Loading…

A randomized blinded trial of preemptive local anesthesia in laparoscopy

Objective: Laparoscopy, while routinely performed in the outpatient setting, is associated with considerable postoperative discomfort. Continuing pain experienced after surgery is due to post-traumatic functional changes in both the peripheral nervous system (hyperalgesia) and the central nervous sy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Primary care update for Ob/Gyns 1998-07, Vol.5 (4), p.197-198
Main Authors: Ke, Raymond W., Portera, S.Gregory, Lincoln, Stephen R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2106-8e0140a674b74b58b0fc328d2b5a54e8a336ed43ed3e05e98df5c53a76cb653a3
cites
container_end_page 198
container_issue 4
container_start_page 197
container_title Primary care update for Ob/Gyns
container_volume 5
creator Ke, Raymond W.
Portera, S.Gregory
Lincoln, Stephen R.
description Objective: Laparoscopy, while routinely performed in the outpatient setting, is associated with considerable postoperative discomfort. Continuing pain experienced after surgery is due to post-traumatic functional changes in both the peripheral nervous system (hyperalgesia) and the central nervous system (hyperexcitability). Local anesthetic infiltrated at time of incision closure has limited effect because hypersensitivity and hyperexcitability have already developed. Preemptive analgesia refers to the blockage of afferent nerve fibers, before painful stimulus, which prevents or reduces subsequent pain even beyond the effect of the block. We tested the hypothesis that local anesthetic administered before skin incision, an example of preemptive analgesia, reduces postoperative pain for women undergoing laparoscopy, as compared to postincisional local anesthetic or placebo. Materials and Methods: Seventy-five patients undergoing laparoscopy for pelvic pain, infertility, or sterilization were randomized to one of three treatment groups. Two 10 mL syringes, labeled “Pre” and “Post,” were prepared at time of laparoscopy and contents blinded to anesthesiology, surgeons, and the patient. For treatment group A (preincisional), the presyringe contained 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine (50 mg) and the postsyringe contained 10 mL of 0.9% saline. For treatment group B (postincisional) patients, the presyringe contained 10 mL of 0.9% saline and the postsyringe contained 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine. For treatment group C (control) patients, both syringes contained 10 mL of 0.9% saline. All patients underwent a standardized general anesthetic induction and maintenance. After the patient was properly positioned and draped, 5 mL of the presyringe was infiltrated into the umbilical incision site. The remaining 5 mL was infiltrated in a similar fashion at the suprapubic trocar placement site. After laparoscopy and immediately prior to closure of the incisions, the postsyringe was infiltrated into both incisions above and below the fascia in a diamond-shaped pattern. For postoperative pain, oral ibuprofen was given, as needed, with 30 mg intramuscular ketorolac tromethamine given if the patient was unable to tolerate oral pain medication. All patients were discharged with 800 mg ibuprofen tablets and asked to take as needed for pain relief. The modified McGill Present Pain Intensity scale was evaluated by nurse interview at 30 minutes, 2 hours, 4 hours, and 24 hours after incision clo
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S1068-607X(98)00131-0
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859322210</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1068607X98001310</els_id><sourcerecordid>1859322210</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2106-8e0140a674b74b58b0fc328d2b5a54e8a336ed43ed3e05e98df5c53a76cb653a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkFFLwzAUhYMobk5_gtLH-VBNmibNnmQMdcLABxV8C2lyi5G2qUk3mL_ebJ3gmxA44fLdnJOD0CXBNwQTfvtCMBcpx8X7dCauMSaUpPgIjYkoRJpngh7H-y8yQmchfEaoILk4RSOCBRW04GO0nCdetcY19htMUta2NVF7b1WduCrpPEDT9XYDSe10nKkWQv8BwarEtkmtOuVd0K7bnqOTStUBLg46QW8P96-LZbp6fnxazFepzmKcVAAmOVa8yMt4mChxpWkmTFYyxXIQilIOJqdgKGAGM2EqphlVBdclj0onaDq823n3tY5hZGODhrqOydw6SCLYjGZZNIsoG1AdMwYPley8bZTfSoLlrkS5L1HuGpIzIfclyt3e1cFiXTZg_mwNrUXgbgAgfnRjwcugLbQajPWge2mc_cfiB0ahgX4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1859322210</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A randomized blinded trial of preemptive local anesthesia in laparoscopy</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Ke, Raymond W. ; Portera, S.Gregory ; Lincoln, Stephen R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ke, Raymond W. ; Portera, S.Gregory ; Lincoln, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: Laparoscopy, while routinely performed in the outpatient setting, is associated with considerable postoperative discomfort. Continuing pain experienced after surgery is due to post-traumatic