Immediate compared with on‐demand maternal full feeding after planned caesarean delivery: a randomised trial

Objective To evaluate immediate compared with on‐demand full maternal oral feeding after caesarean delivery Study design A randomised trial. Setting Obstetric unit of a university hospital in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Population Women admitted for a planned caesarean under spinal anaesthesia. Methods...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2017-01, Vol.124 (1), p.123-131
Main Authors: Tan, PC, Alzergany, MM, Adlan, A‐S, Noor Azmi, MA, Omar, SZ
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Caesarean
Cesarean section
Childbirth & labor
Diet
Eating behavior
maternal feeding
Mothers
patient satisfaction
randomised trial
vomiting
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5001-b2f371d85e03c5a6b2b28f99067209e5f79d8050a380e4bdc79e744cd49fc7783
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5001-b2f371d85e03c5a6b2b28f99067209e5f79d8050a380e4bdc79e744cd49fc7783
container_end_page 131
container_issue 1
container_start_page 123
container_title BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
container_volume 124
creator Tan, PC
Alzergany, MM
Adlan, A‐S
Noor Azmi, MA
Omar, SZ
description Objective To evaluate immediate compared with on‐demand full maternal oral feeding after caesarean delivery Study design A randomised trial. Setting Obstetric unit of a university hospital in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Population Women admitted for a planned caesarean under spinal anaesthesia. Methods Participants were randomised to a sandwich meal served immediately on return to the ward or on‐demand. Main outcome measures Primary outcomes were patient satisfaction VAS (visual analog scale of 100 mm) on the feeding regimen and vomiting at 24 hours. Results 453 women were initially enrolled, 395 were randomised and available for analysis. Median (full range) patient satisfaction VAS scores were 82 (15–100) versus 84 (0–100) mm, P = 0.88 and vomiting rates were 1/197 (0.5%) versus 2/198 (1.0%), P > 0.99 for immediate compared with on‐demand feeding, respectively. The immediate versus on‐demand arms first ate at a median of 105 (35–210) versus 165 (45–385) minutes, P 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1471-0528.14211
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859488103</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1859488103</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5001-b2f371d85e03c5a6b2b28f99067209e5f79d8050a380e4bdc79e744cd49fc7783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkbtOAzEQRS0EIrxqOmSJhmbB9q5jLx1EPIVEA7XltWdho30EO0uUjk_gG_kSJglQ0IAL2xqfez2aS8g-Z8cc1wnPFE-YFPqYZ4LzNbL1U1lf3lnCUqEHZDvGMWN8KFi6SQZCZVxzlW-R9qZpwFd2CtR1zcQG8HRWTZ9p1368vXtobOtpg8-htTUt-xo3QEH7RG2JVTqpbduiyFmIqLYt9VBXrxDmp9TSgPKuqSIC01DZepdslLaOsPd17pDHy4uH0XVyd391Mzq7S5zELpNClKniXktgqZN2WIhC6DLP2VAJloMsVe41k8ymmkFWeKdyUFnmfJaXTimd7pCjle8kdC89xKnBJhzU2Cx0fTRcyzzTmrP0H6jAX3GUCtHDX-i46xeDWRryoZRCMaROVpQLXYwBSjMJVWPD3HBmFqmZRUZmkZFZpoaKgy_fvsA0fvjvmBCQK2BW1TD_y8-c396vjD8Bb-2hKQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1851655270</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Immediate compared with on‐demand maternal full feeding after planned caesarean delivery: a randomised trial</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Tan, PC ; Alzergany, MM ; Adlan, A‐S ; Noor Azmi, MA ; Omar, SZ</creator><creatorcontrib>Tan, PC ; Alzergany, MM ; Adlan, A‐S ; Noor Azmi, MA ; Omar, SZ</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To evaluate immediate compared with on‐demand full maternal oral feeding after caesarean delivery Study design A randomised trial. Setting Obstetric unit of a university hospital in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Population Women admitted for a planned caesarean under spinal anaesthesia. Methods Participants were randomised to a sandwich meal served immediately on return to the ward or on‐demand. Main outcome measures Primary outcomes were patient satisfaction VAS (visual analog scale of 100 mm) on the feeding regimen and vomiting at 24 hours. Results 453 women were initially enrolled, 395 were randomised and available for analysis. Median (full range) patient satisfaction VAS scores were 82 (15–100) versus 84 (0–100) mm, P = 0.88 and vomiting rates were 1/197 (0.5%) versus 2/198 (1.0%), P &gt; 0.99 for immediate compared with on‐demand feeding, respectively. The immediate versus on‐demand arms first ate at a median of 105 (35–210) versus 165 (45–385) minutes, P &lt; 0.001, had second meal at 5.3 (1.2–15.5) versus 5.8 (2.2–29.7), P &lt; 0.001, flatus passage at 9.5 (3.1–29.0) versus 10.3 (2.8–24.6), P = 0.023 hours post‐caesarean and opiate analgesia use was 10/197 (5.1%) versus 23/198 (11.6%), P = 0.028, RR 0.4 (95% CI 0.2–0.9), NNTb 16 (95% CI 8–89). The median visual numerical rating scale (0–10 scale) for nausea and bloating at 8, 16 and 24 hours was similarly scored at zero in both arms. Other outcomes were similar. Conclusion Immediate full feeding has some advantage over on‐demand feeding. Both regimens are tolerated well. Patients probably should be fed as soon as practicable after a caesarean. Tweetable Full maternal oral feeding should commence as soon as practicable after an uncomplicated caesarean section. Tweetable Full maternal oral feeding should commence as soon as practicable after an uncomplicated caesarean section.