Enamel wear by antagonistic restorative materials under erosive conditions

Objectives This study aimed to analyse loss of enamel worn against composite, leucite glass ceramic or enamel antagonists under non-erosive and alternating or simultanuous erosive-attritive conditions. Materials and methods Flat human enamel specimens were loaded (1 Hz, 300 g loading weight, each su...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical oral investigations 2017-12, Vol.21 (9), p.2689-2693
Main Authors: Wiegand, Annette, Credé, Aleksandra, Tschammler, Claudia, Attin, Thomas, Tauböck, Tobias T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Aluminum Silicates - adverse effects
Ceramics - adverse effects
Citric acid
Composite Resins - adverse effects
Dental enamel
Dental Enamel - drug effects
Dental erosion
Dental Porcelain - adverse effects
Dentistry
Enamel
Humans
In Vitro Techniques
Materials Testing
Mechanical loading
Medicine
Original Article
pH effects
Surface Properties
Tooth Erosion - chemically induced
Tooth Wear - chemically induced
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives This study aimed to analyse loss of enamel worn against composite, leucite glass ceramic or enamel antagonists under non-erosive and alternating or simultanuous erosive-attritive conditions. Materials and methods Flat human enamel specimens were loaded (1 Hz, 300 g loading weight, each subgroup n  = 12) with antagonists made from a hybrid-composite (Z250, 3 M Espe), a nano-composite (Filtek Supreme XTE, 3 M Espe), leucite glass ceramic (IPS Empress CAD LT, Ivoclar Vivadent) or enamel. Specimens were either submitted to mechanical loading in mineral solution (60 s) or to loading under alternating or simultaneous erosive conditions. For alternating erosion-attrition, specimens were eroded by citric acid (pH 2.6, 60 s) and then loaded with the respective antagonist for 60s. For simultaneous erosion-attrition, specimens were loaded with the respective antagonist while being immersed in citric acid (pH 2.6, 60 s). After each cycle, specimens were stored in water for 1 h. After 18 cycles, enamel loss was calculated profilometrically and statistically analysed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc tests ( p  
ISSN:1432-6981
1436-3771
DOI:10.1007/s00784-017-2071-9