Dominant Male Red Junglefowl (Gallus gallus) Test the Dominance Status of Other Males

In sexual selection, honest signals are maintained by a variety of mechanisms. In red junglefowl (Gallus gallus), health, condition and social status affect comb size, a well-documented predictor of female choice. The comb size of subordinate male junglefowl appears to be suppressed when in the comp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Behavioral ecology and sociobiology 2002-12, Vol.53 (1), p.20-24
Main Authors: Parker, Timothy H., Ligon, J. David
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Animal ethology
Aves
Biological and medical sciences
Evolution
Experimentation
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Honesty
Human aggression
Human sexual behavior
Male animals
Mating behavior
Personality traits
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Social behavior
Sparrows
Vertebrata
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In sexual selection, honest signals are maintained by a variety of mechanisms. In red junglefowl (Gallus gallus), health, condition and social status affect comb size, a well-documented predictor of female choice. The comb size of subordinate male junglefowl appears to be suppressed when in the company of other males. One hypothesis for how social status could affect ornament expression in this way involves punishment of cheaters. Under this scenario, dominant males periodically challenge similar males signalling putative high status. For subordinate males, the risk of fighting a high-ranked male could make it prohibitively costly to develop ornamentation signalling dominance. We asked if dominance signals influenced the direction of aggression by dominant males. To address this issue, we conducted experiments in which 19 dominant-acting, large-combed male junglefowl were allowed to choose to fight one of two opponents. The two potential fight opponents differed in comb size, dominance behaviour, or in both traits. In 15 of 19 trials, dominant-acting males chose to fight large-combed, dominant-acting opponents rather than small-combed, subordinate-acting opponents. This is the first demonstration that aggression of dominant male birds is directed at other males based on the display of an ornament known to be attractive to females. However, males did not discriminate between fight opponents when potential opponents differed in only one of the two status indicators (large-combed males chosen in 11 of 19 trials, dominant-acting males chosen in 10 of 19 trials).
ISSN:0340-5443
1432-0762
DOI:10.1007/s00265-002-0544-5