CT Rather Than Invasive Angiography for Pregnant Patients With NSTEMI?: More Delay and More Radiation

Furthermore, in the developed world, as older women become pregnant, classical risk factors for atherosclerotic coronary disease are likely to become more important (5). [...]after clinical evaluation, and urgent echocardiography to look for supportive evidence of alternative diagnoses (e.g., aortic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2016-12, Vol.68 (24), p.2716-2717
Main Author: Joshi, Francis R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Acute coronary syndromes
Cardiology
Coronary Angiography
Coronary vessels
Dissection
Electrocardiography
Female
Heart attacks
Humans
Medical imaging
Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction
Patients
Pregnancy
Radiation Dosage
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 2717
container_issue 24
container_start_page 2716
container_title Journal of the American College of Cardiology
container_volume 68
creator Joshi, Francis R.
description Furthermore, in the developed world, as older women become pregnant, classical risk factors for atherosclerotic coronary disease are likely to become more important (5). [...]after clinical evaluation, and urgent echocardiography to look for supportive evidence of alternative diagnoses (e.g., aortic dissection and Takotsubo cardiomyopathy), the best place to clarify diagnosis and prognosis as well as offer treatment is surely the catheterization laboratory, as it would be for any young patient presenting with an acute coronary syndrome.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.08.075
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859471588</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0735109716365925</els_id><sourcerecordid>4278219511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e240t-6d2b2df8242a4367901c448c3bb29b7522a01896fcae47c99b3ca2652a783803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0U-LEzEYBvAgiltXv4AHCXjxMmP-ThIRZKm7a2FXl3XAY8hk3rYZ2kxNpoV-e1O6Xjx5yhv48cL7PAi9paSmhDYfh3pw3teszDXRNVHyGZpRKXXFpVHP0YwoLitKjLpAr3IeCCGNpuYlumDKKG2kmSGYt_jRTWtIuF27iBfx4HI4AL6KqzCuktutj3g5JvyQYBVdnPCDmwLEKeNfYVrj7z_b6_vFl0_4fkyAv8LGHbGL_fn76PpQ9BhfoxdLt8nw5um9RO3NdTv_Vt39uF3Mr-4qYIJMVdOzjvVLzQRzgjfKEOqF0J53HTOdkow5QrVplt6BUN6YjnvHGsmc0lwTfok-nNfu0vh7D3my25A9bDYuwrjPlmpphKJS6_-hrNFcGFno-3_oMO5TLHcUJbQyWlJe1Lsnte-20NtdCluXjvZv1AV8PgMoARwCJJt9CdJDHxL4yfZjsJTYU7N2sKdm7alZS7QtzfI_ixOSrA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1848798513</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>CT Rather Than Invasive Angiography for Pregnant Patients With NSTEMI?: More Delay and More Radiation</title><source>BACON - Elsevier - GLOBAL_SCIENCEDIRECT-OPENACCESS</source><creator>Joshi, Francis R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Joshi, Francis R.</creatorcontrib><description>Furthermore, in the developed world, as older women become pregnant, classical risk factors for atherosclerotic coronary disease are likely to become more important (5). [...]after clinical evaluation, and urgent echocardiography to look for supportive evidence of alternative diagnoses (e.g., aortic dissection and Takotsubo cardiomyopathy), the best place to clarify diagnosis and prognosis as well as offer treatment is surely the catheterization laboratory, as it would be for any young patient presenting with an acute coronary syndrome.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-1097</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-3597</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.08.075</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27978959</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Acute coronary syndromes ; Cardiology ; Coronary Angiography ; Coronary vessels ; Dissection ; Electrocardiography ; Female ; Heart attacks ; Humans ; Medical imaging ; Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction ; Patients ; Pregnancy ; Radiation Dosage ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2016-12, Vol.68 (24), p.2716-2717</ispartof><rights>2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Dec 20, 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27978959$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Joshi, Francis R.</creatorcontrib><title>CT Rather Than Invasive Angiography for Pregnant Patients With NSTEMI?: More Delay and More Radiation</title><title>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</title><addtitle>J Am Coll Cardiol</addtitle><description>Furthermore, in the developed world, as older women become pregnant, classical risk factors for atherosclerotic coronary disease are likely to become more important (5). [...]after clinical evaluation, and urgent echocardiography to look for supportive evidence of alternative diagnoses (e.g., aortic dissection and Takotsubo cardiomyopathy), the best place to clarify diagnosis and prognosis as well as offer treatment is surely the catheterization laboratory, as it would be for any young patient presenting with an acute coronary syndrome.