Loading…
Hospital Magnet® Designation and Missed Nursing Care in Neonatal Intensive Care Units
Missed nursing care is an emerging measure of front-line nursing care effectiveness in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Given Magnet® hospitals' reputations for nursing care quality, missed care comparisons with non-Magnet® hospitals may yield insights about how Magnet® designation influe...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of pediatric nursing 2017-05, Vol.34, p.5-9 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-8699e3905a9571bd926dd775329705db4b3008f1b51d6dfd2e95237ec3789a863 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-8699e3905a9571bd926dd775329705db4b3008f1b51d6dfd2e95237ec3789a863 |
container_end_page | 9 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 5 |
container_title | Journal of pediatric nursing |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Tubbs-Cooley, Heather L. Pickler, Rita H. Mara, Constance A. Othman, Mohammad Kovacs, Allison Mark, Barbara A. |
description | Missed nursing care is an emerging measure of front-line nursing care effectiveness in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Given Magnet® hospitals' reputations for nursing care quality, missed care comparisons with non-Magnet® hospitals may yield insights about how Magnet® designation influences patient outcomes. The purpose of this secondary analysis was to evaluate the relationship between hospital Magnet® designation and 1) the occurrence of nurse-reported missed care and 2) reasons for missed nursing care between NICU nurses employed in Magnet® and non-Magnet® hospitals. A random sample of certified neonatal intensive care unit nurses was invited to participate in a cross-sectional survey in 2012; data were analyzed from nurses who provided direct patient care (n=230). Logistic regression was used to model relationships between Magnet® designation and reports of the occurrence of and reasons for missed care while controlling for nurse and shift characteristics. There was no relationship between Magnet® designation and missed care occurrence for 34 of 35 types of care. Nurses in Magnet® hospitals were significantly less likely to report tensions and communication breakdowns with other staff, lack of familiarity with policies/procedures, and lack of back-up support from team members as reasons for missed care. Missed nursing care in NICUs occurs regardless of hospital Magnet® recognition. However, nurses' reasons for missed care systematically differ in Magnet® and non-Magnet® hospitals and these differences merit further exploration.
•Magnet® designation reflects a hospital’s investment in high nursing care quality.•Missed nursing care is an emerging measure of nursing quality. We expected that NICU nurses in Magnet® hospitals would report less missed care.•Missed nursing care in NICUs occurs regardless of hospital Magnet® designation.•Nurses’ reasons for missed care differ in Magnet® and non-Magnet® NICUs possibly due to practice environment differences. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.pedn.2016.12.004 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1852665672</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0882596316302457</els_id><sourcerecordid>1852665672</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-8699e3905a9571bd926dd775329705db4b3008f1b51d6dfd2e95237ec3789a863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OAjEURhujEURfwIWZpZsZ2860nSZuDP5AArgRt01neoeUQAfbgcSX8iF8MktAl656k57vy70HoWuCM4IJv1tmGzAuo3HOCM0wLk5Qn7CcpmVRyFPUx2VJUyZ53kMXISwxJoQJeY56VEjGJBN99D5qw8Z2epVM9cJB9_2VPEKwC6c727pEO5NMbQhgktnWB-sWyVB7SKxLZtBGKAbHrgMX7A4OX3Nnu3CJzhq9CnB1fAdo_vz0Nhylk9eX8fBhktY5411acikhl5jpuAypjKTcGCHiCVJgZqqiyjEuG1IxYrhpDAXJaC6gzkUpdcnzAbo99G58-7GF0Km1DTWsVtpBuw2KlIxyzrigEaUHtPZtCB4atfF2rf2nIljtfaql2vtUe5-KUBV9xtDNsX9brcH8RX4FRuD-AEC8cmfBq1BbcDUY66HulGntf_0_tZmGPQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1852665672</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hospital Magnet® Designation and Missed Nursing Care in Neonatal Intensive Care Units</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Tubbs-Cooley, Heather L. ; Pickler, Rita H. ; Mara, Constance A. ; Othman, Mohammad ; Kovacs, Allison ; Mark, Barbara A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tubbs-Cooley, Heather L. ; Pickler, Rita H. ; Mara, Constance A. ; Othman, Mohammad ; Kovacs, Allison ; Mark, Barbara A.