Loading…

Assessment of biogas production in Argentina from co-digestion of sludge and municipal solid waste

•Sewage sludge is co-digested with the organic fraction of municipal solid waste.•Two alternatives of biogas end use were considered: CHP and biomethane generation.•Two digestate end use options (organic fertilizer and incineration) were evaluated.•Environmental, energetic and economic requirements...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Waste management (Elmsford) 2017-03, Vol.61, p.195-205
Main Authors: Morero, Betzabet, Vicentin, Rocio, Campanella, Enrique A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-ebd7233eb03cb1b699b875560089bfcfa615f6bf02408460ae1c194486a2bd7d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-ebd7233eb03cb1b699b875560089bfcfa615f6bf02408460ae1c194486a2bd7d3
container_end_page 205
container_issue
container_start_page 195
container_title Waste management (Elmsford)
container_volume 61
creator Morero, Betzabet
Vicentin, Rocio
Campanella, Enrique A.
description •Sewage sludge is co-digested with the organic fraction of municipal solid waste.•Two alternatives of biogas end use were considered: CHP and biomethane generation.•Two digestate end use options (organic fertilizer and incineration) were evaluated.•Environmental, energetic and economic requirements of bioenergy were analyzed.•Argentina has great potential to exploit organic waste as an energy source. In Argentina, there is an important potential to utilize organic waste to generate bioenergy. This work analyzes the environmental impacts and the energetic and economic requirements of the biogas produced by digesting the sewage sludge (SS) produced in a wastewater treatment plant in a medium city in Argentina. The SS is co-digested with the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW), and the basis of this study is the life cycle assessment (LCA). The LCA is performed according to ISO 14040-44 using the SimaPro simulator. First, the transport of the raw materials to the biogas plant was defined. Then, the co-digestion and the biogas treatment for final use were evaluated. The co-digestion was improved with glycerol, and the generation of biogas was estimated using the GPS-X software. Two alternatives for the end use of biogas were considered: combined heat and power (CHP) and biomethane generation. For the first, H2S and water vapor were removed from the raw biogas stream, and for the second, also CO2 was removed. The H2S removal process was simulated in the SuperPro software by anaerobic biofiltration. The same software was used to simulate the removal of CO2 absorption-desorption with water as solvent. Finally, the environmental impacts related to the end use of biogas (CHP and biomethane) were evaluated. The environmental, energetic and economic analyses showed that the co-digestion of SS and OFMSW has great potential for reducing the environmental impacts and increasing the economic and energetic value of the substances via the production of biomethane, electricity and, potentially, fertilizer.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.11.033
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1852665616</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0956053X16306948</els_id><sourcerecordid>1852665616</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-ebd7233eb03cb1b699b875560089bfcfa615f6bf02408460ae1c194486a2bd7d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpaTZJ_0EIOvZiR2NbsnwpLCFfEMglhdyEPsaLFlvaSnZL_32VbtJjT8Mw7zvzzkPIBbAaGIirff1L51mHuildDVCztv1ANiD7oWo6Lj6SDRu4qBhvX07Iac57xqCTwD6Tk6YfOJey3xCzzRlznjEsNI7U-LjTmR5SdKtdfAzUB7pNuzL2QdMxxZnaWDm_w_x3XDx5Wt0OqQ6Ozmvw1h_0RHOcvKMl4YLn5NOop4xf3uoZ-X5783x9Xz0-3T1cbx8r2wFfKjSub9oWDWutASOGwciec8GYHMxoRy2Aj8KMrOmY7ATTCBaGrpNCN8Xq2jPy9bi3pP-xlnxq9tniNOmAcc0KJG-E4AJEkXZHqU0x54SjOiQ_6_RbAVOvdNVeHemqV7oKQBW6xXb5dmE1M7p_pnecRfDtKMDy50-PSWXrMVh0PqFdlIv-_xf-AETIjm8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1852665616</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of biogas production in Argentina from co-digestion of sludge and municipal solid waste</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Morero, Betzabet ; Vicentin, Rocio ; Campanella, Enrique A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Morero, Betzabet ; Vicentin, Rocio ; Campanella, Enrique A.</creatorcontrib><description>•Sewage sludge is co-digested with the organic fraction of municipal solid waste.•Two alternatives of biogas end use were considered: CHP and biomethane generation.•Two digestate end use options (organic fertilizer and incineration) were evaluated.•Environmental, energetic and economic requirements of bioenergy were analyzed.