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-0328</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-0528</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14211</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27418179</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BIOGFQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Caesarean ; Cesarean section ; Childbirth &amp; labor ; Diet ; Eating behavior ; maternal feeding ; Mothers ; patient satisfaction ; randomised trial ; vomiting</subject><ispartof>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2017-01, Vol.124 (1), p.123-131</ispartof><rights>2016 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists</rights><rights>2016 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5001-b2f371d85e03c5a6b2b28f99067209e5f79d8050a380e4bdc79e744cd49fc7783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5001-b2f371d85e03c5a6b2b28f99067209e5f79d8050a380e4bdc79e744cd49fc7783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27418179$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tan, PC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alzergany, MM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adlan, A‐S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noor Azmi, MA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omar, SZ</creatorcontrib><title>Immediate compared with on‐demand maternal full feeding after planned caesarean delivery: a randomised trial</title><title>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</title><addtitle>BJOG</addtitle><description>Objective To evaluate immediate compared with on‐demand full maternal oral feeding after caesarean delivery Study design A randomised trial. Setting Obstetric unit of a university hospital in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Population Women admitted for a planned caesarean under spinal anaesthesia. Methods Participants were randomised to a sandwich meal served immediately on return to the ward or on‐demand. Main outcome measures Primary outcomes were patient satisfaction VAS (visual analog scale of 100 mm) on the feeding regimen and vomiting at 24 hours. Results 453 women were initially enrolled, 395 were randomised and available for analysis. Median (full range) patient satisfaction VAS scores were 82 (15–100) versus 84 (0–100) mm, P = 0.88 and vomiting rates were 1/197 (0.5%) versus 2/198 (1.0%), P &gt; 0.99 for immediate compared with on‐demand feeding, respectively. The immediate versus on‐demand arms first ate at a median of 105 (35–210) versus 165 (45–385) minutes, P &lt; 0.001, had second meal at 5.3 (1.2–15.5) versus 5.8 (2.2–29.7), P &lt; 0.001, flatus passage at 9.5 (3.1–29.0) versus 10.3 (2.8–24.6), P = 0.023 hours post‐caesarean and opiate analgesia use was 10/197 (5.1%) versus 23/198 (11.6%), P = 0.028, RR 0.4 (95% CI 0.2–0.9), NNTb 16 (95% CI 8–89). The median visual numerical rating scale (0–10 scale) for nausea and bloating at 8, 16 and 24 hours was similarly scored at zero in both arms. Other outcomes were similar. Conclusion Immediate full feeding has some advantage over on‐demand feeding. Both regimens are tolerated well. Patients probably should be fed as soon as practicable after a caesarean. Tweetable Full maternal oral feeding should commence as soon as practicable after an uncomplicated caesarean section. Tweetable Full maternal oral feeding should commence as soon as practicable after an uncomplicated caesarean section.</description><subject>Caesarean</subject><subject>Cesarean section</subject><subject>Childbirth &amp; labor</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Eating behavior</subject><subject>maternal feeding</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>patient satisfaction</subject><subject>randomised trial</subject><subject>vomiting</subject><issn>1470-0328</issn><issn>1471-0528</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkbtOAzEQRS0EIrxqOmSJhmbB9q5jLx1EPIVEA7XltWdho30EO0uUjk_gG_kSJglQ0IAL2xqfez2aS8g-Z8cc1wnPFE-YFPqYZ4LzNbL1U1lf3lnCUqEHZDvGMWN8KFi6SQZCZVxzlW-R9qZpwFd2CtR1zcQG8HRWTZ9p1368vXtobOtpg8-htTUt-xo3QEH7RG2JVTqpbduiyFmIqLYt9VBXrxDmp9TSgPKuqSIC01DZepdslLaOsPd17pDHy4uH0XVyd391Mzq7S5zELpNClKniXktgqZN2WIhC6DLP2VAJloMsVe41k8ymmkFWeKdyUFnmfJaXTimd7pCjle8kdC89xKnBJhzU2Cx0fTRcyzzTmrP0H6jAX3GUCtHDX-i46xeDWRryoZRCMaROVpQLXYwBSjMJVWPD3HBmFqmZRUZmkZFZpoaKgy_fvsA0fvjvmBCQK2BW1TD_y8-c396vjD8Bb-2hKQ</recordid><startdate>201701</startdate><enddate>201701</enddate><creator>Tan, PC</creator><creator>Alzergany, MM</creator><creator>Adlan, A‐S</creator><creator>Noor Azmi, MA</creator><creator>Omar, SZ</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201701</creationdate><title>Immediate