Loading…

Sensory deficits after a radial nerve injury

Background The aim of our study was to objectively test sensibility on the dorsal side of the hand in patients with radial nerve injury, to document deficits and to detect if surgery for sensory reconstruction is needed. Methods Nineteen patients of mean age 31 ± 10 years were examined at a mean of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Microsurgery 2018-02, Vol.38 (2), p.151-156
Main Authors: Bertelli, Jayme Augusto, Cavalli, Erica, Mendes Lehn, Vera Lúcia, Ghizoni, Marcos Flávio
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3571-678457f6d39868b025940615e9ac19bafdc583a374896b17469bc38ac293f24c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3571-678457f6d39868b025940615e9ac19bafdc583a374896b17469bc38ac293f24c3
container_end_page 156
container_issue 2
container_start_page 151
container_title Microsurgery
container_volume 38
creator Bertelli, Jayme Augusto
Cavalli, Erica
Mendes Lehn, Vera Lúcia
Ghizoni, Marcos Flávio
description Background The aim of our study was to objectively test sensibility on the dorsal side of the hand in patients with radial nerve injury, to document deficits and to detect if surgery for sensory reconstruction is needed. Methods Nineteen patients of mean age 31 ± 10 years were examined at a mean of 26.4 ± 27.8 months post radial nerve injury. Sensory mechanical thresholds on the dorsal surface of the hand were evaluated using Semmes‐Weinstein monofilaments. Sensation was considered significantly impaired when there was no perception of a 2.0 gr. Semmes‐Weinstein filament. Nociception was evaluated using Adson forceps. Results Five patients had normal 2.0 monofilament perception. Two of these five also had normal perception of the lighter 0.05 monofilament. In nine patients, zones of impaired sensibility were restricted to the first web space. In combined radial and musculocutaneous nerve lesions, the zone of impaired sensibility extended to the dorsum of the third metacarpus and occasionally to the dorsal aspect of the thumb. This zone averaged being five times the size as in isolated radial nerve injuries. On average, the zone of decreased 0.05 monofilament perception was six times the size detected for the 2.0 monofilament. No patient had complete anesthesia over the dorsum of the hand. No patient complained about pain or numbness. Only one patient among four with a combined radial and musculocutaneous nerve injury required sensory reconstruction. Conclusions Minimal sensory abnormalities should be expected after a radial nerve injury. Patients likely neither warrant nor request sensory reconstruction.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/micr.30161
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1869069717</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1869069717</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3571-678457f6d39868b025940615e9ac19bafdc583a374896b17469bc38ac293f24c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90M1LwzAYx_EgipvTi3-AFLyI2Pkkad6OMnwZTARfziFNU8jo2pmsSv97Ozs9ePD0XD78ePgidIphigHI9crbMKWAOd5DYwxKpkQwso_GIKhMMUg2QkcxLgFAKaEO0YhIAowwMkZXL66OTeiSwpXe-k1MTLlxITFJMIU3VVK78OESXy_b0B2jg9JU0Z3s7gS93d2-zh7SxdP9fHazSC1lAqdcyIyJkhdUSS5zIExlwDFzylisclMWlklqqMik4jkWGVe5pdJYomhJMksn6GLYXYfmvXVxo1c-WldVpnZNGzWWXAFXAouenv-hy6YNdf-dJn0bBURy2qvLQdnQxBhcqdfBr0zoNAa9bai3DfV3wx6f7SbbfOWKX_oTrQd4AJ--ct0_U_pxPnseRr8AU7x4uQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2002902863</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sensory deficits after a radial nerve injury</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Bertelli, Jayme Augusto ; Cavalli, Erica ; Mendes Lehn, Vera Lúcia ; Ghizoni, Marcos Flávio</creator><creatorcontrib>Bertelli, Jayme Augusto ; Cavalli, Erica ; Mendes Lehn, Vera Lúcia ; Ghizoni, Marcos Flávio</creatorcontrib><description>Background The aim of our study was to objectively test sensibility on the dorsal side of the hand in patients with radial nerve injury, to document deficits and to detect if surgery for sensory reconstruction is needed. Methods Nineteen patients of mean age 31 ± 10 years were examined at a mean of 26.4 ± 27.8 months post radial nerve injury. Sensory mechanical thresholds on the dorsal surface of the hand were evaluated using Semmes‐Weinstein monofilaments. Sensation was considered significantly impaired when there was no perception of a 2.0 gr. Semmes‐Weinstein filament. Nociception was evaluated using Adson forceps. Results Five patients had normal 2.0 monofilament perception. Two of these five also had normal perception of the lighter 0.05 monofilament. In nine patients, zones