</creatorcontrib><description>Missed nursing care is an emerging measure of front-line nursing care effectiveness in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Given Magnet® hospitals' reputations for nursing care quality, missed care comparisons with non-Magnet® hospitals may yield insights about how Magnet® designation influences patient outcomes. The purpose of this secondary analysis was to evaluate the relationship between hospital Magnet® designation and 1) the occurrence of nurse-reported missed care and 2) reasons for missed nursing care between NICU nurses employed in Magnet® and non-Magnet® hospitals. A random sample of certified neonatal intensive care unit nurses was invited to participate in a cross-sectional survey in 2012; data were analyzed from nurses who provided direct patient care (n=230). Logistic regression was used to model relationships between Magnet® designation and reports of the occurrence of and reasons for missed care while controlling for nurse and shift characteristics. There was no relationship between Magnet® designation and missed care occurrence for 34 of 35 types of care. Nurses in Magnet® hospitals were significantly less likely to report tensions and communication breakdowns with other staff, lack of familiarity with policies/procedures, and lack of back-up support from team members as reasons for missed care. Missed nursing care in NICUs occurs regardless of hospital Magnet® recognition. However, nurses' reasons for missed care systematically differ in Magnet® and non-Magnet® hospitals and these differences merit further exploration.
•Magnet® designation reflects a hospital’s investment in high nursing care quality.•Missed nursing care is an emerging measure of nursing quality. We expected that NICU nurses in Magnet® hospitals would report less missed care.•Missed nursing care in NICUs occurs regardless of hospital Magnet® designation.•Nurses’ reasons for missed care differ in Magnet® and non-Magnet® NICUs possibly due to practice environment differences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0882-5963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8449</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.pedn.2016.12.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27955957</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Hospitals, Pediatric - standards ; Hospitals, Pediatric - trends ; Hospitals, Special ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units, Neonatal - standards ; Intensive Care Units, Neonatal - trends ; Intensive Care, Neonatal - standards ; Intensive Care, Neonatal - trends ; Logistic Models ; Magnet® hospital ; Male ; Medical Errors - statistics & numerical data ; Middle Aged ; Missed care ; Neonatal Nursing - standards ; Neonatal Nursing - trends ; NICU ; Nursing ; Patient Safety - statistics & numerical data ; Quality ; Quality of Health Care ; Risk Assessment ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of pediatric nursing, 2017-05, Vol.34, p.5-9</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-8699e3905a9571bd926dd775329705db4b3008f1b51d6dfd2e95237ec3789a863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-8699e3905a9571bd926dd775329705db4b3008f1b51d6dfd2e95237ec3789a863</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8564-7118</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27955957$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tubbs-Cooley, Heather L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pickler, Rita H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mara, Constance A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Othman, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovacs, Allison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mark, Barbara A.</creatorcontrib><title>Hospital Magnet® Designation and Missed Nursing Care in Neonatal Intensive Care Units</title><title>Journal of pediatric nursing</title><addtitle>J Pediatr Nurs</addtitle><description>Missed nursing care is an emerging measure of front-line nursing care effectiveness in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Given Magnet® hospitals' reputations for nursing care quality, missed care comparisons with non-Magnet® hospitals may yield insights about how Magnet® designation influences patient outcomes. The purpose of this secondary analysis was to evaluate the relationship between hospital Magnet® designation and 1) the occurrence of nurse-reported missed care and 2) reasons for missed nursing care between NICU nurses employed in Magnet® and non-Magnet® hospitals. A random sample of certified neonatal intensive care unit nurses was invited to participate in a cross-sectional survey in 2012; data were analyzed from nurses who provided direct patient care (n=230). Logistic regression was used to model relationships between Magnet® designation and reports of the occurrence of and reasons for missed care while controlling for nurse and shift characteristics. There was no relationship between Magnet® designation and missed care occurrence for 34 of 35 types of care. Nurses in Magnet® hospitals were significantly less likely to report tensions and communication breakdowns with other staff, lack of familiarity with policies/procedures, and lack of back-up support from team members as reasons for missed care. Missed nursing care in NICUs occurs regardless of hospital Magnet® recognition. However, nurses' reasons for missed care systematically differ in Magnet® and non-Magnet® hospitals and these differences merit further exploration.
