Movement Patterns of the Knee During Gait Following ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

• Published in: Sports medicine (Auckland) 2016-12, Vol.46 (12), p.1869-1895
• Main Authors: Kaur, Mandeep, Ribeiro, Daniel Cury, Theis, Jean-Claude, Webster, Kate E., Sole, Gisela
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anterior Cruciate Ligament; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - physiopathology; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - surgery; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction; Arthritis; Biomechanical Phenomena - physiology; Biomechanics; Funding; Gait - physiology; Humans; Kinematics; Knee; Knee Joint; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Meta-analysis; Rehabilitation; Sports injuries; Sports Medicine; Studies; Surgery; Systematic Review; Walking
• ISSN: 0112-1642; 1179-2035
• DOI: 10.1007/s40279-016-0510-4

Background Altered gait patterns follow ing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) may be associated with long-term impairments and post-traumatic osteoarthritis. Objective This systematic review and meta-analysis compared lower limb kinematics and kinetics of the ACL reconstructed knee with (1) the contralateral limb and (2) healthy age-matched participants during walking, stair climbing, and running. The secondary aim was to describe the differences over time following ACLR for these biomechanical variables. Method Database searches were conducted from inception to July 2014 and updated in August 2015 for studies exploring peak knee angles and moments following ACLR during walking, stair negotiation, and running. Risk of bias was assessed with a modified Downs and Black quality index for all included studies, and meta-analyses were performed. Forest plots were explored qualitatively for recovery of gait variables over time after surgery. Results A total of 40 studies were included in the review; 26 of these were rated as low risk and 14 as high risk of bias. The meta-analysis included 27 studies. Strong to moderate evidence indicated no significant difference in peak flexion angles between ACLR and control groups during walking and stair ascent. Strong evidence was found for lower peak flexion moments in participants with ACLR compared with control groups and contralateral limb during walking and stair activities. Strong to moderate evidence was found for lower peak adduction moment in ACLR participants for the injured compared with the contralateral limbs during walking and stair descent. The qualitative assessment for recovery over time indicated a pattern towards restoration of peak knee flexion angle with increasing time from post-surgery. Peak knee adduction moments were lower within the first year following surgery and higher than controls during later phases (5 years). Conclusion Joint kinematics are restored, on average, 6 years following reconstruction, while knee external flexion moments remain lower than controls. Knee adduction moments are lower during early phases following reconstruction, but are higher than controls, on average, 5 years post-surgery. Findings indicate that knee function is not fully restored following reconstruction, and long-term maintenance programs may be needed.