Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional imaging systems in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a retrospective cohort study

To compare the perioperative, functional and oncologic outcomes of patients with prostate cancer receiving laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) using three-dimensional (3D) versus two-dimensional (2D) imaging systems. From February, 2014 to January 2016, 72 consecutive patients with clinically l...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University 2017-01, Vol.37 (1), p.1-5
Main Authors: Tang, Kai-Qiang, Pang, Shi-Yu, Bao, Ji-Ming, Lei, Cheng-Yong, Tan, Wan-Long
Format: Article
Language:Chinese
Subjects:
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional - statistics & numerical data
Laparoscopy - methods
Male
Prostatectomy - methods
Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To compare the perioperative, functional and oncologic outcomes of patients with prostate cancer receiving laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) using three-dimensional (3D) versus two-dimensional (2D) imaging systems. From February, 2014 to January 2016, 72 consecutive patients with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent LRP with 2D or 3D imaging systems performed by a single experienced surgeon. The baseline characteristics, perioperative data, and functional and oncologic outcomes of the patients were collected and analyzed. Thirty-six patients underwent 3D LRP and the other 36 patients underwent 2D LRP. Compared with 2D LRP group, 3D LRP group had a significantly shorter operative time (167 vs 218 min, P
ISSN:1673-4254