Loading…

Cap cuff–assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for adenoma detection: a randomized back-to-back study

Background and Aims EndoCuff is a disposable device applied to standard colonoscopes to improve mucosal visualization. Randomized parallel trials have shown that EndoCuff increases the adenoma detection rate (ADR). The primary aim of this study was to compare the ADR between EndoCuff-assisted colono...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2018-01, Vol.87 (1), p.232-240
Main Authors: De Palma, Giovanni D., MD, Giglio, Mariano C., MD, Bruzzese, Dario, PhD, Gennarelli, Nicola, MD, Maione, Francesco, MD, Siciliano, Saverio, MD, Manzo, Benedetta, MD, Cassese, Gianluca, MD, Luglio, Gaetano, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-e2a8cad9a8483d4048b0d17ae0b55342539acbb82fded2a9a68bc3d6d961902f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-e2a8cad9a8483d4048b0d17ae0b55342539acbb82fded2a9a68bc3d6d961902f3
container_end_page 240
container_issue 1
container_start_page 232
container_title Gastrointestinal endoscopy
container_volume 87
creator De Palma, Giovanni D., MD
Giglio, Mariano C., MD
Bruzzese, Dario, PhD
Gennarelli, Nicola, MD
Maione, Francesco, MD
Siciliano, Saverio, MD
Manzo, Benedetta, MD
Cassese, Gianluca, MD
Luglio, Gaetano, MD
description Background and Aims EndoCuff is a disposable device applied to standard colonoscopes to improve mucosal visualization. Randomized parallel trials have shown that EndoCuff increases the adenoma detection rate (ADR). The primary aim of this study was to compare the ADR between EndoCuff-assisted colonoscopies (EAC) and standard colonoscopies within a randomized back-to-back trial. Methods This was a single-center randomized crossover study (NCT02374515) involving adult patients undergoing screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopy. Participants received back-to-back standard colonoscopies and EACs in a random order, performed by the same endoscopist. All polyps were excised, but only those proven at histology to be adenomas were considered for analysis. Results From February 2015 to March 2016, a total of 288 patients were enrolled, and 274 were included in the per-protocol analysis. Compared with standard colonoscopies, EACs increased the ADR (29.6% vs 26.3%; P  < .01) and the number of diagnosed adenomas (176 vs 129; P  < .01), particularly in the left (73 vs 46; P  < .01) and right sides of the colon (83 vs 63; P  < .01). EAC increased the detection of adenomas 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.gie.2016.12.027
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1861436844</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016510717300044</els_id><sourcerecordid>1861436844</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-e2a8cad9a8483d4048b0d17ae0b55342539acbb82fded2a9a68bc3d6d961902f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2K1UAQhRtRnOvoA7iRLN0kdnX-OgqCXPyDARfquql0V6TvJOlrVzJwXfkOvqFPYoc7CrpwVQV1zoH6jhCPQRYgoXl2KL54KlRaC1CFVO0dsQPZtXnTtt1dsZPpktcg2wvxgPkgpdSqhPviQum0AdQ7Efd4zOw6DD-__0Bmzwu5zIYxzIFtOJ6yG4q8csYLzg7j37chxAwdzWHCzNFCdvFhfp5hFpM4TP5byurRXudLyLeZUlZ3eijuDTgyPbqdl-Lzm9ef9u_yqw9v3-9fXeW2knrJSaG26DrUlS5dJSvdSwctkuzruqxUXXZo-16rwZFT2GGje1u6xnUNdFIN5aV4es49xvB1JV7M5NnSOOJMYWUDuoGqbHRVJSmcpTYG5kiDOUY_YTwZkGZDbQ4moTYbagPKJNTJ8-Q2fu0ncn8cv9kmwYuzgNKTN56iYetptuR8TKiMC_6_8S__cdvRz97ieE0n4kNY45zoGTCcDObj1vVWNbRl6jn99AvdWKbA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1861436844</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cap cuff–assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for adenoma detection: a randomized back-to-back study</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>De Palma, Giovanni D., MD ; Giglio, Mariano C., MD ; Bruzzese, Dario, PhD ; Gennarelli, Nicola, MD ; Maione, Francesco, MD ; Siciliano, Saverio, MD ; Manzo, Benedetta, MD ; Cassese, Gianluca, MD ; Luglio, Gaetano, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>De Palma, Giovanni D., MD ; Giglio, Mariano C., MD ; Bruzzese, Dario, PhD ; Gennarelli, Nicola, MD ; Maione, Francesco, MD ; Siciliano, Saverio, MD ; Manzo, Benedetta, MD ; Cassese, Gianluca, MD ; Luglio, Gaetano, MD</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Background and Aims EndoCuff is a disposable device applied to standard colonoscopes to improve mucosal visualization. Randomized parallel trials have shown that EndoCuff increases the adenoma detection rate (ADR). The primary aim of this study was to compare the ADR between EndoCuff-assisted colonoscopies (EAC) and standard colonoscopies within a randomized back-to-back trial. Methods This was a single-center randomized crossover study (NCT02374515) involving adult patients undergoing screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopy. Participants received back-to-back standard colonoscopies and EACs in a random order, performed by the same endoscopist. All polyps were excised, but only those proven at histology to be adenomas were considered for analysis. Results From February 2015 to March 2016, a total of 288 patients were enrolled, and 274 were included in the per-protocol analysis. Compared with standard colonoscopies, EACs increased the ADR (29.6% vs 26.3%; P  < .01) and the number of diagnosed adenomas (176 vs 129; P  < .01), particularly in the left (73 vs 46; P  < .01) and right sides of the colon (83 vs 63; P  < .01). EAC increased the detection of adenomas <5 mm (129 vs 84; P  < .01), but no difference was found with regard to larger lesions. In 7.3% of patients, findings of EndoCuff shortened the surveillance interval determined by standard colonoscopy findings. EndoCuff caused 7 mucosal erosions (2.5% of patients), requiring a mucosal adrenaline injection in 1 case. Conclusions The use of EndoCuff increases the number of identified adenomas, primarily small adenomas in the left and right sides of the colon. This increases the ADR and allows a better definition of the surveillance program. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02374515 .)]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-5107</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6779</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.12.027</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28082115</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</subject><ispartof>Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2018-01, Vol.87 (1), p.232-240</ispartof><rights>American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>2018 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-e2a8cad9a8483d4048b0d17ae0b55342539acbb82fded2a9a68bc3d6d961902f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-e2a8cad9a8483d4048b0d17ae0b55342539acbb82fded2a9a68bc3d6d961902f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9222-5885 ; 0000-0001-7474-7180 ; 0000-0001-9911-4646</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28082115$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Palma, Giovanni D., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giglio, Mariano C., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruzzese, Dario, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gennarelli, Nicola, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maione, Francesco, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siciliano, Saverio, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manzo, Benedetta, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassese, Gianluca, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luglio, Gaetano, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Cap cuff–assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for adenoma detection: a randomized back-to-back study</title><title>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</title><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Background and Aims EndoCuff is a disposable device applied to standard colonoscopes to improve mucosal visualization. Randomized parallel trials have shown that EndoCuff increases the adenoma detection rate (ADR). The primary aim of this study was to compare the ADR between EndoCuff-assisted colonoscopies (EAC) and standard colonoscopies within a randomized back-to-back trial. Methods This was a single-center randomized crossover study (NCT02374515) involving adult patients undergoing screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopy. Participants received back-to-back standard colonoscopies and EACs in a random order, performed by the same endoscopist. All polyps were excised, but only those proven at histology to be adenomas were considered for analysis. Results From February 2015 to March 2016, a total of 288 patients were enrolled, and 274 were included in the per-protocol analysis. Compared with standard colonoscopies, EACs increased the ADR (29.6% vs 26.3%; P  < .01) and the number of diagnosed adenomas (176 vs 129; P  < .01), particularly in the left (73 vs 46; P  < .01) and right sides of the colon (83 vs 63; P  < .01). EAC increased the detection of adenomas <5 mm (129 vs 84; P  < .01), but no difference was found with regard to larger lesions. In 7.3% of patients, findings of EndoCuff shortened the surveillance interval determined by standard colonoscopy findings. EndoCuff caused 7 mucosal erosions (2.5% of patients), requiring a mucosal adrenaline injection in 1 case. Conclusions The use of EndoCuff increases the number of identified adenomas, primarily small adenomas in the left and right sides of the colon. This increases the ADR and allows a better definition of the surveillance program. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02374515 .)]]></description><subject>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</subject><issn>0016-5107</issn><issn>1097-6779</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc2K1UAQhRtRnOvoA7iRLN0kdnX-OgqCXPyDARfquql0V6TvJOlrVzJwXfkOvqFPYoc7CrpwVQV1zoH6jhCPQRYgoXl2KL54KlRaC1CFVO0dsQPZtXnTtt1dsZPpktcg2wvxgPkgpdSqhPviQum0AdQ7Efd4zOw6DD-__0Bmzwu5zIYxzIFtOJ6yG4q8csYLzg7j37chxAwdzWHCzNFCdvFhfp5hFpM4TP5byurRXudLyLeZUlZ3eijuDTgyPbqdl-Lzm9ef9u_yqw9v3-9fXeW2knrJSaG26DrUlS5dJSvdSwctkuzruqxUXXZo-16rwZFT2GGje1u6xnUNdFIN5aV4es49xvB1JV7M5NnSOOJMYWUDuoGqbHRVJSmcpTYG5kiDOUY_YTwZkGZDbQ4moTYbagPKJNTJ8-Q2fu0ncn8cv9kmwYuzgNKTN56iYetptuR8TKiMC_6_8S__cdvRz97ieE0n4kNY45zoGTCcDObj1vVWNbRl6jn99AvdWKbA</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>De Palma, Giovanni D., MD</creator><creator>Giglio, Mariano C., MD</creator><creator>Bruzzese, Dario, PhD</creator><creator>Gennarelli, Nicola, MD</creator><creator>Maione, Francesco, MD</creator><creator>Siciliano, Saverio, MD</creator><creator>Manzo, Benedetta, MD</creator><creator>Cassese, Gianluca, MD</creator><creator>Luglio, Gaetano, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9222-5885</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7474-7180</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9911-4646</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Cap