Comparison between SGLT2 inhibitors and DPP4 inhibitors added to insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review with indirect comparison meta‐analysis

• Published in: Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews 2017-01, Vol.33 (1), p.np-n/a
• Main Authors: Min, Se Hee, Yoon, Jeong‐Hwa, Hahn, Seokyung, Cho, Young Min
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - drug therapy; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 - chemistry; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors - therapeutic use; DPP4 inhibitor; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents - therapeutic use; insulin; Insulin - therapeutic use; meta‐analysis; Prognosis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; SGLT2 inhibitor; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 - antagonists & inhibitors; type 2 diabetes
• ISSN: 1520-7552; 1520-7560
• DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.2818

Background Both sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 (DPP4) inhibitors can be used to treat patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) that is inadequately controlled with insulin therapy, and yet there has been no direct comparison of these two inhibitors. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov through June 2015. Randomized controlled trials published in English that compare SGLT2 inhibitor plus insulin (SGLT2i/INS) with placebo plus insulin or DPP4 inhibitor plus insulin (DPP4i/INS) with placebo plus insulin in patients with T2DM were selected. Data on the study characteristics, efficacy and safety outcomes were extracted. We compared the efficacy and safety between SGLT2i/INS and DPP4i/INS indirectly with covariates adjustment. Risk of potential bias was assessed. Results Fourteen eligible randomized controlled trials comprising 6980 patients were included (five SGLT2 inhibitor studies and nine DPP4 inhibitor studies). Covariate‐adjusted indirect comparison using meta‐regression analyses revealed that SGLT2i/INS achieved greater reduction in HbA1c [weighted mean difference (WMD) −0.24%, 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.43 to −0.05%], fasting plasma glucose (WMD −18.0 mg/dL, 95% CI −28.5 to −7.6 mg/dL) and body weight (WMD −2.38 kg, 95% CI −3.18 to −1.58 kg) from baseline than DPP4i/INS without increasing the risk of hypoglycaemia (relative risks 1.19, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.82). Conclusions Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors achieved better glycaemic control and greater weight reduction than DPP4 inhibitors without increasing the risk of hypoglycaemia in patients with T2DM that is inadequately controlled with insulin. There has been no direct comparison of SGLT2 inhibitors and DPP4 inhibitors in patients with T2DM inadequately controlled with insulin therapy. In this study, we performed indirect meta‐analysis comparing SGLT2 inhibitors and DPP4 inhibitors added to insulin therapy. Without increasing hypoglycaemia, SGLT2 inhibitors showed better glycaemic control and greater weight reduction than DPP4 inhibitors in patients with T2DM inadequately controlled with insulin. The results of the current study could serve as the best available evidence in selecting oral agents to improve glycaemic control in insulin‐treated T2DM patients. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.