Simulated Critical Differences for Speech Reception Thresholds

Purpose: Critical differences state by how much 2 test results have to differ in order to be significantly different. Critical differences for discrimination scores have been available for several decades, but they do not exist for speech reception thresholds (SRTs). This study presents and discusse...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of speech, language, and hearing research language, and hearing research, 2017-01, Vol.60 (1), p.238-250
Main Authors: Pedersen, Ellen Raben, Juhl, Peter Møller
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Accuracy
Adult
Assistive Technology
Audiometry, Speech
Auditory Tests
Clinical medicine
Comparative Analysis
Computer Simulation
Differences
Discrimination (Psychology)
Female
Hearing aids
Humans
Intelligibility
Listening Comprehension Tests
Male
Methods
Monte Carlo Method
Monte Carlo Methods
Noise
Physiological research
Reception
Sentences
Simulation
Speech
Speech Perception
Speech Reception Threshold Test
Studies
Test Results
Young Adult
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose: Critical differences state by how much 2 test results have to differ in order to be significantly different. Critical differences for discrimination scores have been available for several decades, but they do not exist for speech reception thresholds (SRTs). This study presents and discusses how critical differences for SRTs can be estimated by Monte Carlo simulations. As an application of this method, critical differences are proposed for a 5-word sentences test (a matrix test) using 2 widely implemented adaptive test procedures. Method: For each procedure, simulations were performed for different parameters: the number of test sentences, the "j" factor, the distribution of the subjects' true SRTs, and the slope of the discrimination function. For 1 procedure and 1 parameter setting, simulation data are compared with results found by listening tests (experimental data). Results: The critical differences were found to depend on the parameters tested, including interactive effects. The critical differences found by simulation agree with data found experimentally. Conclusions: As the critical differences for SRTs rely on multiple parameters, they must be determined for each parameter setting individually. However, with knowledge of the test setup, rules of thumb can be derived.
ISSN:1092-4388
1558-9102
DOI:10.1044/2016_JSLHR-H-15-0445