Loading…

Organ Doses to Airline Passengers Screened by X-Ray Backscatter Imaging Systems

Advanced imaging technologies (AIT) are being developed for passenger airline transportation. They are designed to provide enhanced security benefits by identifying objects on passengers that would not be detected by methodologies now used for routine surveillance. X-ray backscatter imaging is one A...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Radiation research 2017-02, Vol.187 (2), p.229-240
Main Authors: Stepusin, Elliott J., Maynard, Matthew R., O'Reilly, Shannon E., Redzovic, Sadije, Bolch, Wesley E., Hintenlang, David E., Borak, Thomas B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b297t-27546b60b32512beb4252bd79cccb93d049cbfb36ccd9ebef87fd739292229883
container_end_page 240
container_issue 2
container_start_page 229
container_title Radiation research
container_volume 187
creator Stepusin, Elliott J.
Maynard, Matthew R.
O'Reilly, Shannon E.
Redzovic, Sadije
Bolch, Wesley E.
Hintenlang, David E.
Borak, Thomas B.
description Advanced imaging technologies (AIT) are being developed for passenger airline transportation. They are designed to provide enhanced security benefits by identifying objects on passengers that would not be detected by methodologies now used for routine surveillance. X-ray backscatter imaging is one AIT system being considered. Since this technology is based on scanning passengers with ionizing radiation, concern has been raised relating to the health risks associated with these exposures. Recommendations for standards of radiation safety have been proposed by the American National Standards Institute published in ANSI/HPS N43.17-2009. A Monte Carlo based methodology for estimating organ doses received from an X-ray backscatter AIT system is presented. Radiological properties of a reference scanner including beam intensity, geometry and energy spectra were modeled based on previous studies and physical measurements. These parameters were incorporated into a Monte Carlo source subroutine and validated with comparison of simulated versus measured data. One extension of this study was to calculate organ and effective dose on a wide range of potential passengers. Computational phantoms with realistic morphologies were used including adults of 5th, 25th, 50th, 75th and 95th percentile weight, children of 5th, 50th and 95th percentile weight, and the developing fetus of 15, 25, and 38 weeks after conception. Additional sensitivity studies were performed to evaluate effects of passenger positioning within the scanner, energy spectrum and beam geometry, as well as failure mode analyses. Results for routine operations yielded a maximum effective dose to the adult and pediatric passengers of 15 and 25 nSv per screen, respectively. The developing fetus received a maximum organ dose and whole body dose of 16 nGy and 8.5 nGy per screen, respectively. The sensitivity analyses indicated that variations in positioning, energy spectra, and beam geometry yielded a range of effective doses per screen that were an order of magnitude below the ANSI recommendation.
doi_str_mv 10.1667/RR4516.1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1861855450</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26428151</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26428151</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b297t-27546b60b32512beb4252bd79cccb93d049cbfb36ccd9ebef87fd739292229883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMoun6Af0DJSbxU89GkzVHXTxBWVgVvJUmnpeu21Uz30H9vl6p7EgaG4X14Bx5Cjjm74Fonl_N5rLi-4Ftkwo1MIxWzeJtMGJMySlSa7JF9xAUbbq7NLtkTKefDyAmZzUJpG3rTIiDtWnpVhWXVAH22iNCUEJC--ADQQE5dT9-jue3ptfUf6G3XQaCPtS2rpqQvPXZQ4yHZKewS4ehnH5C3u9vX6UP0NLt_nF49RU6YpItEomLtNHNSKC4cuFgo4fLEeO-dkTmLjXeFk9r73ICDIk2KPJFGGCGESVN5QM7H3s_Qfq0Au6yu0MNyaRtoV5jxVPNUqVixDepDixigyD5DVdvQZ5xla33ZqC_jA3r607pyNeR_4K-vATgZgQV2bdjkOh4QtS44G3NXtW0D_3_6Br4vfwM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1861855450</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Organ Doses to Airline Passengers Screened by X-Ray Backscatter Imaging Systems</title><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Stepusin, Elliott J. ; Maynard, Matthew R. ; O'Reilly, Shannon E. ; Redzovic, Sadije ; Bolch, Wesley E. ; Hintenlang, David E. ; Borak, Thomas B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stepusin, Elliott J. ; Maynard, Matthew R. ; O'Reilly, Shannon E. ; Redzovic, Sadije ; Bolch, Wesley E. ; Hintenlang, David E. ; Borak, Thomas B.</creatorcontrib><description>Advanced imaging technologies (AIT) are being developed for passenger airline transportation. They are designed to provide enhanced security benefits by identifying objects on passengers that would not be detected by methodologies now used for routine surveillance. X-ray backscatter imaging is one AIT system being considered. Since this technology is based on scanning passengers with ionizing radiation, concern has been raised relating to the health risks associated with these exposures. Recommendations for standards of radiation safety have been proposed by the American National Standards Institute published in ANSI/HPS N43.17-2009. A Monte Carlo based methodology for estimating organ doses received from an X-ray backscatter AIT system is presented. Radiological properties of a reference scanner including beam intensity, geometry and energy spectra were modeled based on previous studies and physical measurements. These parameters were incorporated into a Monte Carlo source subroutine and validated with comparison of simulated versus measured data. One extension of this study was to calculate organ and effective dose on a wide range of potential passengers. Computational phantoms with realistic morphologies were used including adults of 5th, 