Loading…
Human recognition memory: a cognitive neuroscience perspective
For many years the cognitive processes underlying recognition memory have been the subject of considerable interest in experimental psychology. To account for a broad range of behavioral findings, psychologists have put forward a variety of ‘dual-process’ models, all of which propose that recognitio...
Saved in:
Published in: | Trends in cognitive sciences 2003-07, Vol.7 (7), p.313-319 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-11a5143e48960de07b7d955cc54f0d1029f82ba7921ac6852f0510dec18d07e43 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-11a5143e48960de07b7d955cc54f0d1029f82ba7921ac6852f0510dec18d07e43 |
container_end_page | 319 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 313 |
container_title | Trends in cognitive sciences |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Rugg, Michael D. Yonelinas, Andrew P. |
description | For many years the cognitive processes underlying recognition memory have been the subject of considerable interest in experimental psychology. To account for a broad range of behavioral findings, psychologists have put forward a variety of ‘dual-process’ models, all of which propose that recognition memory is supported by two forms of memory – familiarity and recollection – that differ in their speed of operation and the specificity of the retrieved information. More recently, the dual-process framework has been extended to encompass findings from studies investigating the neural basis of recognition memory. Results from neuropsychological, ERP and functional neuroimaging studies can be accommodated within the framework, and suggest that familiarity and recollection are supported by distinct neural mechanisms. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00131-1 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859410066</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1364661303001311</els_id><sourcerecordid>1859410066</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-11a5143e48960de07b7d955cc54f0d1029f82ba7921ac6852f0510dec18d07e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLxDAQgIMo7rr6E5Qe10N1pm3S1oMiiy9Y8KCCt5BNpxLZPkzahf33pm7FozCQYfLNTPIxdopwgYDi8gVjkYRCYDyH-BwAYwxxj00xS_MwhvR93-e_yIQdOffpIZ6m4pBNMMoEYA5Tdv3YV6oOLOnmozadaeqgoqqx26tABWNtQ0FNvW2cNlRrClqyriU9XByzg1KtHZ2M54y93d-9Lh7D5fPD0-J2Geokwy5EVByTmJIsF1AQpKu0yDnXmiclFAhRXmbRSqV5hEqLjEclcPSgxqyAlJJ4xua7ua1tvnpynayM07Req5qa3knMeJ4ggBAe5TtU-xc7S6VsramU3UoEOaiTP-rk4EWCj0GdRN93Nq7oVxUVf12jKw_c7ADyH90YsnIUUhivr5NFY_5Z8Q0Hy30O</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1859410066</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Human recognition memory: a cognitive neuroscience perspective</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Rugg, Michael D. ; Yonelinas, Andrew P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rugg, Michael D. ; Yonelinas, Andrew P.</creatorcontrib><description>For many years the cognitive processes underlying recognition memory have been the subject of considerable interest in experimental psychology. To account for a broad range of behavioral findings, psychologists have put forward a variety of ‘dual-process’ models, all of which propose that recognition memory is supported by two forms of memory – familiarity and recollection – that differ in their speed of operation and the specificity of the retrieved information. More recently, the dual-process framework has been extended to encompass findings from studies investigating the neural basis of recognition memory. Results from neuropsychological, ERP and functional neuroimaging studies can be accommodated within the framework, and suggest that familiarity and recollection are supported by distinct neural mechanisms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-6613</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-307X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00131-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12860190</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Trends in cognitive sciences, 2003-07, Vol.7 (7), p.313-319</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-11a5143e48960de07b7d955cc54f0d1029f82ba7921ac6852f0510dec18d07e43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-11a5143e48960de07b7d955cc54f0d1029f82ba7921ac6852f0510dec18d07e43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12860190$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rugg, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yonelinas, Andrew P.