Loading…

Functional evaluation of treatment of chronic disease: Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Spiritual Well-Being Scale

This study was conducted for the purpose of adapting the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp) for the Turkish context and determining its validity and reliability. In 2016, a convenience sample of 137 cancer patients from Malatya State Hospital compl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Palliative & supportive care 2017-12, Vol.15 (6), p.684-692
Main Authors: Aktürk, Ümmühan, Erci, Behice, Araz, Murat
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-330928ca66b95ff6dee18bf3526f65bfa313685ceab9f003cbecfe1ac88054753
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-330928ca66b95ff6dee18bf3526f65bfa313685ceab9f003cbecfe1ac88054753
container_end_page 692
container_issue 6
container_start_page 684
container_title Palliative & supportive care
container_volume 15
creator Aktürk, Ümmühan
Erci, Behice
Araz, Murat
description This study was conducted for the purpose of adapting the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp) for the Turkish context and determining its validity and reliability. In 2016, a convenience sample of 137 cancer patients from Malatya State Hospital completed a structured questionnaire, which provided demographic characteristics, and the FACIT-Sp-12 for patients with cancer. The obtained data were assessed using Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient (α), Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient (r), factor analysis, Bartlett's test of sphericity, and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy. The result of the KMO test was determined to be 0.827 and that of Bartlett's test 988.692, and both were observed to be significant at a level of p 
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1478951517000013
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1867542560</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1478951517000013</cupid><sourcerecordid>1972304287</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-330928ca66b95ff6dee18bf3526f65bfa313685ceab9f003cbecfe1ac88054753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1O3TAQhS0EAkp5ADbIEhs2KXZ8_ZPuAJW2EhKLS9tlNHHGXIOT3NoJEm_Qx64jLqgqwhv7jL45Y80h5IizT5xxfbbkC20qySXXLB8utsj-XCoqWYrt1zeXe-RDSveMlaVgepfslYYbIZTYJ3-upt6OfughUHyEMMEs6ODoGBHGDvtxFnYVh95b2vqEkPAz_QnBt358otC3NGLw0Pgw67lzhfR2ig8-regjxvRimMvLtY9-nPKwXxhCcYG-v6NLCwE_kh0HIeHh5j4gP66-3F5-K65vvn6_PL8urNBiLIRgVWksKNVU0jnVInLTOCFL5ZRsHAgulJEWoakcY8I2aB1ysMYwudBSHJDTZ991HH5PmMa688nmz0CPw5RqbpSWi1IqltGT_9D7YYp5U5mqdF7lojQ6U_yZsnFIKaKr19F3EJ9qzuo5pvpNTLnneOM8NR22rx0vuWRAbEyha6Jv7_Cf2e_a_gW7DJ3Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1972304287</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Functional evaluation of treatment of chronic disease: Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Spiritual Well-Being Scale</title><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>Aktürk, Ümmühan ; Erci, Behice ; Araz, Murat</creator><creatorcontrib>Aktürk, Ümmühan ; Erci, Behice ; Araz, Murat</creatorcontrib><description>This study was conducted for the purpose of adapting the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp) for the Turkish context and determining its validity and reliability. In 2016, a convenience sample of 137 cancer patients from Malatya State Hospital completed a structured questionnaire, which provided demographic characteristics, and the FACIT-Sp-12 for patients with cancer. The obtained data were assessed using Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient (α), Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient (r), factor analysis, Bartlett's test of sphericity, and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy. The result of the KMO test was determined to be 0.827 and that of Bartlett's test 988.692, and both were observed to be significant at a level of p &lt; 0.001. The value of Cronbach's α for the Spiritual Well-Being Scale (SWBS) was determined to be 0.87, and the α values for the SWBS subgroups ranged from 0.78 to 0.93. Our analysis determined that the factors had initial eigenvalues above 1, and that they accounted for 61.61% of the total variance. Our study determined that the Turkish version of the FACIT-Sp has validity and reliability and can be used in Turkish society. We believe that the scale can be used safely in determining convenient care and in planning individual educational programs to enhance patients' spiritual well-being.