Contrasting phenotypic plasticity in the photoprotective strategies of the invasive species Carpobrotus edulis and the coexisting native species Crithmum maritimum

• Published in: Physiologia plantarum 2017-06, Vol.160 (2), p.185-200
• Main Authors: Fenollosa, Erola, Munné‐Bosch, Sergi, Pintó‐Marijuan, Marta
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aizoaceae - physiology; Apiaceae - physiology; Carotene; Ecosystem; Environmental monitoring; Environmental stress; Experimental design; Herbivores; Indigenous species; Introduced species; Invasive plants; Invasive species; Native species; Nonnative species; Phenotypic plasticity; Photosynthesis - physiology; Plasticity; Plasticity index; Stress, Physiological; Success; Summer; Vigor; Xanthophylls
• ISSN: 0031-9317; 1399-3054
• DOI: 10.1111/ppl.12542

Photoprotective strategies vary greatly within the plant kingdom and reflect a plant's physiological status and capacity to cope with environment variations. The plasticity and intensity of these responses may determine plant success. Invasive species are reported to show increased vigor to displace native species. Describing the mechanisms that confer such vigor is essential to understanding the success of invasive species. We performed an experiment whereby two species were monitored: Carpobrotus edulis, an aggressive invasive species in the Mediterranean basin, and Crithmum maritimum, a coexisting native species in the Cap de Creus Natural Park (NE Spain). We analyzed their photoprotective responses to seasonal environmental dynamics by comparing the capacity of the invader to respond to the local environmental stresses throughout the year. Our study analyses ecophysiological markers and photoprotective strategies to gain an insight into the success of invaders. We found that both species showed completely different but effective photoprotective strategies: in summer, C. edulis took special advantage of the xanthophyll cycle, whereas the success of C. maritimum in summer stemmed from morphological changes and alterations on β‐carotene content. Winter also presented differences between the species, as the native showed reduced Fv/Fm ratios. Our experimental design allowed us to introduce a new approach to compare phenotypic plasticity: the integrated phenotypic plasticity index (PPint), defined as the maximum Euclidian distance between phenotypes, using a combination of different variables to describe them. This index revealed significantly greater phenotypic plasticity in the invasive species compared to the native species.