</creatorcontrib><title>Human recognition memory: a cognitive neuroscience perspective</title><title>Trends in cognitive sciences</title><addtitle>Trends Cogn Sci</addtitle><description>For many years the cognitive processes underlying recognition memory have been the subject of considerable interest in experimental psychology. To account for a broad range of behavioral findings, psychologists have put forward a variety of ‘dual-process’ models, all of which propose that recognition memory is supported by two forms of memory – familiarity and recollection – that differ in their speed of operation and the specificity of the retrieved information. More recently, the dual-process framework has been extended to encompass findings from studies investigating the neural basis of recognition memory. Results from neuropsychological, ERP and functional neuroimaging studies can be accommodated within the framework, and suggest that familiarity and recollection are supported by distinct neural mechanisms.</description><issn>1364-6613</issn><issn>1879-307X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLxDAQgIMo7rr6E5Qe10N1pm3S1oMiiy9Y8KCCt5BNpxLZPkzahf33pm7FozCQYfLNTPIxdopwgYDi8gVjkYRCYDyH-BwAYwxxj00xS_MwhvR93-e_yIQdOffpIZ6m4pBNMMoEYA5Tdv3YV6oOLOnmozadaeqgoqqx26tABWNtQ0FNvW2cNlRrClqyriU9XByzg1KtHZ2M54y93d-9Lh7D5fPD0-J2Geokwy5EVByTmJIsF1AQpKu0yDnXmiclFAhRXmbRSqV5hEqLjEclcPSgxqyAlJJ4xua7ua1tvnpynayM07Req5qa3knMeJ4ggBAe5TtU-xc7S6VsramU3UoEOaiTP-rk4EWCj0GdRN93Nq7oVxUVf12jKw_c7ADyH90YsnIUUhivr5NFY_5Z8Q0Hy30O</recordid><startdate>20030701</startdate><enddate>20030701</enddate><creator>Rugg, Michael D.</creator><creator>Yonelinas, Andrew P.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030701</creationdate><title>Human recognition memory: a cognitive neuroscience perspective</title><author>Rugg, Michael D. ; Yonelinas, Andrew P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-11a5143e48960de07b7d955cc54f0d1029f82ba7921ac6852f0510dec18d07e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rugg, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yonelinas, Andrew P.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Trends in cognitive sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rugg, Michael D.</au><au>Yonelinas, Andrew P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Human recognition memory: a cognitive neuroscience perspective</atitle><jtitle>Trends in cognitive sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Trends Cogn Sci</addtitle><date>2003-07-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>313</spage><epage>319</epage><pages>313-319</pages><issn>1364-6613</issn><eissn>1879-307X</eissn><abstract>For many years the cognitive processes underlying recognition memory have been the subject of considerable interest in experimental psychology. To account for a broad range of behavioral findings, psychologists have put forward a variety of ‘dual-process’ models, all of which propose that recognition memory is supported by two forms of memory – familiarity and recollection – that differ in their speed of operation and the specificity of the retrieved information. More recently, the dual-process framework has been extended to encompass findings from studies investigating the neural basis of recognition memory. Results from neuropsychological, ERP and functional neuroimaging studies can be accommodated within the framework, and suggest that familiarity and recollection are supported by distinct neural mechanisms.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>12860190</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00131-1</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1364-6613 |
ispartof | Trends in cognitive sciences, 2003-07, Vol.7 (7), p.313-319 |
issn | 1364-6613 1879-307X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859410066 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
title | Human recognition memory: a cognitive neuroscience perspective |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T13%3A01%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Human%20recognition%20memory:%20a%20cognitive%20neuroscience%20perspective&rft.jtitle=Trends%20in%20cognitive%20sciences&rft.au=Rugg,%20Michael%20D.&rft.date=2003-07-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=313&rft.epage=319&rft.pages=313-319&rft.issn=1364-6613&rft.eissn=1879-307X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00131-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1859410066%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-11a5143e48960de07b7d955cc54f0d1029f82ba7921ac6852f0510dec18d07e43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1859410066&rft_id=info:pmid/12860190&rfr_iscdi=true |