•Magnet® designation reflects a hospital’s investment in high nursing care quality.•Missed nursing care is an emerging measure of nursing quality. We expected that NICU nurses in Magnet® hospitals would report less missed care.•Missed nursing care in NICUs occurs regardless of hospital Magnet® designation.•Nurses’ reasons for missed care differ in Magnet® and non-Magnet® NICUs possibly due to practice environment differences.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitals, Pediatric - standards</subject><subject>Hospitals, Pediatric - trends</subject><subject>Hospitals, Special</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units, Neonatal - standards</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units, Neonatal - trends</subject><subject>Intensive Care, Neonatal - standards</subject><subject>Intensive Care, Neonatal - trends</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Magnet® hospital</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Errors - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Missed care</subject><subject>Neonatal Nursing - standards</subject><subject>Neonatal Nursing - trends</subject><subject>NICU</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Patient Safety - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0882-5963</issn><issn>1532-8449</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1OAjEURhujEURfwIWZpZsZ2860nSZuDP5AArgRt01neoeUQAfbgcSX8iF8MktAl656k57vy70HoWuCM4IJv1tmGzAuo3HOCM0wLk5Qn7CcpmVRyFPUx2VJUyZ53kMXISwxJoQJeY56VEjGJBN99D5qw8Z2epVM9cJB9_2VPEKwC6c727pEO5NMbQhgktnWB-sWyVB7SKxLZtBGKAbHrgMX7A4OX3Nnu3CJzhq9CnB1fAdo_vz0Nhylk9eX8fBhktY5411acikhl5jpuAypjKTcGCHiCVJgZqqiyjEuG1IxYrhpDAXJaC6gzkUpdcnzAbo99G58-7GF0Km1DTWsVtpBuw2KlIxyzrigEaUHtPZtCB4atfF2rf2nIljtfaql2vtUe5-KUBV9xtDNsX9brcH8RX4FRuD-AEC8cmfBq1BbcDUY66HulGntf_0_tZmGPQ</recordid><startdate>201705</startdate><enddate>201705</enddate><creator>Tubbs-Cooley, Heather L.</creator><creator>Pickler, Rita H.</creator><creator>Mara, Constance A.</creator><creator>Othman, Mohammad</creator><creator>Kovacs, Allison</creator><creator>Mark, Barbara A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8564-7118</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201705</creationdate><title>Hospital Magnet® Designation and Missed Nursing Care in Neonatal Intensive Care Units</title><author>Tubbs-Cooley, Heather L. ; Pickler, Rita H. ; Mara, Constance A. ; Othman, Mohammad ; Kovacs, Allison ; Mark, Barbara A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-8699e3905a9571bd926dd775329705db4b3008f1b51d6dfd2e95237ec3789a863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitals, Pediatric - standards</topic><topic>Hospitals, Pediatric - trends</topic><topic>Hospitals, Special</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units, Neonatal - standards</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units, Neonatal - trends</topic><topic>Intensive Care, Neonatal - standards</topic><topic>Intensive Care, Neonatal - trends</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Magnet® hospital</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Errors - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Missed care</topic><topic>Neonatal Nursing - standards</topic><topic>Neonatal Nursing - trends</topic><topic>NICU</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Patient Safety - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tubbs-Cooley, Heather L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pickler, Rita H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mara, Constance A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Othman, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovacs, Allison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mark, Barbara A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of pediatric nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tubbs-Cooley, Heather L.</au><au>Pickler, Rita H.</au><au>Mara, Constance A.