Territorial Cohesion, Territorialism, Territoriality, and Soft Planning: A Critical Review

Territorial cohesion is a shared EU competence, but what is territory? This paper seeks to alert planners—in particular those involved in European spatial planning—that common-sense answers do not necessarily apply: it is not a container. A view of macrospace as filled with territories-as-containers...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environment and planning. A 2013-06, Vol.45 (6), p.1302-1317
Main Author: Faludi, Andreas
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bargaining
Bgi / Prodig
Conceptualization
Europe
European Union
Human geography
Planning methods
Regionalism
Territoriality
Urban geography
Urbanism and town planning
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Territorial cohesion is a shared EU competence, but what is territory? This paper seeks to alert planners—in particular those involved in European spatial planning—that common-sense answers do not necessarily apply: it is not a container. A view of macrospace as filled with territories-as-containers—territorialism—is nonetheless the basis for common misunderstandings about the EU, and also about European planning, now being articulated in terms of territorial cohesion. Leaving the container view behind means that control over territories—territoriality—must be negotiated, something that relational regionalism also suggests. The planning literature is beginning to absorb such views, articulating soft rather than hard forms of planning for ‘soft spaces’. Hard planning is bound to continue, but it will be embedded in new practices, including the conceptualisation of multiple visions on territory.
ISSN:0308-518X
1472-3409
DOI:10.1068/a45299