functional changes in both the peripheral nervous system (hyperalgesia) and the central nervous system (hyperexcitability). Local anesthetic infiltrated at time of incision closure has limited effect because hypersensitivity and hyperexcitability have already developed. Preemptive analgesia refers to the blockage of afferent nerve fibers, before painful stimulus, which prevents or reduces subsequent pain even beyond the effect of the block. We tested the hypothesis that local anesthetic administered before skin incision, an example of preemptive analgesia, reduces postoperative pain for women undergoing laparoscopy, as compared to postincisional local anesthetic or placebo. Materials and Methods: Seventy-five patients undergoing laparoscopy for pelvic pain, infertility, or sterilization were randomized to one of three treatment groups. Two 10 mL syringes, labeled “Pre” and “Post,” were prepared at time of laparoscopy and contents blinded to anesthesiology, surgeons, and the patient. For treatment group A (preincisional), the presyringe contained 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine (50 mg) and the postsyringe contained 10 mL of 0.9% saline. For treatment group B (postincisional) patients, the presyringe contained 10 mL of 0.9% saline and the postsyringe contained 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine. For treatment group C (control) patients, both syringes contained 10 mL of 0.9% saline. All patients underwent a standardized general anesthetic induction and maintenance. After the patient was properly positioned and draped, 5 mL of the presyringe was infiltrated into the umbilical incision site. The remaining 5 mL was infiltrated in a similar fashion at the suprapubic trocar placement site. After laparoscopy and immediately prior to closure of the incisions, the postsyringe was infiltrated into both incisions above and below the fascia in a diamond-shaped pattern. For postoperative pain, oral ibuprofen was given, as needed, with 30 mg intramuscular ketorolac tromethamine given if the patient was unable to tolerate oral pain medication. All patients were discharged with 800 mg ibuprofen tablets and asked to take as needed for pain relief. The modified McGill Present Pain Intensity scale was evaluated by nurse interview at 30 minutes, 2 hours, 4 hours, and 24 hours after incision closure. Statistical analysis was accomplished using χ 2 tests for proportional data and ANOVA for pain scores and other parametric data. Results: Fifty-seven patients completed the study protocol. Age, weight, height, race, indication, and operating time did not vary significantly between the three groups. Patients in treatment group A ( n = 20) could tolerate a significantly longer time delay to their first analgesic medication. (A: 486.7 ± 435.3 minutes; B: 229.4 ± 330.4; C: 143.1 ± 156.7, P &lt; .001). Their 24-hour pain scores were also significantly lower than either treatment group B ( n = 19) or C ( n = 18) (A: 0.50 ± 0.9; B: 1.61 ± 1.3; C: 1.2 ± 1.2, P &lt; .02). Although statistical significance was not reached, patients in treatment group A required less total doses of analgesic than either treatment group B or C (A: 2.4 ± 1.6 doses; B: 3.1 ± 1.5; C: 3.1 ± 1.2, P = .07). Conclusions: Preemptive local anesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopy results in a longer time before analgesic is required and significantly lower pain 24 hours after surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1068-607X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-4283</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1068-607X(98)00131-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10838376</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Primary care update for Ob/Gyns, 1998-07, Vol.5 (4), p.197-198</ispartof><rights>1998 Elsevier Science Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2106-8e0140a674b74b58b0fc328d2b5a54e8a336ed43ed3e05e98df5c53a76cb653a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10838376$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ke, Raymond W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Portera, S.Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lincoln, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><title>A randomized blinded trial of preemptive local anesthesia in laparoscopy</title><title>Primary care update for Ob/Gyns</title><addtitle>Prim Care Update Ob Gyns</addtitle><description>Objective: Laparoscopy, while routinely performed in the outpatient setting, is associated with considerable postoperative discomfort. Continuing pain experienced after surgery is due to post-traumatic functional changes in both the peripheral nervous system (hyperalgesia) and the central nervous system (hyperexcitability). Local anesthetic infiltrated at time of incision closure has limited effect because hypersensitivity and hyperexcitability have already developed. Preemptive