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1478-9515</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-9523</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1478951517000013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28183363</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Chemotherapy ; Chronic Disease - psychology ; Chronic Disease - therapy ; Chronic illnesses ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Neoplasms - psychology ; Neoplasms - therapy ; Original Articles ; Psychometrics - instrumentation ; Psychometrics - methods ; Psychometrics - standards ; Quality of life ; Questionnaires ; Religion ; Reproducibility of Results ; Spirituality ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Turkey ; Validity ; Well being</subject><ispartof>Palliative &amp; supportive care, 2017-12, Vol.15 (6), p.684-692</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-330928ca66b95ff6dee18bf3526f65bfa313685ceab9f003cbecfe1ac88054753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-330928ca66b95ff6dee18bf3526f65bfa313685ceab9f003cbecfe1ac88054753</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2203-5223</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1478951517000013/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,72931</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28183363$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aktürk, Ümmühan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erci, Behice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araz, Murat</creatorcontrib><title>Functional evaluation of treatment of chronic disease: Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Spiritual Well-Being Scale</title><title>Palliative &amp; supportive care</title><addtitle>Pall Supp Care</addtitle><description>This study was conducted for the purpose of adapting the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp) for the Turkish context and determining its validity and reliability. In 2016, a convenience sample of 137 cancer patients from Malatya State Hospital completed a structured questionnaire, which provided demographic characteristics, and the FACIT-Sp-12 for patients with cancer. The obtained data were assessed using Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient (α), Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient (r), factor analysis, Bartlett's test of sphericity, and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy. The result of the KMO test was determined to be 0.827 and that of Bartlett's test 988.692, and both were observed to be significant at a level of p &lt; 0.001. The value of Cronbach's α for the Spiritual Well-Being Scale (SWBS) was determined to be 0.87, and the α values for the SWBS subgroups ranged from 0.78 to 0.93. Our analysis determined that the factors had initial eigenvalues above 1, and that they accounted for 61.61% of the total variance. Our study determined that the Turkish version of the FACIT-Sp has validity and reliability and can be used in Turkish society. We believe that the scale can be used safely in determining convenient care and in planning individual educational programs to enhance patients' spiritual well-being.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Chronic Disease - psychology</subject><subject>Chronic Disease - therapy</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Original Articles</subject><subject>Psychometrics - instrumentation</subject><subject>Psychometrics - methods</subject><subject>Psychometrics - standards</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Spirituality</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Turkey</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Well being</subject><issn>1478-9515</issn><issn>1478-9523</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1O3TAQhS0EAkp5ADbIEhs2KXZ8_ZPuAJW2EhKLS9tlNHHGXIOT3NoJEm_Qx64jLqgqwhv7jL45Y80h5IizT5xxfbbkC20qySXXLB8utsj-XCoqWYrt1zeXe-RDSveMlaVgepfslYYbIZTYJ3-upt6OfughUHyEMMEs6ODoGBHGDvtxFnYVh95b2vqEkPAz_QnBt358otC3NGLw0Pgw67lzhfR2ig8-regjxvRimMvLtY9-nPKwXxhCcYG-v6NLCwE_kh0HIeHh5j4gP66-3F5-K65vvn6_PL8urNBiLIRgVWksKNVU0jnVInLTOCFL5ZRsHAgulJEWoakcY8I2aB1ysMYwudBSHJDTZ991HH5PmMa688nmz0CPw5RqbpSWi1IqltGT_9D7YYp5U5mqdF7lojQ6U_yZsnFIKaKr19F3EJ9qzuo5pvpNTLnneOM8NR22rx0vuWRAbEyha6Jv7_Cf2e_a_gW7DJ3Y</recordid><startdate>201712</startdate><enddate>201712</enddate><creator>Aktürk, Ümmühan</creator><creator>Erci, Behice</creator><creator>Araz, Murat</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2203-5223</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201712</creationdate><title>Functional evaluation of treatment of chronic disease: Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Spiritual Well-Being Scale</title><author>Aktürk, Ümmühan ; Erci, Behice ; Araz, Murat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-330928ca66b95ff6dee18bf3526f65bfa313685ceab9f003cbecfe1ac88054753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Chronic