25th, 50th, 75th and 95th percentile weight, children of 5th, 50th and 95th percentile weight, and the developing fetus of 15, 25, and 38 weeks after conception. Additional sensitivity studies were performed to evaluate effects of passenger positioning within the scanner, energy spectrum and beam geometry, as well as failure mode analyses. Results for routine operations yielded a maximum effective dose to the adult and pediatric passengers of 15 and 25 nSv per screen, respectively. The developing fetus received a maximum organ dose and whole body dose of 16 nGy and 8.5 nGy per screen, respectively. The sensitivity analyses indicated that variations in positioning, energy spectra, and beam geometry yielded a range of effective doses per screen that were an order of magnitude below the ANSI recommendation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-7587</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5404</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1667/RR4516.1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28118113</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The Radiation Research Society</publisher><subject>Adult ; Air Travel ; Equipment Design ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiography - adverse effects ; Radiography - instrumentation ; Radiometry ; REGULAR ARTICLES ; Scattering, Radiation ; Space life sciences ; X-Rays - adverse effects</subject><ispartof>Radiation research, 2017-02, Vol.187 (2), p.229-240</ispartof><rights>2017 by Radiation Research Society.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Radiation Research Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b297t-27546b60b32512beb4252bd79cccb93d049cbfb36ccd9ebef87fd739292229883</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26428151$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26428151$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28118113$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stepusin, Elliott J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maynard, Matthew R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Reilly, Shannon E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redzovic, Sadije</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolch, Wesley E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hintenlang, David E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borak, Thomas B.</creatorcontrib><title>Organ Doses to Airline Passengers Screened by X-Ray Backscatter Imaging Systems</title><title>Radiation research</title><addtitle>Radiat Res</addtitle><description>Advanced imaging technologies (AIT) are being developed for passenger airline transportation. They are designed to provide enhanced security benefits by identifying objects on passengers that would not be detected by methodologies now used for routine surveillance. X-ray backscatter imaging is one AIT system being considered. Since this technology is based on scanning passengers with ionizing radiation, concern has been raised relating to the health risks associated with these exposures. Recommendations for standards of radiation safety have been proposed by the American National Standards Institute published in ANSI/HPS N43.17-2009. A Monte Carlo based methodology for estimating organ doses received from an X-ray backscatter AIT system is presented. Radiological properties of a reference scanner including beam intensity, geometry and energy spectra were modeled based on previous studies and physical measurements. These parameters were incorporated into a Monte Carlo source subroutine and validated with comparison of simulated versus measured data. One extension of this study was to calculate organ and effective dose on a wide range of potential passengers. Computational phantoms with realistic morphologies were used including adults of 5th, 25th, 50th, 75th and 95th percentile weight, children of 5th, 50th and 95th percentile weight, and the developing fetus of 15, 25, and 38 weeks after conception. Additional sensitivity studies were performed to evaluate effects of passenger positioning within the scanner, energy spectrum and beam geometry, as well as failure mode analyses. Results for routine operations yielded a maximum effective dose to the adult and pediatric passengers of 15 and 25 nSv per screen, respectively. The developing fetus received a maximum organ dose and whole body dose of 16 nGy and 8.5 nGy per screen, respectively. The sensitivity analyses indicated that variations in positioning, energy spectra, and beam geometry yielded a range of effective doses per screen that were an order of magnitude below the ANSI recommendation.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Air Travel</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiography - adverse effects</subject><subject>Radiography - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radiometry</subject><subject>REGULAR ARTICLES</subject><subject>Scattering, Radiation</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><subject>X-Rays - adverse effects</subject><issn>0033-7587</issn><issn>1938-5404</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMoun6Af0DJSbxU89GkzVHXTxBWVgVvJUmnpeu21Uz30H9vl6p7EgaG4X14Bx5Cjjm74Fonl_N5rLi-4Ftkwo1MIxWzeJtMGJMySlSa7JF9xAUbbq7NLtkTKefDyAmZzUJpG3rTIiDtWnpVhWXVAH22iNCUEJC--ADQQE5dT9-jue3ptfUf6G3XQaCPtS2rpqQvPXZQ4yHZKewS4ehnH5C3u9vX6UP0NLt_nF49RU6YpItEomLtNHNSKC4cuFgo4fLEeO-dkTmLjXeFk9r73ICDIk2KPJFGGCGESVN5QM7H3s_Qfq0Au6yu0MNyaRtoV5jxVPNUqVixDepDixigyD5DVdvQZ5xla33ZqC_jA3r607pyNeR_4K-vATgZgQV2bdjkOh4QtS44G3NXtW0D_3_6Br4vfwM</recordid><startdate>201702</startdate><enddate>201702</enddate><creator>Stepusin, Elliott J.</creator><creator>Maynard, Matthew R.</creator><creator>O'Reilly, Shannon E.</creator><creator>Redzovic, Sadije</creator><creator>Bolch, Wesley E.