of impaired sensibility were restricted to the first web space. In combined radial and musculocutaneous nerve lesions, the zone of impaired sensibility extended to the dorsum of the third metacarpus and occasionally to the dorsal aspect of the thumb. This zone averaged being five times the size as in isolated radial nerve injuries. On average, the zone of decreased 0.05 monofilament perception was six times the size detected for the 2.0 monofilament. No patient had complete anesthesia over the dorsum of the hand. No patient complained about pain or numbness. Only one patient among four with a combined radial and musculocutaneous nerve injury required sensory reconstruction. Conclusions Minimal sensory abnormalities should be expected after a radial nerve injury. Patients likely neither warrant nor request sensory reconstruction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0738-1085</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-2752</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/micr.30161</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28205252</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Abnormalities ; Anesthesia ; Injuries ; Lesions ; Medical instruments ; Metacarpus ; Microsurgery ; Pain ; Pain perception ; Patients ; Perception ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Microsurgery, 2018-02, Vol.38 (2), p.151-156</ispartof><rights>2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3571-678457f6d39868b025940615e9ac19bafdc583a374896b17469bc38ac293f24c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3571-678457f6d39868b025940615e9ac19bafdc583a374896b17469bc38ac293f24c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9890-5080</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28205252$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bertelli, Jayme Augusto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavalli, Erica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendes Lehn, Vera Lúcia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghizoni, Marcos Flávio</creatorcontrib><title>Sensory deficits after a radial nerve injury</title><title>Microsurgery</title><addtitle>Microsurgery</addtitle><description>Background The aim of our study was to objectively test sensibility on the dorsal side of the hand in patients with radial nerve injury, to document deficits and to detect if surgery for sensory reconstruction is needed. Methods Nineteen patients of mean age 31 ± 10 years were examined at a mean of 26.4 ± 27.8 months post radial nerve injury. Sensory mechanical thresholds on the dorsal surface of the hand were evaluated using Semmes‐Weinstein monofilaments. Sensation was considered significantly impaired when there was no perception of a 2.0 gr. Semmes‐Weinstein filament. Nociception was evaluated using Adson forceps. Results Five patients had normal 2.0 monofilament perception. Two of these five also had normal perception of the lighter 0.05 monofilament. In nine patients, zones of impaired sensibility were restricted to the first web space. In combined radial and musculocutaneous nerve lesions, the zone of impaired sensibility extended to the dorsum of the third metacarpus and occasionally to the dorsal aspect of the thumb. This zone averaged being five times the size as in isolated radial nerve injuries. On average, the zone of decreased 0.05 monofilament perception was six times the size detected for the 2.0 monofilament. No patient had complete anesthesia over the dorsum of the hand. No patient complained about pain or numbness. Only one patient among four with a combined radial and musculocutaneous nerve injury required sensory reconstruction. Conclusions Minimal sensory abnormalities should be expected after a radial nerve injury. Patients likely neither warrant nor request sensory reconstruction.</description><subject>Abnormalities</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Medical instruments</subject><subject>Metacarpus</subject><subject>Microsurgery</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain perception</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0738-1085</issn><issn>1098-2752</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90M1LwzAYx_EgipvTi3-AFLyI2Pkkad6OMnwZTARfziFNU8jo2pmsSv97Ozs9ePD0XD78ePgidIphigHI9crbMKWAOd5DYwxKpkQwso_GIKhMMUg2QkcxLgFAKaEO0YhIAowwMkZXL66OTeiSwpXe-k1MTLlxITFJMIU3VVK78OESXy_b0B2jg9JU0Z3s7gS93d2-zh7SxdP9fHazSC1lAqdcyIyJkhdUSS5zIExlwDFzylisclMWlklqqMik4jkWGVe5pdJYomhJMksn6GLYXYfmvXVxo1c-WldVpnZNGzWWXAFXAouenv-hy6YNdf-dJn0bBURy2qvLQdnQxBhcqdfBr0zoNAa9bai3DfV3wx6f7SbbfOWKX_oTrQd4AJ--ct0_U_pxPnseRr8AU7x4uQ</recordid><startdate>201802</startdate><enddate>201802</enddate><creator>Bertelli, Jayme