Loading…
Functional evaluation of treatment of chronic disease: Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Spiritual Well-Being Scale
This study was conducted for the purpose of adapting the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp) for the Turkish context and determining its validity and reliability. In 2016, a convenience sample of 137 cancer patients from Malatya State Hospital compl...
Saved in:
Published in: | Palliative & supportive care 2017-12, Vol.15 (6), p.684-692 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-330928ca66b95ff6dee18bf3526f65bfa313685ceab9f003cbecfe1ac88054753 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-330928ca66b95ff6dee18bf3526f65bfa313685ceab9f003cbecfe1ac88054753 |
container_end_page | 692 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 684 |
container_title | Palliative & supportive care |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Aktürk, Ümmühan Erci, Behice Araz, Murat |
description | This study was conducted for the purpose of adapting the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp) for the Turkish context and determining its validity and reliability.
In 2016, a convenience sample of 137 cancer patients from Malatya State Hospital completed a structured questionnaire, which provided demographic characteristics, and the FACIT-Sp-12 for patients with cancer. The obtained data were assessed using Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient (α), Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient (r), factor analysis, Bartlett's test of sphericity, and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy.
The result of the KMO test was determined to be 0.827 and that of Bartlett's test 988.692, and both were observed to be significant at a level of p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1478951517000013 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1867542560</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1478951517000013</cupid><sourcerecordid>1972304287</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-330928ca66b95ff6dee18bf3526f65bfa313685ceab9f003cbecfe1ac88054753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1O3TAQhS0EAkp5ADbIEhs2KXZ8_ZPuAJW2EhKLS9tlNHHGXIOT3NoJEm_Qx64jLqgqwhv7jL45Y80h5IizT5xxfbbkC20qySXXLB8utsj-XCoqWYrt1zeXe-RDSveMlaVgepfslYYbIZTYJ3-upt6OfughUHyEMMEs6ODoGBHGDvtxFnYVh95b2vqEkPAz_QnBt358otC3NGLw0Pgw67lzhfR2ig8-regjxvRimMvLtY9-nPKwXxhCcYG-v6NLCwE_kh0HIeHh5j4gP66-3F5-K65vvn6_PL8urNBiLIRgVWksKNVU0jnVInLTOCFL5ZRsHAgulJEWoakcY8I2aB1ysMYwudBSHJDTZ991HH5PmMa688nmz0CPw5RqbpSWi1IqltGT_9D7YYp5U5mqdF7lojQ6U_yZsnFIKaKr19F3EJ9qzuo5pvpNTLnneOM8NR22rx0vuWRAbEyha6Jv7_Cf2e_a_gW7DJ3Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1972304287</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Functional evaluation of treatment of chronic disease: Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Spiritual Well-Being Scale</title><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>Aktürk, Ümmühan ; Erci, Behice ; Araz, Murat</creator><creatorcontrib>Aktürk, Ümmühan ; Erci, Behice ; Araz, Murat</creatorcontrib><description>This study was conducted for the purpose of adapting the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp) for the Turkish context and determining its validity and reliability.
In 2016, a convenience sample of 137 cancer patients from Malatya State Hospital completed a structured questionnaire, which provided demographic characteristics, and the FACIT-Sp-12 for patients with cancer. The obtained data were assessed using Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient (α), Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient (r), factor analysis, Bartlett's test of sphericity, and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy.
The result of the KMO test was determined to be 0.827 and that of Bartlett's test 988.692, and both were observed to be significant at a level of p < 0.001. The value of Cronbach's α for the Spiritual Well-Being Scale (SWBS) was determined to be 0.87, and the α values for the SWBS subgroups ranged from 0.78 to 0.93. Our analysis determined that the factors had initial eigenvalues above 1, and that they accounted for 61.61% of the total variance.
Our study determined that the Turkish version of the FACIT-Sp has validity and reliability and can be used in Turkish society. We believe that the scale can be used safely in determining convenient care and in planning individual educational programs to enhance patients' spiritual well-being.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1478-9515</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-9523</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1478951517000013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28183363</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Chemotherapy ; Chronic Disease - psychology ; Chronic Disease - therapy ; Chronic illnesses ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Neoplasms - psychology ; Neoplasms - therapy ; Original Articles ; Psychometrics - instrumentation ; Psychometrics - methods ; Psychometrics - standards ; Quality of life ; Questionnaires ; Religion ; Reproducibility of Results ; Spirituality ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Turkey ; Validity ; Well being</subject><ispartof>Palliative & supportive care, 2017-12, Vol.15 (6), p.684-692</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-330928ca66b95ff6dee18bf3526f65bfa313685ceab9f003cbecfe1ac88054753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-330928ca66b95ff6dee18bf3526f65bfa313685ceab9f003cbecfe1ac88054753</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2203-5223</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1478951517000013/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,72931</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28183363$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aktürk, Ümmühan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erci, Behice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araz, Murat</creatorcontrib><title>Functional evaluation of treatment of chronic disease: Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Spiritual Well-Being Scale</title><title>Palliative & supportive care</title><addtitle>Pall Supp Care</addtitle><description>This study was conducted for the purpose of adapting the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp) for the Turkish context and determining its validity and reliability.
In 2016, a convenience sample of 137 cancer patients from Malatya State Hospital completed a structured questionnaire, which provided demographic characteristics, and the FACIT-Sp-12 for patients with cancer. The obtained data were assessed using Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient (α), Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient (r), factor analysis, Bartlett's test of sphericity, and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy.
The result of the KMO test was determined to be 0.827 and that of Bartlett's test 988.692, and both were observed to be significant at a level of p < 0.001. The value of Cronbach's α for the Spiritual Well-Being Scale (SWBS) was determined to be 0.87, and the α values for the SWBS subgroups ranged from 0.78 to 0.93. Our analysis determined that the factors had initial eigenvalues above 1, and that they accounted for 61.61% of the total variance.