</description><subject>Acute coronary syndromes</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Coronary Angiography</subject><subject>Coronary vessels</subject><subject>Dissection</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart attacks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><issn>0735-1097</issn><issn>1558-3597</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0U-LEzEYBvAgiltXv4AHCXjxMmP-ThIRZKm7a2FXl3XAY8hk3rYZ2kxNpoV-e1O6Xjx5yhv48cL7PAi9paSmhDYfh3pw3teszDXRNVHyGZpRKXXFpVHP0YwoLitKjLpAr3IeCCGNpuYlumDKKG2kmSGYt_jRTWtIuF27iBfx4HI4AL6KqzCuktutj3g5JvyQYBVdnPCDmwLEKeNfYVrj7z_b6_vFl0_4fkyAv8LGHbGL_fn76PpQ9BhfoxdLt8nw5um9RO3NdTv_Vt39uF3Mr-4qYIJMVdOzjvVLzQRzgjfKEOqF0J53HTOdkow5QrVplt6BUN6YjnvHGsmc0lwTfok-nNfu0vh7D3my25A9bDYuwrjPlmpphKJS6_-hrNFcGFno-3_oMO5TLHcUJbQyWlJe1Lsnte-20NtdCluXjvZv1AV8PgMoARwCJJt9CdJDHxL4yfZjsJTYU7N2sKdm7alZS7QtzfI_ixOSrA</recordid><startdate>20161220</startdate><enddate>20161220</enddate><creator>Joshi, Francis R.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161220</creationdate><title>CT Rather Than Invasive Angiography for Pregnant Patients With NSTEMI?: More Delay and More Radiation</title><author>Joshi, Francis R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e240t-6d2b2df8242a4367901c448c3bb29b7522a01896fcae47c99b3ca2652a783803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Acute coronary syndromes</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Coronary Angiography</topic><topic>Coronary vessels</topic><topic>Dissection</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart attacks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Joshi, Francis R.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Joshi, Francis R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CT Rather Than Invasive Angiography for Pregnant Patients With NSTEMI?: More Delay and More Radiation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Coll Cardiol</addtitle><date>2016-12-20</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>2716</spage><epage>2717</epage><pages>2716-2717</pages><issn>0735-1097</issn><eissn>1558-3597</eissn><abstract>Furthermore, in the developed world, as older women become pregnant, classical risk factors for atherosclerotic coronary disease are likely to become more important (5). [...]after clinical evaluation, and urgent echocardiography to look for supportive evidence of alternative diagnoses (e.g., aortic dissection and Takotsubo cardiomyopathy), the best place to clarify diagnosis and prognosis as well as offer treatment is surely the catheterization laboratory, as it would be for any young patient presenting with an acute coronary syndrome.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27978959</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jacc.2016.08.075</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0735-1097
ispartof Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2016-12, Vol.68 (24), p.2716-2717
issn 0735-1097
1558-3597
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859471588
source BACON - Elsevier - GLOBAL_SCIENCEDIRECT-OPENACCESS
subjects Acute coronary syndromes
Cardiology
Coronary Angiography
Coronary vessels
Dissection
Electrocardiography
Female
Heart attacks
Humans
Medical imaging
Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction
Patients
Pregnancy
Radiation Dosage
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
title CT Rather Than Invasive Angiography for Pregnant Patients With NSTEMI?: More Delay and More Radiation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T17%3A56%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CT%20Rather%20Than%20Invasive%20Angiography%20for%20Pregnant%20Patients%20With%20NSTEMI?:%20More%20Delay%20and%20More%20Radiation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20College%20of%20Cardiology&rft.au=Joshi,%20Francis%20R.&rft.date=2016-12-20&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=2716&rft.epage=2717&rft.pages=2716-2717&rft.issn=0735-1097&rft.eissn=1558-3597&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.08.075&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4278219511%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e240t-6d2b2df8242a4367901c448c3bb29b7522a01896fcae47c99b3ca2652a783803%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1848798513&rft_id=info:pmid/27978959&rfr_iscdi=true