Loading…

Examination of the Correlation Between Foot Morphology Measurements Using Pedography and Radiographic Measurements

Abstract Pedography provides excellent visualization of the footprint. However, the correlation between the footprint images and radiographic measures has not been thoroughly evaluated. Therefore, the objectives of our study were to examine the correlation between the pedography-based measures of fo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of foot and ankle surgery 2017-03, Vol.56 (2), p.298-303
Main Authors: Inui, Kentaro, MD, Ikoma, Kazuya, MD, PhD, Imai, Kan, MD, PhD, Ohashi, Suzuyo, MD, PhD, Maki, Masahiro, MD, PhD, Kido, Masamitsu, MD, PhD, Hara, Yusuke, MD, PhD, Oka, Yoshinobu, MD, PhD, Fujiwara, Hiroyoshi, MD, PhD, Kubo, Toshikazu, MD, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Pedography provides excellent visualization of the footprint. However, the correlation between the footprint images and radiographic measures has not been thoroughly evaluated. Therefore, the objectives of our study were to examine the correlation between the pedography-based measures of foot morphology and radiographic measurements and to propose reference values for the diagnosis of flatfoot using footprint imaging. The plantar footprints of 100 right feet were photographed using a pedography standing platform. The sole and arch areas were measured to calculate the footprint index (FPI). The lateral talar–first metatarsal angle (LTM) and calcaneal pitch angle (CP) were measured on standing lateral radiographs, and the talonavicular coverage angle was measured on frontal radiographs. The Pearson moment correlation between the FPI and radiography-based measures was calculated. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was calculated using an LTM of
ISSN:1067-2516
1542-2224
DOI:10.1053/j.jfas.2016.10.020