A comparison of network sampling designs for a hidden population of drug users: Random walk vs. respondent-driven sampling

Both random walk and respondent-driven sampling (RDS) exploit social networks and may reduce biases introduced by earlier methods for sampling from hidden populations. Although RDS has become much more widely used by social researchers than random walk (RW), there has been little discussion of the t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Social science research 2017-02, Vol.62, p.350-361
Main Authors: Bell, David C., Erbaugh, Elizabeth B., Serrano, Tabitha, Dayton-Shotts, Cheryl A., Montoya, Isaac D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Hidden populations
Network sampling
Random walk
Respondent-driven sampling
Social networks
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Both random walk and respondent-driven sampling (RDS) exploit social networks and may reduce biases introduced by earlier methods for sampling from hidden populations. Although RDS has become much more widely used by social researchers than random walk (RW), there has been little discussion of the tradeoffs in choosing RDS over RW. This paper compares experiences of implementing RW and RDS to recruit drug users to a network-based study in Houston, Texas. Both recruitment methods were implemented over comparable periods of time, with the same population, by the same research staff. RDS methods recruited more participants with less strain on staff. However, participants recruited through RW were more forthcoming than RDS participants in helping to recruit members of their social networks. Findings indicate that, dependent upon study goals, researchers' choice of design may influence participant recruitment, participant commitment, and impact on staff, factors that may in turn affect overall study success.
ISSN:0049-089X
1096-0317
DOI:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.08.016