Loading…
Perioperative Feedback in Surgical Training: A Systematic Review
Abstract Background Changes in surgical training have raised concerns about residents’ operative exposure and preparedness for independent practice. One way of addressing this concern is by optimizing teaching and feedback in the operating room (OR). The objective of this study was to perform a syst...
Saved in:
Published in: | The American journal of surgery 2017-07, Vol.214 (1), p.117-126 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-8de479d3141be5db4be4bcacb227fc89999316eacf1e669a8c8dce054c5eda963 |
container_end_page | 126 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 117 |
container_title | The American journal of surgery |
container_volume | 214 |
creator | McKendy, Katherine M Watanabe, Yusuke Lee, Lawrence Bilgic, Elif Enani, Ghada Feldman, Liane S Fried, Gerald M Vassiliou, Melina C |
description | Abstract Background Changes in surgical training have raised concerns about residents’ operative exposure and preparedness for independent practice. One way of addressing this concern is by optimizing teaching and feedback in the operating room (OR). The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review on perioperative teaching and feedback. Methods A systematic literature search identified articles from 1994-2014 that addressed teaching, feedback, guidance, or debriefing in the perioperative period. Data was extracted according to ENTREQ guidelines, and a qualitative analysis was performed. Results Thematic analysis of the 26 included studies identified four major topics. Observation of teaching behaviors in the OR described current teaching practices. Identification of effective teaching strategies analyzed teaching behaviors, differentiating positive and negative teaching strategies. Perceptions of teaching behaviors described resident and attending satisfaction with teaching in the OR. Finally models for delivering structured feedback cited examples of feedback strategies and measured their effectiveness. Conclusions This study provides an overview of perioperative teaching and feedback for surgical trainees and identifies a need for improved quality and quantity of structured feedback. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.12.014 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1861425245</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S000296101630530X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1911190519</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-8de479d3141be5db4be4bcacb227fc89999316eacf1e669a8c8dce054c5eda963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV9rFDEUxYNY7Fr9CMqAL32ZMTfJZBMftKW0WigobgXfQia5WzKdP2syU9lv3yy7KvTFvIQL55zc_A4hb4BWQEG-byvbt2mOdxXLYwWsoiCekQWopS5BKf6cLCilrNQS6DF5mVKbRwDBX5BjpqjKNrogZ98whnGD0U7hAYsrRN9Yd1-EoVjl8OBsV9xGG4Yw3H0ozovVNk3YZ7ErvuNDwN-vyNHadglfH-4T8uPq8vbiS3nz9fP1xflN6biWU6k8iqX2HAQ0WPtGNCgaZ13D2HLtlM6Hg0Tr1oBSaquc8g5pLVyN3mrJT8jpPncTx18zpsn0ITnsOjvgOCcDSoJgNRN1lr57Im3HOQ55OwMaADStQWdVvVe5OKYUcW02MfQ2bg1Qs0NsWnNAbHaIDTCTEWff20P63PTo_7r-MM2CT3sBZhwZUTTJBRwc-hDRTcaP4b9PfHyS4LrcQO7iHreY_v3GpGwwq13Pu5pBclpz-pM_AjILo7c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1911190519</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perioperative Feedback in Surgical Training: A Systematic Review</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>McKendy, Katherine M ; Watanabe, Yusuke ; Lee, Lawrence ; Bilgic, Elif ; Enani, Ghada ; Feldman, Liane S ; Fried, Gerald M ; Vassiliou, Melina C</creator><creatorcontrib>McKendy, Katherine M ; Watanabe, Yusuke ; Lee, Lawrence ; Bilgic, Elif ; Enani, Ghada ; Feldman, Liane S ; Fried, Gerald M ; Vassiliou, Melina C</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Changes in surgical training have raised concerns about residents’ operative exposure and preparedness for independent practice. One way of addressing this concern is by optimizing teaching and feedback in the operating room (OR). The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review on perioperative teaching and feedback. Methods A systematic literature search identified articles from 1994-2014 that addressed teaching, feedback, guidance, or debriefing in the perioperative period. Data was extracted according to ENTREQ guidelines, and a qualitative analysis was performed. Results Thematic analysis of the 26 included studies identified four major topics. Observation of teaching behaviors in the OR described current teaching practices. Identification of effective teaching strategies analyzed teaching behaviors, differentiating positive and negative teaching strategies. Perceptions of teaching behaviors described resident and attending satisfaction with teaching in the OR. Finally models for delivering structured feedback cited examples of feedback strategies and measured their effectiveness. Conclusions This study provides an overview of perioperative teaching and feedback for surgical trainees and identifies a need for improved quality and quantity of structured feedback.