Quantifying how acquired interactions with native and invasive insects influence population growth rates of a non-indigenous plant

• Published in: Biological invasions 2017-03, Vol.19 (3), p.895-911
• Main Authors: Falcón, Wilfredo, Ackerman, James D., Tremblay, Raymond L.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Ants; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Demographics; Demography; Developmental Biology; Ecology; Fecundity; Formicidae; Freshwater & Marine Ecology; Growth rate; Hypotheses; Indigenous plants; Indigenous species; Insects; Interspecific relationships; Introduced species; Invasive insects; Invasive plants; Invasive species; Life cycles; Life Sciences; Native species; Nonnative species; Orchidaceae; Original Paper; Pest resistance; Plant populations; Plant Sciences; Population growth; Population studies; Solenopsis invicta; Spathoglottis plicata; Stochastic processes; Stochasticity; Structured matrices
• ISSN: 1387-3547; 1573-1464
• DOI: 10.1007/s10530-016-1318-8

Non-native species often acquire novel interspecific interactions, which are central to several hypotheses of invasion success, including biotic resistance and invasional meltdown. However, the outcome of these interactions is not often linked with the demographic evidence based on the full life cycle of the species. The Philippine Ground Orchid ( Spathoglottis plicata ) has invaded Puerto Rico and has acquired both negative and positive interspecific interactions involving the native weevil Stethobaris polita and the invasive red fire ant Solenopsis invicta , respectively. We studied a population in the Rio Abajo Forest, and asked how these interactions affect population demography by using a combination of field, experimental and modelling approaches. Stage-structured matrix population models based on four years of field observations showed that the population of S. plicata is growing at a rate (λ) of 1.05 under natural conditions. When we modified fecundity values based on experimental exclusion of weevils and ants, the control treatment showed a similar λ. Excluding weevils increased λ to 1.20, whereas the exclusion of ants decreased λ to 1.03. When we incorporate demographic and environmental stochasticity in our models, exclusion of invasive red fire ants significantly reduces the orchid abundance over time. Although weevils offer some biotic resistance to S. plicata, these effects do not prevent orchid population growth and expansion. On the other hand, invasive red fire ants have a positive effect on the invasive orchid’s λ, partially supporting the invasional meltdown hypothesis. This study presents a method that allows one to combine opposing mechanisms of species interactions within the same quantitative framework, and the results highlight the importance of considering acquired plant–animal interactions and stochastic processes when evaluating the population growth rates and dynamics of invasive plants.