Our study determined that the Turkish version of the FACIT-Sp has validity and reliability and can be used in Turkish society. We believe that the scale can be used safely in determining convenient care and in planning individual educational programs to enhance patients' spiritual well-being.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Chronic Disease - psychology</subject><subject>Chronic Disease - therapy</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Original Articles</subject><subject>Psychometrics - instrumentation</subject><subject>Psychometrics - methods</subject><subject>Psychometrics - standards</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Spirituality</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Turkey</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Well being</subject><issn>1478-9515</issn><issn>1478-9523</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1O3TAQhS0EAkp5ADbIEhs2KXZ8_ZPuAJW2EhKLS9tlNHHGXIOT3NoJEm_Qx64jLqgqwhv7jL45Y80h5IizT5xxfbbkC20qySXXLB8utsj-XCoqWYrt1zeXe-RDSveMlaVgepfslYYbIZTYJ3-upt6OfughUHyEMMEs6ODoGBHGDvtxFnYVh95b2vqEkPAz_QnBt358otC3NGLw0Pgw67lzhfR2ig8-regjxvRimMvLtY9-nPKwXxhCcYG-v6NLCwE_kh0HIeHh5j4gP66-3F5-K65vvn6_PL8urNBiLIRgVWksKNVU0jnVInLTOCFL5ZRsHAgulJEWoakcY8I2aB1ysMYwudBSHJDTZ991HH5PmMa688nmz0CPw5RqbpSWi1IqltGT_9D7YYp5U5mqdF7lojQ6U_yZsnFIKaKr19F3EJ9qzuo5pvpNTLnneOM8NR22rx0vuWRAbEyha6Jv7_Cf2e_a_gW7DJ3Y</recordid><startdate>201712</startdate><enddate>201712</enddate><creator>Aktürk, Ümmühan</creator><creator>Erci, Behice</creator><creator>Araz, Murat</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2203-5223</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201712</creationdate><title>Functional evaluation of treatment of chronic disease: Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Spiritual Well-Being Scale</title><author>Aktürk, Ümmühan ; Erci, Behice ; Araz, Murat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-330928ca66b95ff6dee18bf3526f65bfa313685ceab9f003cbecfe1ac88054753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Chronic Disease - psychology</topic><topic>Chronic Disease - therapy</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Original Articles</topic><topic>Psychometrics - instrumentation</topic><topic>Psychometrics - methods</topic><topic>Psychometrics - standards</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Spirituality</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Turkey</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Well being</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aktürk, Ümmühan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erci, Behice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araz, Murat</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Palliative & supportive care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aktürk, Ümmühan</au><au>Erci, Behice</au><au>Araz, Murat</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Functional evaluation of treatment of chronic disease: Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Spiritual Well-Being Scale</atitle><jtitle>Palliative & supportive care</jtitle><addtitle>Pall Supp Care</addtitle><date>2017-12</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>684</spage><epage>692</epage><pages>684-692</pages><issn>1478-9515</issn><eissn>1478-9523</eissn><abstract>This study was conducted for the purpose of adapting the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp) for the Turkish context and determining its validity and reliability.
In 2016, a convenience sample of 137 cancer patients from Malatya State Hospital completed a structured questionnaire, which provided demographic characteristics, and the FACIT-Sp-12 for patients with cancer. The obtained data were assessed using Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient (α), Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient (r), factor analysis, Bartlett's test of sphericity, and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy.
The result of the KMO test was determined to be 0.827 and that of Bartlett's test 988.692, and both were observed to be significant at a level of p < 0.001. The value of Cronbach's α for the Spiritual Well-Being Scale (SWBS) was determined to be 0.87, and the α values for the SWBS subgroups ranged from 0.78 to 0.93. Our analysis determined that the factors had initial eigenvalues above 1, and that they accounted for 61.61% of the total variance.
Our study determined that the Turkish version of the FACIT-Sp has validity and reliability and can be used in Turkish society. We believe that the scale can be used safely in determining convenient care and in planning individual educational programs to enhance patients' spiritual well-being.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>28183363</pmid><doi>10.1017/S1478951517000013</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2203-5223</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1478-9515 |
ispartof | Palliative & supportive care, 2017-12, Vol.15 (6), p.684-692 |
issn | 1478-9515 1478-9523 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1867542560 |
source | Cambridge University Press |
subjects | Adult Aged Chemotherapy Chronic Disease - psychology Chronic Disease - therapy Chronic illnesses Female Humans Male Middle Aged Mortality Neoplasms - psychology Neoplasms - therapy Original Articles Psychometrics - instrumentation Psychometrics - methods Psychometrics - standards Quality of life Questionnaires Religion Reproducibility of Results Spirituality Surveys and Questionnaires Turkey Validity Well being |
title | Functional evaluation of treatment of chronic disease: Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Spiritual Well-Being Scale |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T21%3A21%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Functional%20evaluation%20of%20treatment%20of%20chronic%20disease:%20Validity%20and%20reliability%20of%20the%20Turkish%20version%20of%20the%20Spiritual%20Well-Being%20Scale&rft.jtitle=Palliative%20&%20supportive%20care&rft.au=Akt%C3%BCrk,%20%C3%9Cmm%C3%BChan&rft.date=2017-12&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=684&rft.epage=692&rft.pages=684-692&rft.issn=1478-9515&rft.eissn=1478-9523&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1478951517000013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1972304287%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-330928ca66b95ff6dee18bf3526f65bfa313685ceab9f003cbecfe1ac88054753%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1972304287&rft_id=info:pmid/28183363&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1478951517000013&rfr_iscdi=true |