Improvement evident but still necessary in clinical practice guideline quality: a systematic review

Abstract Objective To review the quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) from a wide range of health care topics and report any changes seen since 1992. Study Design and Setting A literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science Core Collection, and BIOSIS was conducted in London, Ontario...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical epidemiology 2017-01, Vol.81, p.13-21
Main Authors: Armstrong, James Jacob, Goldfarb, Alexander M, Instrum, Ryan S, MacDermid, Joy C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
AGREE
Appraisal
Clinical
Clinical medicine
Clinical Protocols - standards
Collaboration
Editorials
Epidemiology
Guidelines
Humans
Internal Medicine
Medicine
Methods
Policy
Practice Guidelines as Topic - standards
Professional Practice - standards
Quality
Quality of Health Care - standards
Stakeholders
Standard deviation
Trends
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Objective To review the quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) from a wide range of health care topics and report any changes seen since 1992. Study Design and Setting A literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science Core Collection, and BIOSIS was conducted in London, Ontario, Canada. Publications were screened to identify those assessing the quality of CPGs using the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. Data were gathered regarding year of publication, institution type, health topic, country of origin, domain scores, and final recommendation. Results Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. AGREE II scores from 415 individual CPGs published between 1992 and 2014 were obtained. Domain scores increased significantly over time, and the proportion of guidelines being recommended based on AGREE II assessment was significantly greater after 2010. Domain scores in Applicability and Editorial independence had no significant effect on a CPG's final recommendation, whereas other domains had a significant effect. Finally, international development groups produced CPGs with significantly higher scores. Conclusion This review found a steady improvement in CPG quality over time. This is particularly evident in guidelines published after 2010. However, certain domains that are integral to the methodological quality of CPGs remain unsatisfactorily low.
ISSN:0895-4356
1878-5921
DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.08.005