Rescue PTCA Following Failed Thrombolysis and Primary PTCA: A Retrospective Study of Angiographic and Clinical Outcome

• Published in: Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis 1997, Vol.4 (2), p.281-288
• Main Authors: Bär, FW, Ophnis, TJ, Frederiks, J, de Swart HB, van Ommen VG, de Zwaan C, Vermeer, F, Gorgels, AP, Wellens, HJ
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 1573-742X
• DOI: 10.1023/A:1008807321037

Evidence is increasing that a patent culprit artery improves the prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) has shown to be more effective than thrombolytic therapy alone. How effective is rescue PTCA after failed thrombolytic treatment? In a retrospective analysis, 176 consecutive patients with AMI and TIMI 0 or 1 perfusion grade were included. Patients had either rescue PTCA after failed thrombolysis (100 patients) or primary PTCA (76 patients). Angiographic data and in-hospital and 1-year outcome were analyzed. Comparison of baseline data of the two groups showed a higher proportion of long-standing angina and use of nitrates and aspirin in the primary PTCA group. Also, the delay between the onset of pain and PTCA was not significantly different, with a mean of 222 minutes for rescue PTCA and 245 minutes for primary PTCA (p = 0.52). The angiographic outcomes in the rescue PTCA group and the primary PTCA group were identical: The intervention was successful (TIMI 3 flow and residual stenosis