6THBxuFfo8fv1w9VNff_zx-3Vt_vaNETk2nEHgBkxTrYGJFDd8p6Dc5hbcJZYqqW1PTNYlmNZ12sCrjOUS6qtpGyFPu_rzjG8LJCy2vhkYBz1BGFJisiW8lYI0hZps5eaMlKK4NQc_UbHrSJY7TCqQe0xqh1GhYvhpqRdHjos_Qbse9JfbkXwdS-AMuerh6iSKQhMQRLBZGWD_1-HfwuY0U_e6PEZtpCGsMSpMFREJaqw-r1b5W6ThDNMRMfZG2p-nMs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1852657715</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Robotic-assisted laparoscopic bladder augmentation in the pediatric patient</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Wiestma, A.C ; Estrada, C.R ; Cho, P.S., M.D ; Hollis, M.V ; Yu, R.N</creator><creatorcontrib>Wiestma, A.C ; Estrada, C.R ; Cho, P.S., M.D ; Hollis, M.V ; Yu, R.N</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Introduction Bladder augmentation is a common surgical intervention for neuropathic bladder dysfunction, and has conventionally been an open procedure. We present a robotic ileocystoplasty to demonstrate the feasibility of an entirely intracorporeal approach in a pediatric patient. Methods The patient was a 6 year old (18.5 kg) boy with a neurogenic bladder secondary to lumbar myelomeningocele. Urodynamics revealed a small capacity and poorly compliant bladder and he was incontinent between frequent catheterizations. A robotic augmentation cystoplasty was performed. Results At one-month postoperatively, a cystogram revealed no urine leak, and the suprapubic tube was removed. The patient resumed CIC every 3 hours during the day and once overnight until postoperative urodynamic studies confirmed safe dynamics, after which the CIC interval was lengthened. Conclusion Robotic bladder augmentation is safe and feasible in a select pediatric population. The entire procedure including preparation of the bowel segment can be completed intracorporeally, even in smaller children.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1477-5131</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4898</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.06.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27687533</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bladder augmentation ; Child ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Male ; Neurogenic bladder ; Pediatrics ; Robotic surgery ; Robotic Surgical Procedures ; Spina bifida ; Urinary Bladder - surgery ; Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic - surgery ; Urologic Surgical Procedures - methods ; Urology</subject><ispartof>Journal of pediatric urology, 2016-10, Vol.12 (5), p.313.e1-313.e2</ispartof><rights>2016</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-f6fee031cf85ce8e2a56b6eff06defd1d2a8ddb3c08888d39ba1ef9c2682ad823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-f6fee031cf85ce8e2a56b6eff06defd1d2a8ddb3c08888d39ba1ef9c2682ad823</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9942-6639</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27687533$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wiestma, A.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estrada, C.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, P.S., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollis, M.V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, R.N</creatorcontrib><title>Robotic-assisted laparoscopic bladder augmentation in the pediatric patient</title><title>Journal of pediatric urology</title><addtitle>J Pediatr Urol</addtitle><description>Abstract Introduction Bladder augmentation is a common surgical intervention for neuropathic bladder dysfunction, and has conventionally been an open procedure. We present a robotic ileocystoplasty to demonstrate the feasibility of an entirely intracorporeal approach in a pediatric patient. Methods The patient was a 6 year old (18.5 kg) boy with a neurogenic bladder secondary to lumbar myelomeningocele. Urodynamics revealed a small capacity and poorly compliant bladder and he was incontinent between frequent catheterizations. A robotic augmentation cystoplasty was performed. Results At one-month postoperatively, a cystogram revealed no urine leak, and the suprapubic tube was removed. The patient resumed CIC every 3 hours during the day and once overnight until postoperative urodynamic studies confirmed safe dynamics, after which the CIC interval was lengthened. Conclusion Robotic bladder augmentation is safe and feasible in a select pediatric population. The entire procedure including preparation of the bowel segment can be completed intracorporeally, even in smaller children.