</creator><creator>Hintenlang, David E.</creator><creator>Borak, Thomas B.</creator><general>The Radiation Research Society</general><general>Radiation Research Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201702</creationdate><title>Organ Doses to Airline Passengers Screened by X-Ray Backscatter Imaging Systems</title><author>Stepusin, Elliott J. ; Maynard, Matthew R. ; O'Reilly, Shannon E. ; Redzovic, Sadije ; Bolch, Wesley E. ; Hintenlang, David E. ; Borak, Thomas B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b297t-27546b60b32512beb4252bd79cccb93d049cbfb36ccd9ebef87fd739292229883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Air Travel</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiography - adverse effects</topic><topic>Radiography - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radiometry</topic><topic>REGULAR ARTICLES</topic><topic>Scattering, Radiation</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><topic>X-Rays - adverse effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stepusin, Elliott J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maynard, Matthew R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Reilly, Shannon E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redzovic, Sadije</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolch, Wesley E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hintenlang, David E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borak, Thomas B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Radiation research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stepusin, Elliott J.</au><au>Maynard, Matthew R.</au><au>O'Reilly, Shannon E.</au><au>Redzovic, Sadije</au><au>Bolch, Wesley E.</au><au>Hintenlang, David E.</au><au>Borak, Thomas B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Organ Doses to Airline Passengers Screened by X-Ray Backscatter Imaging Systems</atitle><jtitle>Radiation research</jtitle><addtitle>Radiat Res</addtitle><date>2017-02</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>187</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>229</spage><epage>240</epage><pages>229-240</pages><issn>0033-7587</issn><eissn>1938-5404</eissn><abstract>Advanced imaging technologies (AIT) are being developed for passenger airline transportation. They are designed to provide enhanced security benefits by identifying objects on passengers that would not be detected by methodologies now used for routine surveillance. X-ray backscatter imaging is one AIT system being considered. Since this technology is based on scanning passengers with ionizing radiation, concern has been raised relating to the health risks associated with these exposures. Recommendations for standards of radiation safety have been proposed by the American National Standards Institute published in ANSI/HPS N43.17-2009. A Monte Carlo based methodology for estimating organ doses received from an X-ray backscatter AIT system is presented. Radiological properties of a reference scanner including beam intensity, geometry and energy spectra were modeled based on previous studies and physical measurements. These parameters were incorporated into a Monte Carlo source subroutine and validated with comparison of simulated versus measured data. One extension of this study was to calculate organ and effective dose on a wide range of potential passengers. Computational phantoms with realistic morphologies were used including adults of 5th, 25th, 50th, 75th and 95th percentile weight, children of 5th, 50th and 95th percentile weight, and the developing fetus of 15, 25, and 38 weeks after conception. Additional sensitivity studies were performed to evaluate effects of passenger positioning within the scanner, energy spectrum and beam geometry, as well as failure mode analyses. Results for routine operations yielded a maximum effective dose to the adult and pediatric passengers of 15 and 25 nSv per screen, respectively. The developing fetus received a maximum organ dose and whole body dose of 16 nGy and 8.5 nGy per screen, respectively. The sensitivity analyses indicated that variations in positioning, energy spectra, and beam geometry yielded a range of effective doses per screen that were an order of magnitude below the ANSI recommendation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The Radiation Research Society</pub><pmid>28118113</pmid><doi>10.1667/RR4516.1</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-7587
ispartof Radiation research, 2017-02, Vol.187 (2), p.229-240
issn 0033-7587
1938-5404
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1861855450
source JSTOR
subjects Adult
Air Travel
Equipment Design
Female
Humans
Male
Phantoms, Imaging
Radiation Dosage
Radiography - adverse effects
Radiography - instrumentation
Radiometry
REGULAR ARTICLES
Scattering, Radiation
Space life sciences
X-Rays - adverse effects
title Organ Doses to Airline Passengers Screened by X-Ray Backscatter Imaging Systems
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T17%3A34%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Organ%20Doses%20to%20Airline%20Passengers%20Screened%20by%20X-Ray%20Backscatter%20Imaging%20Systems&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20research&rft.au=Stepusin,%20Elliott%20J.&rft.date=2017-02&rft.volume=187&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=229&rft.epage=240&rft.pages=229-240&rft.issn=0033-7587&rft.eissn=1938-5404&rft_id=info:doi/10.1667/RR4516.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26428151%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b297t-27546b60b32512beb4252bd79cccb93d049cbfb36ccd9ebef87fd739292229883%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1861855450&rft_id=info:pmid/28118113&rft_jstor_id=26428151&rfr_iscdi=true