Revisiting Parole Decision Making: Testing for the Punitive Hypothesis in a Large U.S. Jurisdiction

The decision to grant conditional release from prison (aka the parole decision) has been largely neglected in the contemporary criminological literature, despite its critical implications. The current study, conducted in Pennsylvania, United States, tests for punitive themes in parole decision makin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology 2018-04, Vol.62 (5), p.1357-1383
Main Author: Rely, Vîlcică E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Candidates
Conditional release
Criminology
Decision makers
Decision making
Denial
Ex-convicts
Jurisdiction
Parole
Parole & probation
Parole officers
Prisoners
Punishment
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The decision to grant conditional release from prison (aka the parole decision) has been largely neglected in the contemporary criminological literature, despite its critical implications. The current study, conducted in Pennsylvania, United States, tests for punitive themes in parole decision making by examining the impact of several measures reflective of punishment satisfaction on the decision to grant release to eligible parole candidates. The results indicate that the amount of time served in relation to the original punishment does not predict parole decisions but the nature of the original offense does. Moreover, inmates eligible for parole have to experience at least one parole denial to increase their chances of release, suggesting that parole decision makers use the parole process as a punitive means. The implications of the findings are discussed.
ISSN:0306-624X
1552-6933
DOI:10.1177/0306624X16668512