•Argentina has great potential to exploit organic waste as an energy source. In Argentina, there is an important potential to utilize organic waste to generate bioenergy. This work analyzes the environmental impacts and the energetic and economic requirements of the biogas produced by digesting the sewage sludge (SS) produced in a wastewater treatment plant in a medium city in Argentina. The SS is co-digested with the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW), and the basis of this study is the life cycle assessment (LCA). The LCA is performed according to ISO 14040-44 using the SimaPro simulator. First, the transport of the raw materials to the biogas plant was defined. Then, the co-digestion and the biogas treatment for final use were evaluated. The co-digestion was improved with glycerol, and the generation of biogas was estimated using the GPS-X software. Two alternatives for the end use of biogas were considered: combined heat and power (CHP) and biomethane generation. For the first, H2S and water vapor were removed from the raw biogas stream, and for the second, also CO2 was removed. The H2S removal process was simulated in the SuperPro software by anaerobic biofiltration. The same software was used to simulate the removal of CO2 absorption-desorption with water as solvent. Finally, the environmental impacts related to the end use of biogas (CHP and biomethane) were evaluated. The environmental, energetic and economic analyses showed that the co-digestion of SS and OFMSW has great potential for reducing the environmental impacts and increasing the economic and energetic value of the substances via the production of biomethane, electricity and, potentially, fertilizer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-053X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.11.033</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27955887</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Argentina ; Biofuels ; Biomethane ; CHP ; Co-digestion ; Costs and Cost Analysis ; Digestate management ; Fertilizers ; Incineration ; Methane - biosynthesis ; Refuse Disposal - economics ; Refuse Disposal - methods ; Sewage ; Solid Waste ; Waste Disposal, Fluid - economics ; Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods ; Waste treatment</subject><ispartof>Waste management (Elmsford), 2017-03, Vol.61, p.195-205</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-ebd7233eb03cb1b699b875560089bfcfa615f6bf02408460ae1c194486a2bd7d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-ebd7233eb03cb1b699b875560089bfcfa615f6bf02408460ae1c194486a2bd7d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27955887$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morero, Betzabet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vicentin, Rocio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campanella, Enrique A.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of biogas production in Argentina from co-digestion of sludge and municipal solid waste</title><title>Waste management (Elmsford)</title><addtitle>Waste Manag</addtitle><description>•Sewage sludge is co-digested with the organic fraction of municipal solid waste.•Two alternatives of biogas end use were considered: CHP and biomethane generation.•Two digestate end use options (organic fertilizer and incineration) were evaluated.•Environmental, energetic and economic requirements of bioenergy were analyzed.•Argentina has great potential to exploit organic waste as an energy source. In Argentina, there is an important potential to utilize organic waste to generate bioenergy. This work analyzes the environmental impacts and the energetic and economic requirements of the biogas produced by digesting the sewage sludge (SS) produced in a wastewater treatment plant in a medium city in Argentina. The SS is co-digested with the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW), and the basis of this study is the life cycle assessment (LCA). The LCA is performed according to ISO 14040-44 using the SimaPro simulator. First, the transport of the raw materials to the biogas plant was defined. Then, the co-digestion and the biogas treatment for final use were evaluated. The co-digestion was improved with glycerol, and the generation of biogas was estimated using the GPS-X software. Two alternatives for the end use of biogas were considered: combined heat and power (CHP) and biomethane generation. For the first, H2S and water vapor were removed from the raw biogas stream, and for the second, also CO2 was removed. The H2S removal process was simulated in the SuperPro software by anaerobic biofiltration. The same software was used to simulate the removal of CO2 absorption-desorption with water as solvent. Finally, the environmental impacts related to the end use of biogas (CHP and biomethane) were evaluated. The environmental, energetic and economic analyses showed that the co-digestion of SS and OFMSW has great potential for reducing the environmental impacts and increasing the economic and energetic value of the substances via the production of biomethane, electricity and, potentially, fertilizer.</description><subject>Argentina</subject><subject>Biofuels</subject><subject>Biomethane</subject><subject>CHP</subject><subject>Co-digestion</subject><subject>Costs and Cost Analysis</subject><subject>Digestate management</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Incineration</subject><subject>Methane - biosynthesis</subject><subject>Refuse Disposal - economics</subject><subject>Refuse Disposal - methods</subject><subject>Sewage</subject><subject>Solid Waste</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid - economics</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</subject><subject>Waste treatment</subject><issn>0956-053X</issn><issn>1879-2456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpaTZJ_0EIOvZiR2NbsnwpLCFfEMglhdyEPsaLFlvaSnZL_32VbtJjT8Mw7zvzzkPIBbAaGIirff1L51mHuildDVCztv1ANiD7oWo6Lj6SDRu4qBhvX07Iac57xqCTwD6Tk6YfOJey3xCzzRlznjEsNI7U-LjTmR5SdKtdfAzUB7pNuzL2QdMxxZnaWDm_w_x3XDx5Wt0OqQ6Ozmvw1h_0RHOcvKMl4YLn5NOop4xf3uoZ-X5783x9Xz0-3T1cbx8r2wFfKjSub9oWDWutASOGwciec8GYHMxoRy2Aj8KMrOmY7ATTCBaGrpNCN8Xq2jPy9bi3pP-xlnxq9tniNOmAcc0KJG-E4AJEkXZHqU0x54SjOiQ_6_RbAVOvdNVeHemqV7oKQBW6xXb5dmE1M7p_pnecRfDtKMDy50-PSWXrMVh0PqFdlIv-_xf-AETIjm8</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Morero, Betzabet</creator><creator>Vicentin, Rocio</creator><creator>Campanella, Enrique