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.12.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28082010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Education ; Feedback ; Formative feedback ; General Surgery - education ; Humans ; Internship and Residency ; Laparoscopy ; Operating Rooms ; Perioperative Period ; Perioperative teaching ; Qualitative analysis ; Skills ; Structured feedback ; Studies ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Surgical education ; Systematic review ; Teaching ; Teaching methods ; Training</subject><ispartof>The American journal of surgery, 2017-07, Vol.214 (1), p.117-126</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Jul 1, 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-8de479d3141be5db4be4bcacb227fc89999316eacf1e669a8c8dce054c5eda963</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9705-3683</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28082010$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McKendy, Katherine M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Yusuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilgic, Elif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enani, Ghada</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feldman, Liane S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fried, Gerald M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vassiliou, Melina C</creatorcontrib><title>Perioperative Feedback in Surgical Training: A Systematic Review</title><title>The American journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Changes in surgical training have raised concerns about residents’ operative exposure and preparedness for independent practice. One way of addressing this concern is by optimizing teaching and feedback in the operating room (OR). The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review on perioperative teaching and feedback. Methods A systematic literature search identified articles from 1994-2014 that addressed teaching, feedback, guidance, or debriefing in the perioperative period. Data was extracted according to ENTREQ guidelines, and a qualitative analysis was performed. Results Thematic analysis of the 26 included studies identified four major topics. Observation of teaching behaviors in the OR described current teaching practices. Identification of effective teaching strategies analyzed teaching behaviors, differentiating positive and negative teaching strategies. Perceptions of teaching behaviors described resident and attending satisfaction with teaching in the OR. Finally models for delivering structured feedback cited examples of feedback strategies and measured their effectiveness. Conclusions This study provides an overview of perioperative teaching and feedback for surgical trainees and identifies a need for improved quality and quantity of structured feedback.</description><subject>Education</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Formative feedback</subject><subject>General Surgery - education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internship and Residency</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Operating Rooms</subject><subject>Perioperative Period</subject><subject>Perioperative teaching</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Structured feedback</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical education</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkV9rFDEUxYNY7Fr9CMqAL32ZMTfJZBMftKW0WigobgXfQia5WzKdP2syU9lv3yy7KvTFvIQL55zc_A4hb4BWQEG-byvbt2mOdxXLYwWsoiCekQWopS5BKf6cLCilrNQS6DF5mVKbRwDBX5BjpqjKNrogZ98whnGD0U7hAYsrRN9Yd1-EoVjl8OBsV9xGG4Yw3H0ozovVNk3YZ7ErvuNDwN-vyNHadglfH-4T8uPq8vbiS3nz9fP1xflN6biWU6k8iqX2HAQ0WPtGNCgaZ13D2HLtlM6Hg0Tr1oBSaquc8g5pLVyN3mrJT8jpPncTx18zpsn0ITnsOjvgOCcDSoJgNRN1lr57Im3HOQ55OwMaADStQWdVvVe5OKYUcW02MfQ2bg1Qs0NsWnNAbHaIDTCTEWff20P63PTo_7r-MM2CT3sBZhwZUTTJBRwc-hDRTcaP4b9PfHyS4LrcQO7iHreY_v3GpGwwq13Pu5pBclpz-pM_AjILo7c</recordid><startdate>20170701</startdate><enddate>20170701</enddate><creator>McKendy, Katherine M</creator><creator>Watanabe, Yusuke</creator><creator>Lee, Lawrence</creator><creator>Bilgic, Elif</creator><creator>Enani, Ghada</creator><creator>Feldman, Liane S</creator><creator>Fried, Gerald M</creator><creator>Vassiliou, Melina C</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9705-3683</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170701</creationdate><title>Perioperative Feedback in Surgical Training: A Systematic Review</title><author>McKendy, Katherine M ; Watanabe, Yusuke ; Lee, Lawrence ; Bilgic, Elif ; Enani, Ghada ; Feldman, Liane S ; Fried, Gerald M ; Vassiliou, Melina C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-8de479d3141be5db4be4bcacb227fc89999316eacf1e669a8c8dce054c5eda963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Education</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Formative feedback</topic><topic>General Surgery - education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internship and Residency</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Operating Rooms</topic><topic>Perioperative Period</topic><topic>Perioperative teaching</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Structured feedback</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical education</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McKendy, Katherine M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Yusuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilgic, Elif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enani, Ghada</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feldman, Liane S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fried, Gerald M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vassiliou, Melina C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health & Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McKendy, Katherine M</au><au>Watanabe, Yusuke</au><au>Lee, Lawrence</au><au>Bilgic, Elif</au><au>Enani, Ghada</au><au>Feldman, Liane S</au><au>Fried, Gerald M</au><au>Vassiliou, Melina C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perioperative Feedback in Surgical Training: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><date>2017-07-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>214</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>117</spage><epage>126</epage><pages>117-126</pages><issn>0002-9610</issn><eissn>1879-1883</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Changes in surgical training have raised concerns about residents’ operative exposure and preparedness for independent practice. One way of addressing this concern is by optimizing teaching and feedback in the operating room (OR). The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review on perioperative teaching and feedback. Methods A systematic literature search identified articles from 1994-2014 that addressed teaching, feedback, guidance, or debriefing in the perioperative period. Data was extracted according to ENTREQ guidelines, and a qualitative analysis was performed. Results Thematic analysis of the 26 included studies identified four major topics. Observation of teaching behaviors in the OR described current teaching practices. Identification of effective teaching strategies analyzed teaching behaviors, differentiating positive and negative teaching strategies. Perceptions of teaching behaviors described resident and attending satisfaction with teaching in the OR. Finally models for delivering structured feedback cited examples of feedback strategies and measured their effectiveness. Conclusions This study provides an overview of perioperative teaching and feedback for surgical trainees and identifies a need for improved quality and quantity of structured feedback.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28082010</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.12.014</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9705-3683</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9610 |
ispartof | The American journal of surgery, 2017-07, Vol.214 (1), p.117-126 |
issn | 0002-9610 1879-1883 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1861425245 |
source | Elsevier |
subjects | Education Feedback Formative feedback General Surgery - education Humans Internship and Residency Laparoscopy Operating Rooms Perioperative Period Perioperative teaching Qualitative analysis Skills Structured feedback Studies Surgeons Surgery Surgical education Systematic review Teaching Teaching methods Training |
title | Perioperative Feedback in Surgical Training: A Systematic Review |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T05%3A59%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perioperative%20Feedback%20in%20Surgical%20Training:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=McKendy,%20Katherine%20M&rft.date=2017-07-01&rft.volume=214&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=117&rft.epage=126&rft.pages=117-126&rft.issn=0002-9610&rft.eissn=1879-1883&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.12.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1911190519%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-8de479d3141be5db4be4bcacb227fc89999316eacf1e669a8c8dce054c5eda963%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1911190519&rft_id=info:pmid/28082010&rfr_iscdi=true |