Loading…
On the Surface Free Energy of PVC/EVA Polymer Blends: Comparison of Different Calculation Methods
The surface free energy of polymeric films of polyvinylchloride (PVC) + poly(ethylene-co-vinylacetate) (EVA) blends was calculated using the van Oss treatment (Lifshitz and electron donor–electron acceptor components of surface free energy) and the Owens–Wendt treatment (dispersive and nondispersive...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of colloid and interface science 1998-12, Vol.208 (1), p.319-328 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-9dd78a10bc13eb779f231ca4e00f6eb616a276a496adf12f36653df0d9b1cb1d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-9dd78a10bc13eb779f231ca4e00f6eb616a276a496adf12f36653df0d9b1cb1d3 |
container_end_page | 328 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 319 |
container_title | Journal of colloid and interface science |
container_volume | 208 |
creator | Michalski, Marie-Caroline Hardy, Joël Saramago, Benilde J.V. |
description | The surface free energy of polymeric films of polyvinylchloride (PVC) + poly(ethylene-co-vinylacetate) (EVA) blends was calculated using the van Oss treatment (Lifshitz and electron donor–electron acceptor components of surface free energy) and the Owens–Wendt treatment (dispersive and nondispersive components of surface free energy). Surface free energy results were found to be greatly dependent on the calculation method and on the number of standard liquids used for contact angle measurements. The nondispersive/donor–acceptor surface free energy component and the total surface free energy of polymeric films were always higher when the van Oss treatment was used compared to the Owens–Wendt treatment. Conversely, both methods led to similar apolar/Lifshitz components. All the calculation methods were in good agreement for the surface free energy of PVC; however, a discrepancy between the methods arose as EVA content in the blends increased. It seems that there is not yet a definite solution for the calculation of solid surface free energy. Further developments of existing models are needed in order to gain consistency when calculating this important physicochemical quantity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1006/jcis.1998.5814 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859215158</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0021979798958143</els_id><sourcerecordid>1859215158</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-9dd78a10bc13eb779f231ca4e00f6eb616a276a496adf12f36653df0d9b1cb1d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL1v1DAYhy1EVY7SlQ3JAwNLrn6Tiz_YSriWSkWtBO1qOfZr6iqJDztBuv-eRHfq1snD73kfWQ8hH4GtgTF-8WxDXoNScl1L2LwhK2CqLgSw6i1ZMVZCoYQS78j7nJ8ZA6hrdUpOlSyZkGxFzN1Axyekv6bkjUV6lRDpdsD0Z0-jp_ePzcX28ZLex27fY6LfOhxc_kqb2O9MCjkOC_U9eI8Jh5E2prNTZ8YwDz9xfIoufyAn3nQZz4_vGXm42v5ufhS3d9c3zeVtYTcVHwvlnJAGWGuhwlYI5csKrNkgY55jy4GbUnCzUdw4D6WvOK8r55lTLdgWXHVGvhy8uxT_TphH3YdssevMgHHKGmStSqihljO6PqA2xZwTer1LoTdpr4Hppapequqlql6qzgefju6p7dG94MeM8_75uJtsTeeTGRbBi5VLKXg5Y_KA4dzhX8Cksw04WHQhoR21i-G1H_wHX22SZg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1859215158</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the Surface Free Energy of PVC/EVA Polymer Blends: Comparison of Different Calculation Methods</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Michalski, Marie-Caroline ; Hardy, Joël ; Saramago, Benilde J.V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Michalski, Marie-Caroline ; Hardy, Joël ; Saramago, Benilde J.V.</creatorcontrib><description>The surface free energy of polymeric films of polyvinylchloride (PVC) + poly(ethylene-co-vinylacetate) (EVA) blends was calculated using the van Oss treatment (Lifshitz and electron donor–electron acceptor components of surface free energy) and the Owens–Wendt treatment (dispersive and nondispersive components of surface free energy). Surface free energy results were found to be greatly dependent on the calculation method and on the number of standard liquids used for contact angle measurements. The nondispersive/donor–acceptor surface free energy component and the total surface free energy of polymeric films were always higher when the van Oss treatment was used compared to the Owens–Wendt treatment. Conversely, both methods led to similar apolar/Lifshitz components. All the calculation methods were in good agreement for the surface free energy of PVC; however, a discrepancy