Effects of Conifer Expansion on Greater Sage-Grouse Nesting Habitat Selection

Expansion of conifer woodlands into sagebrush (Artemisia spp.) ecosystems is a primary threat to the greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) in the Great Basin, southeast Oregon, USA. Conifer removal to restore sage-grouse habitats has been widely implemented, yet limited information exists...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of wildlife management 2017-01, Vol.81 (1), p.86-95
Main Authors: SEVERSON, JOHN P., HAGEN, CHRISTIAN A., MAESTAS, JEREMY D., NAUGLE, DAVID E., FORBES, J. TODD, REESE, KERRY P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Animal reproduction
Artemisia
Centrocercus urophasianus
conifer expansion
Coniferous trees
Conservation areas
Encroachment
Great Basin
Habitat availability
Habitat Relations
Habitat selection
Habitats
Juniperus occidentalis
Landscape
Nesting
Nests
sagebrush
sage‐grouse
Trees
western juniper
Wildfowl
Wildlife
Wildlife conservation
Wildlife management
Woodlands
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Expansion of conifer woodlands into sagebrush (Artemisia spp.) ecosystems is a primary threat to the greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) in the Great Basin, southeast Oregon, USA. Conifer removal to restore sage-grouse habitats has been widely implemented, yet limited information exists on the effects of conifer expansion on sage-grouse habitat selection. Our objective was to evaluate the landscape-scale effects of conifer expansion on selection of sites for nesting and to estimate direction, magnitude, and scale of effects. We classified 160 nests and 167 available sites with random forests during 2010–2011 to assess effects of conifer cover and tree clustering at multiple scales along with other vegetation and topographic covariates on selection of nesting habitat. Relative probability of nesting was negatively associated with >3% conifer cover within 800 m of nests. When trees were present within 800 m of nests, sage-grouse nested where trees were clustered rather than dispersed, suggesting selection for more open habitat. Results further indicated that sage-grouse are nesting in landscapes susceptible to conifer expansion that have yet to be invaded. Sage-grouse are expected to lose nesting habitat as conifer expansion continues, but management intervention may be a possible solution to increase habitat availability where open space for nesting is a limiting factor.
ISSN:0022-541X
1937-2817
DOI:10.1002/jwmg.21183