Loading…

SPECT-CT Comparison of Lung Deposition using a System combining a Vibrating-mesh Nebulizer with a Valved Holding Chamber and a Conventional Jet Nebulizer: a Randomized Cross-over Study

Purpose To compare in vivo the total and regional pulmonary deposition of aerosol particles generated by a new system combining a vibrating-mesh nebulizer with a specific valved holding chamber and constant-output jet nebulizer connected to a corrugated tube. Methods Cross-over study comparing aeros...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pharmaceutical research 2017-02, Vol.34 (2), p.290-300
Main Authors: Dugernier, Jonathan, Hesse, Michel, Vanbever, Rita, Depoortere, Virginie, Roeseler, Jean, Michotte, Jean-Bernard, Laterre, Pierre-François, Jamar, François, Reychler, Gregory
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose To compare in vivo the total and regional pulmonary deposition of aerosol particles generated by a new system combining a vibrating-mesh nebulizer with a specific valved holding chamber and constant-output jet nebulizer connected to a corrugated tube. Methods Cross-over study comparing aerosol delivery to the lungs using two nebulizers in 6 healthy male subjects: a vibrating-mesh nebulizer combined with a valved holding chamber (Aerogen Ultra®, Aerogen Ltd., Galway, Ireland) and a jet nebulizer connected to a corrugated tube (Opti-Mist Plus Nebulizer®, ConvaTec, Bridgewater, NJ). Nebulizers were filled with diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid labelled with technetium-99 m ( 99m Tc-DTPA, 2 mCi/4 mL). Pulmonary deposition of 99m Tc-DTPA was measured by single-photon emission computed tomography combined with a low dose CT-scan (SPECT-CT). Results Pulmonary aerosol deposition from SPECT-CT analysis was six times increased with the vibrating-mesh nebulizer as compared to the jet nebulizer (34.1 ± 6.0% versus 5.2 ± 1.1%, p  
ISSN:0724-8741
1573-904X
DOI:10.1007/s11095-016-2061-7