between the methods arose as EVA content in the blends increased. It seems that there is not yet a definite solution for the calculation of solid surface free energy. Further developments of existing models are needed in order to gain consistency when calculating this important physicochemical quantity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-7103</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/jcis.1998.5814</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9820780</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCISA5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego, CA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>acid–base interactions ; Applied sciences ; contact angle ; EVA ; Exact sciences and technology ; Organic polymers ; Physicochemistry of polymers ; polymer blends ; Properties and characterization ; PVC ; surface free energy ; surface free energy components ; Surface properties</subject><ispartof>Journal of colloid and interface science, 1998-12, Vol.208 (1), p.319-328</ispartof><rights>1998 Academic Press</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-9dd78a10bc13eb779f231ca4e00f6eb616a276a496adf12f36653df0d9b1cb1d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-9dd78a10bc13eb779f231ca4e00f6eb616a276a496adf12f36653df0d9b1cb1d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1688762$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9820780$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Michalski, Marie-Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardy, Joël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saramago, Benilde J.V.</creatorcontrib><title>On the Surface Free Energy of PVC/EVA Polymer Blends: Comparison of Different Calculation Methods</title><title>Journal of colloid and interface science</title><addtitle>J Colloid Interface Sci</addtitle><description>The surface free energy of polymeric films of polyvinylchloride (PVC) + poly(ethylene-co-vinylacetate) (EVA) blends was calculated using the van Oss treatment (Lifshitz and electron donor–electron acceptor components of surface free energy) and the Owens–Wendt treatment (dispersive and nondispersive components of surface free energy). Surface free energy results were found to be greatly dependent on the calculation method and on the number of standard liquids used for contact angle measurements. The nondispersive/donor–acceptor surface free energy component and the total surface free energy of polymeric films were always higher when the van Oss treatment was used compared to the Owens–Wendt treatment. Conversely, both methods led to similar apolar/Lifshitz components. All the calculation methods were in good agreement for the surface free energy of PVC; however, a discrepancy between the methods arose as EVA content in the blends increased. It seems that there is not yet a definite solution for the calculation of solid surface free energy. Further developments of existing models are needed in order to gain consistency when calculating this important physicochemical quantity.</description><subject>acid–base interactions</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>contact angle</subject><subject>EVA</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Organic polymers</subject><subject>Physicochemistry of polymers</subject><subject>polymer blends</subject><subject>Properties and characterization</subject><subject>PVC</subject><subject>surface free energy</subject><subject>surface free energy components</subject><subject>Surface properties</subject><issn>0021-9797</issn><issn>1095-7103</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kL1v1DAYhy1EVY7SlQ3JAwNLrn6Tiz_YSriWSkWtBO1qOfZr6iqJDztBuv-eRHfq1snD73kfWQ8hH4GtgTF-8WxDXoNScl1L2LwhK2CqLgSw6i1ZMVZCoYQS78j7nJ8ZA6hrdUpOlSyZkGxFzN1Axyekv6bkjUV6lRDpdsD0Z0-jp_ePzcX28ZLex27fY6LfOhxc_kqb2O9MCjkOC_U9eI8Jh5E2prNTZ8YwDz9xfIoufyAn3nQZz4_vGXm42v5ufhS3d9c3zeVtYTcVHwvlnJAGWGuhwlYI5csKrNkgY55jy4GbUnCzUdw4D6WvOK8r55lTLdgWXHVGvhy8uxT_TphH3YdssevMgHHKGmStSqihljO6PqA2xZwTer1LoTdpr4Hppapequqlql6qzgefju6p7dG94MeM8_75uJtsTeeTGRbBi5VLKXg5Y_KA4dzhX8Cksw04WHQhoR21i-G1H_wHX22SZg</recordid><startdate>19981201</startdate><enddate>19981201</enddate><creator>Michalski, Marie-Caroline</creator><creator>Hardy, Joël</creator><creator>Saramago, Benilde J.V.