Immediate compared with on‐demand maternal full feeding after planned caesarean delivery: a randomised trial

Objective To evaluate immediate compared with on‐demand full maternal oral feeding after caesarean delivery Study design A randomised trial. Setting Obstetric unit of a university hospital in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Population Women admitted for a planned caesarean under spinal anaesthesia. Methods...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2017-01, Vol.124 (1), p.123-131
Main Authors: Tan, PC, Alzergany, MM, Adlan, A‐S, Noor Azmi, MA, Omar, SZ
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Caesarean
Cesarean section
Childbirth & labor
Diet
Eating behavior
maternal feeding
Mothers
patient satisfaction
randomised trial
vomiting
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective To evaluate immediate compared with on‐demand full maternal oral feeding after caesarean delivery Study design A randomised trial. Setting Obstetric unit of a university hospital in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Population Women admitted for a planned caesarean under spinal anaesthesia. Methods Participants were randomised to a sandwich meal served immediately on return to the ward or on‐demand. Main outcome measures Primary outcomes were patient satisfaction VAS (visual analog scale of 100 mm) on the feeding regimen and vomiting at 24 hours. Results 453 women were initially enrolled, 395 were randomised and available for analysis. Median (full range) patient satisfaction VAS scores were 82 (15–100) versus 84 (0–100) mm, P = 0.88 and vomiting rates were 1/197 (0.5%) versus 2/198 (1.0%), P > 0.99 for immediate compared with on‐demand feeding, respectively. The immediate versus on‐demand arms first ate at a median of 105 (35–210) versus 165 (45–385) minutes, P 
ISSN:1470-0328
1471-0528
DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.14211