Aging and risky decision-making: New ERP evidence from the Iowa Gambling Task

• Published in: Neuroscience letters 2017-02, Vol.640, p.93-98
• Main Authors: Di Rosa, Elisa, Mapelli, Daniela, Arcara, Giorgio, Amodio, Piero, Tamburin, Stefano, Schiff, Sami
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aging; Aging - physiology; Aging - psychology; Brain - physiopathology; Brain Mapping; Decision Making; ERP; Evoked Potentials; Feedback; Feedback processing; Female; Gambling - physiopathology; Gambling - psychology; Humans; IGT; Male; Middle Aged; Young Adult
• ISSN: 0304-3940; 1872-7972
• DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.01.021

•We recorded event-related brain potentials (ERP) during Iowa Gambling Task in young and older adults.•Behavioral results confirmed the presence of an age-related decline in risky decision-making.•ERP results show that age is related to significant changes in feedback processing.•P3 amplitude after negative feedback is significantly reduced in older adults.•Findings suggest that aging is associated to a declined capacity to shift the attention from positive to negative information. Several pieces of evidence have highlighted the presence of an age-related decline in risky decision-making (DM), but the reason of this decline is still unclear. The aim of the present study was to investigate the neural correlates of feedback processing in risky DM. Twenty-one younger (age 50 years) adults were tested with the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) during Event Related Potentials (ERP) recording. The analysis was focused on the feedback-related negativity (FRN) and P3, two ERP components that represent different stages of feedback processing. Behavioral results revealed that older adults, despite showing a significant learning trend, completed the IGT with a gain of a smaller amount of money compared to the younger ones. ERP results revealed that while the FRN response was comparable in the two groups, the P3 amplitude was significantly reduced after negative feedback in older adults, compared with the younger ones. Furthermore, the difference in the P3 amplitude evoked by positive and negative feedback was significantly correlated with age. Hence, the present findings suggest that older adults seem to be less willing to shift attention from positive to negative information, and that this relevant change in the later stages of feedback processing could be the cause of a poor performance in risky DM contexts.