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19981201</creationdate><title>On the Surface Free Energy of PVC/EVA Polymer Blends: Comparison of Different Calculation Methods</title><author>Michalski, Marie-Caroline ; Hardy, Joël ; Saramago, Benilde J.V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-9dd78a10bc13eb779f231ca4e00f6eb616a276a496adf12f36653df0d9b1cb1d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>acid–base interactions</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>contact angle</topic><topic>EVA</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Organic polymers</topic><topic>Physicochemistry of polymers</topic><topic>polymer blends</topic><topic>Properties and characterization</topic><topic>PVC</topic><topic>surface free energy</topic><topic>surface free energy components</topic><topic>Surface properties</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Michalski, Marie-Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardy, Joël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saramago, Benilde J.V.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of colloid and interface science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Michalski, Marie-Caroline</au><au>Hardy, Joël</au><au>Saramago, Benilde J.V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the Surface Free Energy of PVC/EVA Polymer Blends: Comparison of Different Calculation Methods</atitle><jtitle>Journal of colloid and interface science</jtitle><addtitle>J Colloid Interface Sci</addtitle><date>1998-12-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>208</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>319</spage><epage>328</epage><pages>319-328</pages><issn>0021-9797</issn><eissn>1095-7103</eissn><coden>JCISA5</coden><abstract>The surface free energy of polymeric films of polyvinylchloride (PVC) + poly(ethylene-co-vinylacetate) (EVA) blends was calculated using the van Oss treatment (Lifshitz and electron donor–electron acceptor components of surface free energy) and the Owens–Wendt treatment (dispersive and nondispersive components of surface free energy). Surface free energy results were found to be greatly dependent on the calculation method and on the number of standard liquids used for contact angle measurements. The nondispersive/donor–acceptor surface free energy component and the total surface free energy of polymeric films were always higher when the van Oss treatment was used compared to the Owens–Wendt treatment. Conversely, both methods led to similar apolar/Lifshitz components. All the calculation methods were in good agreement for the surface free energy of PVC; however, a discrepancy between the methods arose as EVA content in the blends increased. It seems that there is not yet a definite solution for the calculation of solid surface free energy. Further developments of existing models are needed in order to gain consistency when calculating this important physicochemical quantity.</abstract><cop>San Diego, CA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>9820780</pmid><doi>10.1006/jcis.1998.5814</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9797 |
ispartof | Journal of colloid and interface science, 1998-12, Vol.208 (1), p.319-328 |
issn | 0021-9797 1095-7103 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859215158 |
source | Elsevier |
subjects | acid–base interactions Applied sciences contact angle EVA Exact sciences and technology Organic polymers Physicochemistry of polymers polymer blends Properties and characterization PVC surface free energy surface free energy components Surface properties |
title | On the Surface Free Energy of PVC/EVA Polymer Blends: Comparison of Different Calculation Methods |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T19%3A55%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20Surface%20Free%20Energy%20of%20PVC/EVA%20Polymer%20Blends:%20Comparison%20of%20Different%20Calculation%20Methods&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20colloid%20and%20interface%20science&rft.au=Michalski,%20Marie-Caroline&rft.date=1998-12-01&rft.volume=208&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=319&rft.epage=328&rft.pages=319-328&rft.issn=0021-9797&rft.eissn=1095-7103&rft.coden=JCISA5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/jcis.1998.5814&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1859215158%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-9dd78a10bc13eb779f231ca4e00f6eb616a276a496adf12f36653df0d9b1cb1d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1859215158&rft_id=info:pmid/9820780&rfr_iscdi=true |