analgesia refers to the blockage of afferent nerve fibers, before painful stimulus, which prevents or reduces subsequent pain even beyond the effect of the block. We tested the hypothesis that local anesthetic administered before skin incision, an example of preemptive analgesia, reduces postoperative pain for women undergoing laparoscopy, as compared to postincisional local anesthetic or placebo. Materials and Methods: Seventy-five patients undergoing laparoscopy for pelvic pain, infertility, or sterilization were randomized to one of three treatment groups. Two 10 mL syringes, labeled “Pre” and “Post,” were prepared at time of laparoscopy and contents blinded to anesthesiology, surgeons, and the patient. For treatment group A (preincisional), the presyringe contained 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine (50 mg) and the postsyringe contained 10 mL of 0.9% saline. For treatment group B (postincisional) patients, the presyringe contained 10 mL of 0.9% saline and the postsyringe contained 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine. For treatment group C (control) patients, both syringes contained 10 mL of 0.9% saline. All patients underwent a standardized general anesthetic induction and maintenance. After the patient was properly positioned and draped, 5 mL of the presyringe was infiltrated into the umbilical incision site. The remaining 5 mL was infiltrated in a similar fashion at the suprapubic trocar placement site. After laparoscopy and immediately prior to closure of the incisions, the postsyringe was infiltrated into both incisions above and below the fascia in a diamond-shaped pattern. For postoperative pain, oral ibuprofen was given, as needed, with 30 mg intramuscular ketorolac tromethamine given if the patient was unable to tolerate oral pain medication. All patients were discharged with 800 mg ibuprofen tablets and asked to take as needed for pain relief. The modified McGill Present Pain Intensity scale was evaluated by nurse interview at 30 minutes, 2 hours, 4 hours, and 24 hours after incision closure. Statistical analysis was accomplished using χ 2 tests for proportional data and ANOVA for pain scores and other parametric data. Results: Fifty-seven patients completed the study protocol. Age, weight, height, race, indication, and operating time did not vary significantly between the three groups. Patients in treatment group A ( n = 20) could tolerate a significantly longer time delay to their first analgesic medication. (A: 486.7 ± 435.3 minutes; B: 229.4 ± 330.4; C: 143.1 ± 156.7, P &lt; .001). Their 24-hour pain scores were also significantly lower than either treatment group B ( n = 19) or C ( n = 18) (A: 0.50 ± 0.9; B: 1.61 ± 1.3; C: 1.2 ± 1.2, P &lt; .02). Although statistical significance was not reached, patients in treatment group A required less total doses of analgesic than either treatment group B or C (A: 2.4 ± 1.6 doses; B: 3.1 ± 1.5; C: 3.1 ± 1.2, P = .07). Conclusions: Preemptive local anesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopy results in a longer time before analgesic is required and significantly lower pain 24 hours after surgery.</description><issn>1068-607X</issn><issn>1878-4283</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkFFLwzAUhYMobk5_gtLH-VBNmibNnmQMdcLABxV8C2lyi5G2qUk3mL_ebJ3gmxA44fLdnJOD0CXBNwQTfvtCMBcpx8X7dCauMSaUpPgIjYkoRJpngh7H-y8yQmchfEaoILk4RSOCBRW04GO0nCdetcY19htMUta2NVF7b1WduCrpPEDT9XYDSe10nKkWQv8BwarEtkmtOuVd0K7bnqOTStUBLg46QW8P96-LZbp6fnxazFepzmKcVAAmOVa8yMt4mChxpWkmTFYyxXIQilIOJqdgKGAGM2EqphlVBdclj0onaDq823n3tY5hZGODhrqOydw6SCLYjGZZNIsoG1AdMwYPley8bZTfSoLlrkS5L1HuGpIzIfclyt3e1cFiXTZg_mwNrUXgbgAgfnRjwcugLbQajPWge2mc_cfiB0ahgX4</recordid><startdate>19980701</startdate><enddate>19980701</enddate><creator>Ke, Raymond W.</creator><creator>Portera, S.Gregory</creator><creator>Lincoln, Stephen R.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980701</creationdate><title>A randomized blinded trial of preemptive local anesthesia in laparoscopy</title><author>Ke, Raymond W. ; Portera, S.Gregory ; Lincoln, Stephen R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2106-8e0140a674b74b58b0fc328d2b5a54e8a336ed43ed3e05e98df5c53a76cb653a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ke, Raymond W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Portera, S.Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lincoln, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Primary care update for Ob/Gyns</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ke, Raymond W.