Augusto</creator><creator>Cavalli, Erica</creator><creator>Mendes Lehn, Vera Lúcia</creator><creator>Ghizoni, Marcos Flávio</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9890-5080</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201802</creationdate><title>Sensory deficits after a radial nerve injury</title><author>Bertelli, Jayme Augusto ; Cavalli, Erica ; Mendes Lehn, Vera Lúcia ; Ghizoni, Marcos Flávio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3571-678457f6d39868b025940615e9ac19bafdc583a374896b17469bc38ac293f24c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Abnormalities</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Medical instruments</topic><topic>Metacarpus</topic><topic>Microsurgery</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain perception</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bertelli, Jayme Augusto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavalli, Erica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendes Lehn, Vera Lúcia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghizoni, Marcos Flávio</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Microsurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bertelli, Jayme Augusto</au><au>Cavalli, Erica</au><au>Mendes Lehn, Vera Lúcia</au><au>Ghizoni, Marcos Flávio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sensory deficits after a radial nerve injury</atitle><jtitle>Microsurgery</jtitle><addtitle>Microsurgery</addtitle><date>2018-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>151</spage><epage>156</epage><pages>151-156</pages><issn>0738-1085</issn><eissn>1098-2752</eissn><abstract>Background The aim of our study was to objectively test sensibility on the dorsal side of the hand in patients with radial nerve injury, to document deficits and to detect if surgery for sensory reconstruction is needed. Methods Nineteen patients of mean age 31 ± 10 years were examined at a mean of 26.4 ± 27.8 months post radial nerve injury. Sensory mechanical thresholds on the dorsal surface of the hand were evaluated using Semmes‐Weinstein monofilaments. Sensation was considered significantly impaired when there was no perception of a 2.0 gr. Semmes‐Weinstein filament. Nociception was evaluated using Adson forceps. Results Five patients had normal 2.0 monofilament perception. Two of these five also had normal perception of the lighter 0.05 monofilament. In nine patients, zones of impaired sensibility were restricted to the first web space. In combined radial and musculocutaneous nerve lesions, the zone of impaired sensibility extended to the dorsum of the third metacarpus and occasionally to the dorsal aspect of the thumb. This zone averaged being five times the size as in isolated radial nerve injuries. On average, the zone of decreased 0.05 monofilament perception was six times the size detected for the 2.0 monofilament. No patient had complete anesthesia over the dorsum of the hand. No patient complained about pain or numbness. Only one patient among four with a combined radial and musculocutaneous nerve injury required sensory reconstruction. Conclusions Minimal sensory abnormalities should be expected after a radial nerve injury. Patients likely neither warrant nor request sensory reconstruction.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28205252</pmid><doi>10.1002/micr.30161</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9890-5080</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0738-1085
ispartof Microsurgery, 2018-02, Vol.38 (2), p.151-156
issn 0738-1085
1098-2752
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1869069717
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Abnormalities
Anesthesia
Injuries
Lesions
Medical instruments
Metacarpus
Microsurgery
Pain
Pain perception
Patients
Perception
Surgery
title Sensory deficits after a radial nerve injury
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T01%3A28%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sensory%20deficits%20after%20a%20radial%20nerve%20injury&rft.jtitle=Microsurgery&rft.au=Bertelli,%20Jayme%20Augusto&rft.date=2018-02&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=151&rft.epage=156&rft.pages=151-156&rft.issn=0738-1085&rft.eissn=1098-2752&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/micr.30161&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1869069717%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3571-678457f6d39868b025940615e9ac19bafdc583a374896b17469bc38ac293f24c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2002902863&rft_id=info:pmid/28205252&rfr_iscdi=true