Utility of postoperative radiography in routine primary total shoulder arthroplasty

• Published in: Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery 2017-07, Vol.26 (7), p.e222-e226
• Main Authors: Dempsey, Ian J., MD, MBA, Kew, Michelle E., MD, Cancienne, Jourdan M., MD, Werner, Brian C., MD, Brockmeier, Stephen F., MD
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aged; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder; cost-effectiveness; Female; health care economics; Humans; Joint Diseases - complications; Joint Diseases - diagnosis; Joint Diseases - surgery; Male; Middle Aged; Orthopedics; Postoperative Care; Postoperative Complications - diagnostic imaging; Primary total shoulder arthroplasty; Radiography; Retrospective Studies; Time Factors; utility; X-ray
• ISSN: 1058-2746; 1532-6500
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.11.035

Background The medical relevance and cost-benefit of routine radiographs after primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) up to a year postoperatively are unknown. This study was performed to assess the medical relevance and cost-benefit of radiography after TSA during the first postoperative year. Methods During the period 2010 to 2015, 160 consecutive patients undergoing anatomic TSA by a single fellowship-trained surgeon had radiographs obtained at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 4 months, and 1 year postoperatively. Radiographs and clinic notes were assessed to determine if a change in postoperative care happened because of radiographic findings, including postoperative fracture, hardware complication, or any concerning radiographic feature. Cost data and amount billed were obtained. Results Patients underwent radiography at 1.8 ± 0.2 weeks, 6.5 ± 1.2 weeks, 14.9 ± 2.9 weeks, and 46.8 ± 19.5 weeks postoperatively. Findings on the radiologist's reading were normal/unremarkable for 100.0%, 96.8%, 95.9%, and 95.2%, respectively, at each visit. Results were documented in the note for 92.5%, 97.4%, 98.0%, and 92.4%, respectively, at each visit. Review of the radiographs yielded no change in management based on these parameters. The amount billed for radiographs was $284,281 ($1776.76 per patient). Conclusions A lack of clinically meaningful impact from routine postoperative radiography does not justify the per-patient expense, as routine imaging did not cause a change in postoperative management. The available data suggest that routine radiographs after primary anatomic TSA may be unnecessary or perhaps the described frequency in which radiographs are obtained is in excess.