Loading…
Left ventricular function in response to dipyridamole stress: head-to-head comparison between 82Rubidium PET and 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT ECG-gated myocardial perfusion imaging
Purpose Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with 99m Tc-sestamibi (sestamibi) SPECT and rubidium-82 ( 82 Rb) PET both allow for combined assessment of perfusion and left ventricular (LV) function. We sought to compare parameters of LV function obtained with both methods using a single dipyridamole st...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging 2017-05, Vol.44 (5), p.876-885 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Purpose
Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with
99m
Tc-sestamibi (sestamibi) SPECT and rubidium-82 (
82
Rb) PET both allow for combined assessment of perfusion and left ventricular (LV) function. We sought to compare parameters of LV function obtained with both methods using a single dipyridamole stress dose.
Materials and methods
A group of 221 consecutive patients (65.2 ± 10.4 years, 52.9% male) underwent consecutive sestamibi and
82
Rb MPI after a single dipyridamole stress dose. Sestamibi and
82
Rb summed rest (SRS), stress (SSS) and difference (SDS) scores, and LV end-diastolic (EDV) and end-systolic (ESV) volumes and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were compared.
Results
Bland-Altman analysis showed that with increasing ESV and EDV the difference between the two perfusion tracers increased both at rest and post-stress. The mean difference in EDV and ESV between the two perfusion tracers at rest could both be independently explained by the
82
Rb SDS and the sestamibi SRS. The combined models explained approximately 30% of the variation in these volumes between the two perfusion tracers (R
2
= 0.261,
p
= 0.005; R
2
= 0.296,
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1619-7070 1619-7089 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00259-016-3588-x |