A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>Assessment of biogas production in Argentina from co-digestion of sludge and municipal solid waste</title><author>Morero, Betzabet ; Vicentin, Rocio ; Campanella, Enrique A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-ebd7233eb03cb1b699b875560089bfcfa615f6bf02408460ae1c194486a2bd7d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Argentina</topic><topic>Biofuels</topic><topic>Biomethane</topic><topic>CHP</topic><topic>Co-digestion</topic><topic>Costs and Cost Analysis</topic><topic>Digestate management</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Incineration</topic><topic>Methane - biosynthesis</topic><topic>Refuse Disposal - economics</topic><topic>Refuse Disposal - methods</topic><topic>Sewage</topic><topic>Solid Waste</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid - economics</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</topic><topic>Waste treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morero, Betzabet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vicentin, Rocio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campanella, Enrique A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Waste management (Elmsford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morero, Betzabet</au><au>Vicentin, Rocio</au><au>Campanella, Enrique A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of biogas production in Argentina from co-digestion of sludge and municipal solid waste</atitle><jtitle>Waste management (Elmsford)</jtitle><addtitle>Waste Manag</addtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>61</volume><spage>195</spage><epage>205</epage><pages>195-205</pages><issn>0956-053X</issn><eissn>1879-2456</eissn><abstract>•Sewage sludge is co-digested with the organic fraction of municipal solid waste.•Two alternatives of biogas end use were considered: CHP and biomethane generation.•Two digestate end use options (organic fertilizer and incineration) were evaluated.•Environmental, energetic and economic requirements of bioenergy were analyzed.•Argentina has great potential to exploit organic waste as an energy source. In Argentina, there is an important potential to utilize organic waste to generate bioenergy. This work analyzes the environmental impacts and the energetic and economic requirements of the biogas produced by digesting the sewage sludge (SS) produced in a wastewater treatment plant in a medium city in Argentina. The SS is co-digested with the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW), and the basis of this study is the life cycle assessment (LCA). The LCA is performed according to ISO 14040-44 using the SimaPro simulator. First, the transport of the raw materials to the biogas plant was defined. Then, the co-digestion and the biogas treatment for final use were evaluated. The co-digestion was improved with glycerol, and the generation of biogas was estimated using the GPS-X software. Two alternatives for the end use of biogas were considered: combined heat and power (CHP) and biomethane generation. For the first, H2S and water vapor were removed from the raw biogas stream, and for the second, also CO2 was removed. The H2S removal process was simulated in the SuperPro software by anaerobic biofiltration. The same software was used to simulate the removal of CO2 absorption-desorption with water as solvent. Finally, the environmental impacts related to the end use of biogas (CHP and biomethane) were evaluated. The environmental, energetic and economic analyses showed that the co-digestion of SS and OFMSW has great potential for reducing the environmental impacts and increasing the economic and energetic value of the substances via the production of biomethane, electricity and, potentially, fertilizer.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>27955887</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.wasman.2016.11.033</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0956-053X
ispartof Waste management (Elmsford), 2017-03, Vol.61, p.195-205
issn 0956-053X
1879-2456
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1852665616
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Argentina
Biofuels
Biomethane
CHP
Co-digestion
Costs and Cost Analysis
Digestate management
Fertilizers
Incineration
Methane - biosynthesis
Refuse Disposal - economics
Refuse Disposal - methods
Sewage
Solid Waste
Waste Disposal, Fluid - economics
Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods
Waste treatment
title Assessment of biogas production in Argentina from co-digestion of sludge and municipal solid waste
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T14%3A46%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20biogas%20production%20in%20Argentina%20from%20co-digestion%20of%20sludge%20and%20municipal%20solid%20waste&rft.jtitle=Waste%20management%20(Elmsford)&rft.au=Morero,%20Betzabet&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=61&rft.spage=195&rft.epage=205&rft.pages=195-205&rft.issn=0956-053X&rft.eissn=1879-2456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.11.033&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1852665616%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-ebd7233eb03cb1b699b875560089bfcfa615f6bf02408460ae1c194486a2bd7d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1852665616&rft_id=info:pmid/27955887&rfr_iscdi=true