The early processing of metaphors and similes: Evidence from eye movements

This eye movement study examined how people read nominal metaphors and similes in order to investigate how the surface form, or wording, of these expressions affected early processing. Participants silently read metaphors (knowledge is a river) and similes (knowledge is like a river). The identical...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) 2018-01, Vol.71 (1), p.161-168
Main Authors: Ashby, Jane, Roncero, Carlos, de Almeida, Roberto G, Agauas, Stephen J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Experiments
Eye movements
Metaphor
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This eye movement study examined how people read nominal metaphors and similes in order to investigate how the surface form, or wording, of these expressions affected early processing. Participants silently read metaphors (knowledge is a river) and similes (knowledge is like a river). The identical words were used in the topic–vehicle pair (knowledge–river) in both conditions. Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrated longer reading times and a higher proportion of regressions in metaphors than in similes. Familiarity modulated later metaphor effects in Experiment 1, but not in Experiment 2. Reading ability did not modulate the metaphor effects in Experiment 2. Results indicate that readers revised their initial interpretation of metaphors before moving on to read new text. This suggests that readers did not initially hold figurative interpretations of apt nominal metaphors that are somewhat familiar. Metaphor interpretation may be fast, but it is not easy.
ISSN:1747-0218
1747-0226
DOI:10.1080/17470218.2016.1278456