</au><au>Portera, S.Gregory</au><au>Lincoln, Stephen R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A randomized blinded trial of preemptive local anesthesia in laparoscopy</atitle><jtitle>Primary care update for Ob/Gyns</jtitle><addtitle>Prim Care Update Ob Gyns</addtitle><date>1998-07-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>197</spage><epage>198</epage><pages>197-198</pages><issn>1068-607X</issn><eissn>1878-4283</eissn><abstract>Objective: Laparoscopy, while routinely performed in the outpatient setting, is associated with considerable postoperative discomfort. Continuing pain experienced after surgery is due to post-traumatic functional changes in both the peripheral nervous system (hyperalgesia) and the central nervous system (hyperexcitability). Local anesthetic infiltrated at time of incision closure has limited effect because hypersensitivity and hyperexcitability have already developed. Preemptive analgesia refers to the blockage of afferent nerve fibers, before painful stimulus, which prevents or reduces subsequent pain even beyond the effect of the block. We tested the hypothesis that local anesthetic administered before skin incision, an example of preemptive analgesia, reduces postoperative pain for women undergoing laparoscopy, as compared to postincisional local anesthetic or placebo. Materials and Methods: Seventy-five patients undergoing laparoscopy for pelvic pain, infertility, or sterilization were randomized to one of three treatment groups. Two 10 mL syringes, labeled “Pre” and “Post,” were prepared at time of laparoscopy and contents blinded to anesthesiology, surgeons, and the patient. For treatment group A (preincisional), the presyringe contained 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine (50 mg) and the postsyringe contained 10 mL of 0.9% saline. For treatment group B (postincisional) patients, the presyringe contained 10 mL of 0.9% saline and the postsyringe contained 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine. For treatment group C (control) patients, both syringes contained 10 mL of 0.9% saline. All patients underwent a standardized general anesthetic induction and maintenance. After the patient was properly positioned and draped, 5 mL of the presyringe was infiltrated into the umbilical incision site. The remaining 5 mL was infiltrated in a similar fashion at the suprapubic trocar placement site. After laparoscopy and immediately prior to closure of the incisions, the postsyringe was infiltrated into both incisions above and below the fascia in a diamond-shaped pattern. For postoperative pain, oral ibuprofen was given, as needed, with 30 mg intramuscular ketorolac tromethamine given if the patient was unable to tolerate oral pain medication. All patients were discharged with 800 mg ibuprofen tablets and asked to take as needed for pain relief. The modified McGill Present Pain Intensity scale was evaluated by nurse interview at 30 minutes, 2 hours, 4 hours, and 24 hours after incision closure. Statistical analysis was accomplished using χ 2 tests for proportional data and ANOVA for pain scores and other parametric data. Results: Fifty-seven patients completed the study protocol. Age, weight, height, race, indication, and operating time did not vary significantly between the three groups. Patients in treatment group A ( n = 20) could tolerate a significantly longer time delay to their first analgesic medication. (A: 486.7 ± 435.3 minutes; B: 229.4 ± 330.4; C: 143.1 ± 156.7, P &lt; .001). Their 24-hour pain scores were also significantly lower than either treatment group B ( n = 19) or C ( n = 18) (A: 0.50 ± 0.9; B: 1.61 ± 1.3; C: 1.2 ± 1.2, P &lt; .02). Although statistical significance was not reached, patients in treatment group A required less total doses of analgesic than either treatment group B or C (A: 2.4 ± 1.6 doses; B: 3.1 ± 1.5; C: 3.1 ± 1.2, P = .07). Conclusions: Preemptive local anesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopy results in a longer time before analgesic is required and significantly lower pain 24 hours after surgery.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>10838376</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1068-607X(98)00131-0</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1068-607X
ispartof Primary care update for Ob/Gyns, 1998-07, Vol.5 (4), p.197-198
issn 1068-607X
1878-4283
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859322210
source ScienceDirect Journals
title A randomized blinded trial of preemptive local anesthesia in laparoscopy
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T19%3A37%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20randomized%20blinded%20trial%20of%20preemptive%20local%20anesthesia%20in%20laparoscopy&rft.jtitle=Primary%20care%20update%20for%20Ob/Gyns&rft.au=Ke,%20Raymond%20W.&rft.date=1998-07-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=197&rft.epage=198&rft.pages=197-198&rft.issn=1068-607X&rft.eissn=1878-4283&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1068-607X(98)00131-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1859322210%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2106-8e0140a674b74b58b0fc328d2b5a54e8a336ed43ed3e05e98df5c53a76cb653a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1859322210&rft_id=info:pmid/10838376&rfr_iscdi=true