Trunk and lower limb biomechanics during stair climbing in people with and without symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement

• Published in: Clinical biomechanics (Bristol) 2017-02, Vol.42, p.108-114
• Main Authors: Hammond, Connor A, Hatfield, Gillian L, Gilbart, Michael K, Jayne Garland, S, Hunt, Michael A
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Ankle Joint - physiopathology; Biomechanical Phenomena; Biomechanics; Case-Control Studies; Electromyography; Female; Femoracetabular Impingement - physiopathology; Femoroacetabular impingement; Gait - physiology; Hip; Humans; Knee Joint - physiopathology; Lower Extremity - physiopathology; Male; Movement - physiology; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation; Range of Motion, Articular - physiology; Stair climbing; Stair Climbing - physiology; Torso - physiopathology; Young Adult
• ISSN: 0268-0033; 1879-1271
• DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.01.015

Abstract Background Femoroacetabular impingement is a pathomechanical hip condition leading to pain and impaired physical function. It has been shown that those with femoroacetabular impingement exhibit altered gait characteristics during level walking and stair climbing, and decreased muscle force production during isometric muscle contractions. However, no studies to-date have looked at trunk kinematics or muscle activation during dynamic movements such as stair climbing in this patient population. The purpose of this study was to compare biomechanical outcomes (trunk and lower limb kinematics as well as lower limb kinetics and muscle activation) during stair climbing in those with and without symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement. Methods Trunk, hip, knee and ankle kinematics, as well as hip, knee and ankle kinetics and muscle activity of nine lower limb muscles were collected during stair climbing for 20 people with clinical and radiographic femoroacetabular impingement and compared to 20 age- and sex-matched pain-free individuals. Findings Those with femoroacetabular impingement ascended the stairs slower (effect size = 0.82), had significantly increased peak trunk forward flexion angles (effect size = 0.99) and external hip flexion moments (effect size = 0.94) and had decreased peak external knee flexion moments (effect size = 0.90) compared to the control group. Interpretation Findings from this study indicate that while those with and without femoroacetabular impingement exhibit many biomechanical similarities when ascending stairs, differences in trunk forward flexion and joint kinetics indicate some important differences. Further longitudinal research is required to elucidate the cause of these differences as well as the clinical relevance.