compared with on‐demand maternal full feeding after planned caesarean delivery: a randomised trial</title><author>Tan, PC ; Alzergany, MM ; Adlan, A‐S ; Noor Azmi, MA ; Omar, SZ</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5001-b2f371d85e03c5a6b2b28f99067209e5f79d8050a380e4bdc79e744cd49fc7783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Caesarean</topic><topic>Cesarean section</topic><topic>Childbirth &amp; labor</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Eating behavior</topic><topic>maternal feeding</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>patient satisfaction</topic><topic>randomised trial</topic><topic>vomiting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tan, PC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alzergany, MM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adlan, A‐S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noor Azmi, MA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omar, SZ</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tan, PC</au><au>Alzergany, MM</au><au>Adlan, A‐S</au><au>Noor Azmi, MA</au><au>Omar, SZ</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Immediate compared with on‐demand maternal full feeding after planned caesarean delivery: a randomised trial</atitle><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle><addtitle>BJOG</addtitle><date>2017-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>124</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>123</spage><epage>131</epage><pages>123-131</pages><issn>1470-0328</issn><eissn>1471-0528</eissn><coden>BIOGFQ</coden><abstract>Objective To evaluate immediate compared with on‐demand full maternal oral feeding after caesarean delivery Study design A randomised trial. Setting Obstetric unit of a university hospital in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Population Women admitted for a planned caesarean under spinal anaesthesia. Methods Participants were randomised to a sandwich meal served immediately on return to the ward or on‐demand. Main outcome measures Primary outcomes were patient satisfaction VAS (visual analog scale of 100 mm) on the feeding regimen and vomiting at 24 hours. Results 453 women were initially enrolled, 395 were randomised and available for analysis. Median (full range) patient satisfaction VAS scores were 82 (15–100) versus 84 (0–100) mm, P = 0.88 and vomiting rates were 1/197 (0.5%) versus 2/198 (1.0%), P &gt; 0.99 for immediate compared with on‐demand feeding, respectively. The immediate versus on‐demand arms first ate at a median of 105 (35–210) versus 165 (45–385) minutes, P &lt; 0.001, had second meal at 5.3 (1.2–15.5) versus 5.8 (2.2–29.7), P &lt; 0.001, flatus passage at 9.5 (3.1–29.0) versus 10.3 (2.8–24.6), P = 0.023 hours post‐caesarean and opiate analgesia use was 10/197 (5.1%) versus 23/198 (11.6%), P = 0.028, RR 0.4 (95% CI 0.2–0.9), NNTb 16 (95% CI 8–89). The median visual numerical rating scale (0–10 scale) for nausea and bloating at 8, 16 and 24 hours was similarly scored at zero in both arms. Other outcomes were similar. Conclusion Immediate full feeding has some advantage over on‐demand feeding. Both regimens are tolerated well. Patients probably should be fed as soon as practicable after a caesarean. Tweetable Full maternal oral feeding should commence as soon as practicable after an uncomplicated caesarean section. Tweetable Full maternal oral feeding should commence as soon as practicable after an uncomplicated caesarean section.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>27418179</pmid><doi>10.1111/1471-0528.14211</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1470-0328
ispartof BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2017-01, Vol.124 (1), p.123-131
issn 1470-0328
1471-0528
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859488103
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Caesarean
Cesarean section
Childbirth & labor
Diet
Eating behavior
maternal feeding
Mothers
patient satisfaction
randomised trial
vomiting
title Immediate compared with on‐demand maternal full feeding after planned caesarean delivery: a randomised trial
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T04%3A04%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Immediate%20compared%20with%20on%E2%80%90demand%20maternal%20full%20feeding%20after%20planned%20caesarean%20delivery:%20a%20randomised%20trial&rft.jtitle=BJOG%20:%20an%20international%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynaecology&rft.au=Tan,%20PC&rft.date=2017-01&rft.volume=124&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=123&rft.epage=131&rft.pages=123-131&rft.issn=1470-0328&rft.eissn=1471-0528&rft.coden=BIOGFQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1471-0528.14211&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1859488103%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5001-b2f371d85e03c5a6b2b28f99067209e5f79d8050a380e4bdc79e744cd49fc7783%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1851655270&rft_id=info:pmid/27418179&rfr_iscdi=true