Disease - psychology</topic><topic>Chronic Disease - therapy</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Original Articles</topic><topic>Psychometrics - instrumentation</topic><topic>Psychometrics - methods</topic><topic>Psychometrics - standards</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Spirituality</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Turkey</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Well being</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aktürk, Ümmühan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erci, Behice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araz, Murat</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Palliative &amp; supportive care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aktürk, Ümmühan</au><au>Erci, Behice</au><au>Araz, Murat</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Functional evaluation of treatment of chronic disease: Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Spiritual Well-Being Scale</atitle><jtitle>Palliative &amp; supportive care</jtitle><addtitle>Pall Supp Care</addtitle><date>2017-12</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>684</spage><epage>692</epage><pages>684-692</pages><issn>1478-9515</issn><eissn>1478-9523</eissn><abstract>This study was conducted for the purpose of adapting the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp) for the Turkish context and determining its validity and reliability. In 2016, a convenience sample of 137 cancer patients from Malatya State Hospital completed a structured questionnaire, which provided demographic characteristics, and the FACIT-Sp-12 for patients with cancer. The obtained data were assessed using Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient (α), Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient (r), factor analysis, Bartlett's test of sphericity, and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy. The result of the KMO test was determined to be 0.827 and that of Bartlett's test 988.692, and both were observed to be significant at a level of p &lt; 0.001. The value of Cronbach's α for the Spiritual Well-Being Scale (SWBS) was determined to be 0.87, and the α values for the SWBS subgroups ranged from 0.78 to 0.93. Our analysis determined that the factors had initial eigenvalues above 1, and that they accounted for 61.61% of the total variance. Our study determined that the Turkish version of the FACIT-Sp has validity and reliability and can be used in Turkish society. We believe that the scale can be used safely in determining convenient care and in planning individual educational programs to enhance patients' spiritual well-being.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>28183363</pmid><doi>10.1017/S1478951517000013</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2203-5223</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1478-9515
ispartof Palliative & supportive care, 2017-12, Vol.15 (6), p.684-692
issn 1478-9515
1478-9523
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1867542560
source Cambridge University Press
subjects Adult
Aged
Chemotherapy
Chronic Disease - psychology
Chronic Disease - therapy
Chronic illnesses
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Mortality
Neoplasms - psychology
Neoplasms - therapy
Original Articles
Psychometrics - instrumentation
Psychometrics - methods
Psychometrics - standards
Quality of life
Questionnaires
Religion
Reproducibility of Results
Spirituality
Surveys and Questionnaires
Turkey
Validity
Well being
title Functional evaluation of treatment of chronic disease: Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Spiritual Well-Being Scale
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T21%3A21%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Functional%20evaluation%20of%20treatment%20of%20chronic%20disease:%20Validity%20and%20reliability%20of%20the%20Turkish%20version%20of%20the%20Spiritual%20Well-Being%20Scale&rft.jtitle=Palliative%20&%20supportive%20care&rft.au=Akt%C3%BCrk,%20%C3%9Cmm%C3%BChan&rft.date=2017-12&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=684&rft.epage=692&rft.pages=684-692&rft.issn=1478-9515&rft.eissn=1478-9523&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1478951517000013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1972304287%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-330928ca66b95ff6dee18bf3526f65bfa313685ceab9f003cbecfe1ac88054753%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1972304287&rft_id=info:pmid/28183363&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1478951517000013&rfr_iscdi=true