cuff–assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for adenoma detection: a randomized back-to-back study</title><author>De Palma, Giovanni D., MD ; Giglio, Mariano C., MD ; Bruzzese, Dario, PhD ; Gennarelli, Nicola, MD ; Maione, Francesco, MD ; Siciliano, Saverio, MD ; Manzo, Benedetta, MD ; Cassese, Gianluca, MD ; Luglio, Gaetano, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-e2a8cad9a8483d4048b0d17ae0b55342539acbb82fded2a9a68bc3d6d961902f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Palma, Giovanni D., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giglio, Mariano C., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruzzese, Dario, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gennarelli, Nicola, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maione, Francesco, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siciliano, Saverio, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manzo, Benedetta, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassese, Gianluca, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luglio, Gaetano, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Palma, Giovanni D., MD</au><au>Giglio, Mariano C., MD</au><au>Bruzzese, Dario, PhD</au><au>Gennarelli, Nicola, MD</au><au>Maione, Francesco, MD</au><au>Siciliano, Saverio, MD</au><au>Manzo, Benedetta, MD</au><au>Cassese, Gianluca, MD</au><au>Luglio, Gaetano, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cap cuff–assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for adenoma detection: a randomized back-to-back study</atitle><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>232</spage><epage>240</epage><pages>232-240</pages><issn>0016-5107</issn><eissn>1097-6779</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Background and Aims EndoCuff is a disposable device applied to standard colonoscopes to improve mucosal visualization. Randomized parallel trials have shown that EndoCuff increases the adenoma detection rate (ADR). The primary aim of this study was to compare the ADR between EndoCuff-assisted colonoscopies (EAC) and standard colonoscopies within a randomized back-to-back trial. Methods This was a single-center randomized crossover study (NCT02374515) involving adult patients undergoing screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopy. Participants received back-to-back standard colonoscopies and EACs in a random order, performed by the same endoscopist. All polyps were excised, but only those proven at histology to be adenomas were considered for analysis. Results From February 2015 to March 2016, a total of 288 patients were enrolled, and 274 were included in the per-protocol analysis. Compared with standard colonoscopies, EACs increased the ADR (29.6% vs 26.3%; P  < .01) and the number of diagnosed adenomas (176 vs 129; P  < .01), particularly in the left (73 vs 46; P  < .01) and right sides of the colon (83 vs 63; P  < .01). EAC increased the detection of adenomas <5 mm (129 vs 84; P  < .01), but no difference was found with regard to larger lesions. In 7.3% of patients, findings of EndoCuff shortened the surveillance interval determined by standard colonoscopy findings. EndoCuff caused 7 mucosal erosions (2.5% of patients), requiring a mucosal adrenaline injection in 1 case. Conclusions The use of EndoCuff increases the number of identified adenomas, primarily small adenomas in the left and right sides of the colon. This increases the ADR and allows a better definition of the surveillance program. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02374515 .)]]></abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28082115</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gie.2016.12.027</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9222-5885</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7474-7180</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9911-4646</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-5107
ispartof Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2018-01, Vol.87 (1), p.232-240
issn 0016-5107
1097-6779
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1861436844
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Gastroenterology and Hepatology
title Cap cuff–assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for adenoma detection: a randomized back-to-back study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T02%3A52%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cap%20cuff%E2%80%93assisted%20colonoscopy%20versus%20standard%20colonoscopy%20for%20adenoma%20detection:%20a%20randomized%20back-to-back%20study&rft.jtitle=Gastrointestinal%20endoscopy&rft.au=De%20Palma,%20Giovanni%20D.,%20MD&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=232&rft.epage=240&rft.pages=232-240&rft.issn=0016-5107&rft.eissn=1097-6779&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gie.2016.12.027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1861436844%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-e2a8cad9a8483d4048b0d17ae0b55342539acbb82fded2a9a68bc3d6d961902f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1861436844&rft_id=info:pmid/28082115&rfr_iscdi=true