</description><subject>Bladder augmentation</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neurogenic bladder</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Robotic surgery</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Spina bifida</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder - surgery</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic - surgery</subject><subject>Urologic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>1477-5131</issn><issn>1873-4898</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhkVoyccm_6AEH3vxVh-2JF8KJaRNSKDQJmchS6NUjtdyJDmw_z5adptDLxUDkmbemWGeQegTwWuCCf8yrId5iWFc0_Jb42K4OUKnRApWN7KTH8q7EaJuCSMn6CylAWMmMO2O0QkVXIqWsVN09yv0IXtT65R8ymCrUc86hmTC7E3Vj9paiJVenjYwZZ19mCo_VfkPVDNYr3Msqrn4S_QcfXR6THBxuFfo8fv1w9VNff_zx-3Vt_vaNETk2nEHgBkxTrYGJFDd8p6Dc5hbcJZYqqW1PTNYlmNZ12sCrjOUS6qtpGyFPu_rzjG8LJCy2vhkYBz1BGFJisiW8lYI0hZps5eaMlKK4NQc_UbHrSJY7TCqQe0xqh1GhYvhpqRdHjos_Qbse9JfbkXwdS-AMuerh6iSKQhMQRLBZGWD_1-HfwuY0U_e6PEZtpCGsMSpMFREJaqw-r1b5W6ThDNMRMfZG2p-nMs</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Wiestma, A.C</creator><creator>Estrada, C.R</creator><creator>Cho, P.S., M.D</creator><creator>Hollis, M.V</creator><creator>Yu, R.N</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9942-6639</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>Robotic-assisted laparoscopic bladder augmentation in the pediatric patient</title><author>Wiestma, A.C ; Estrada, C.R ; Cho, P.S., M.D ; Hollis, M.V ; Yu, R.N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-f6fee031cf85ce8e2a56b6eff06defd1d2a8ddb3c08888d39ba1ef9c2682ad823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Bladder augmentation</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neurogenic bladder</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Robotic surgery</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Spina bifida</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder - surgery</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic - surgery</topic><topic>Urologic Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wiestma, A.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estrada, C.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, P.S., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollis, M.V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, R.N</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of pediatric urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wiestma, A.C</au><au>Estrada, C.R</au><au>Cho, P.S., M.D</au><au>Hollis, M.V</au><au>Yu, R.N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Robotic-assisted laparoscopic bladder augmentation in the pediatric patient</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pediatric urology</jtitle><addtitle>J Pediatr Urol</addtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>313.e1</spage><epage>313.e2</epage><pages>313.e1-313.e2</pages><issn>1477-5131</issn><eissn>1873-4898</eissn><abstract>Abstract Introduction Bladder augmentation is a common surgical intervention for neuropathic bladder dysfunction, and has conventionally been an open procedure. We present a robotic ileocystoplasty to demonstrate the feasibility of an entirely intracorporeal approach in a pediatric patient. Methods The patient was a 6 year old (18.5 kg) boy with a neurogenic bladder secondary to lumbar myelomeningocele. Urodynamics revealed a small capacity and poorly compliant bladder and he was incontinent between frequent catheterizations. A robotic augmentation cystoplasty was performed. Results At one-month postoperatively, a cystogram revealed no urine leak, and the suprapubic tube was removed. The patient resumed CIC every 3 hours during the day and once overnight until postoperative urodynamic studies confirmed safe dynamics, after which the CIC interval was lengthened. Conclusion Robotic bladder augmentation is safe and feasible in a select pediatric population. The entire procedure including preparation of the bowel segment can be completed intracorporeally, even in smaller children.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>27687533</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.06.004</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9942-6639</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1477-5131
ispartof Journal of pediatric urology, 2016-10, Vol.12 (5), p.313.e1-313.e2
issn 1477-5131
1873-4898
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1852657715
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Bladder augmentation
Child
Humans
Laparoscopy
Male
Neurogenic bladder
Pediatrics
Robotic surgery
Robotic Surgical Procedures
Spina bifida
Urinary Bladder - surgery
Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic - surgery
Urologic Surgical Procedures - methods
Urology
title Robotic-assisted laparoscopic bladder augmentation in the pediatric patient
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A46%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robotic-assisted%20laparoscopic%20bladder%20augmentation%20in%20the%20pediatric%20patient&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pediatric%20urology&rft.au=Wiestma,%20A.C&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=313.e1&rft.epage=313.e2&rft.pages=313.e1-313.e2&rft.issn=1477-5131&rft.eissn=1873-4898&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.06.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1852657715%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-f6fee031cf85ce8e2a56b6eff06defd1d2a8ddb3c08888d39ba1ef9c2682ad823%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1852657715&rft_id=info:pmid/27687533&rfr_iscdi=true