</au><au>Othman, Mohammad</au><au>Kovacs, Allison</au><au>Mark, Barbara A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hospital Magnet® Designation and Missed Nursing Care in Neonatal Intensive Care Units</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pediatric nursing</jtitle><addtitle>J Pediatr Nurs</addtitle><date>2017-05</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>34</volume><spage>5</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>5-9</pages><issn>0882-5963</issn><eissn>1532-8449</eissn><abstract>Missed nursing care is an emerging measure of front-line nursing care effectiveness in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Given Magnet® hospitals' reputations for nursing care quality, missed care comparisons with non-Magnet® hospitals may yield insights about how Magnet® designation influences patient outcomes. The purpose of this secondary analysis was to evaluate the relationship between hospital Magnet® designation and 1) the occurrence of nurse-reported missed care and 2) reasons for missed nursing care between NICU nurses employed in Magnet® and non-Magnet® hospitals. A random sample of certified neonatal intensive care unit nurses was invited to participate in a cross-sectional survey in 2012; data were analyzed from nurses who provided direct patient care (n=230). Logistic regression was used to model relationships between Magnet® designation and reports of the occurrence of and reasons for missed care while controlling for nurse and shift characteristics. There was no relationship between Magnet® designation and missed care occurrence for 34 of 35 types of care. Nurses in Magnet® hospitals were significantly less likely to report tensions and communication breakdowns with other staff, lack of familiarity with policies/procedures, and lack of back-up support from team members as reasons for missed care. Missed nursing care in NICUs occurs regardless of hospital Magnet® recognition. However, nurses' reasons for missed care systematically differ in Magnet® and non-Magnet® hospitals and these differences merit further exploration.
•Magnet® designation reflects a hospital’s investment in high nursing care quality.•Missed nursing care is an emerging measure of nursing quality. We expected that NICU nurses in Magnet® hospitals would report less missed care.•Missed nursing care in NICUs occurs regardless of hospital Magnet® designation.•Nurses’ reasons for missed care differ in Magnet® and non-Magnet® NICUs possibly due to practice environment differences.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27955957</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.pedn.2016.12.004</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8564-7118</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0882-5963 |
ispartof | Journal of pediatric nursing, 2017-05, Vol.34, p.5-9 |
issn | 0882-5963 1532-8449 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1852665672 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Cross-Sectional Studies Female Hospitals, Pediatric - standards Hospitals, Pediatric - trends Hospitals, Special Humans Intensive Care Units, Neonatal - standards Intensive Care Units, Neonatal - trends Intensive Care, Neonatal - standards Intensive Care, Neonatal - trends Logistic Models Magnet® hospital Male Medical Errors - statistics & numerical data Middle Aged Missed care Neonatal Nursing - standards Neonatal Nursing - trends NICU Nursing Patient Safety - statistics & numerical data Quality Quality of Health Care Risk Assessment United States |
title | Hospital Magnet® Designation and Missed Nursing Care in Neonatal Intensive Care Units |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T05%3A40%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hospital%20Magnet%C2%AE%20Designation%20and%20Missed%20Nursing%20Care%20in%20Neonatal%20Intensive%20Care%20Units&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pediatric%20nursing&rft.au=Tubbs-Cooley,%20Heather%20L.&rft.date=2017-05&rft.volume=34&rft.spage=5&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=5-9&rft.issn=0882-5963&rft.eissn=1532-8449&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.pedn.2016.12.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1852665672%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-8699e3905a9571bd926dd775329705db4b3008f1b51d6dfd2e95237ec3789a863%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1852665672&rft_id=info:pmid/27955957&rfr_iscdi=true |