Loading…
Sensory deficits after a radial nerve injury
Background The aim of our study was to objectively test sensibility on the dorsal side of the hand in patients with radial nerve injury, to document deficits and to detect if surgery for sensory reconstruction is needed. Methods Nineteen patients of mean age 31 ± 10 years were examined at a mean of...
Saved in:
Published in: | Microsurgery 2018-02, Vol.38 (2), p.151-156 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3571-678457f6d39868b025940615e9ac19bafdc583a374896b17469bc38ac293f24c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3571-678457f6d39868b025940615e9ac19bafdc583a374896b17469bc38ac293f24c3 |
container_end_page | 156 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 151 |
container_title | Microsurgery |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Bertelli, Jayme Augusto Cavalli, Erica Mendes Lehn, Vera Lúcia Ghizoni, Marcos Flávio |
description | Background
The aim of our study was to objectively test sensibility on the dorsal side of the hand in patients with radial nerve injury, to document deficits and to detect if surgery for sensory reconstruction is needed.
Methods
Nineteen patients of mean age 31 ± 10 years were examined at a mean of 26.4 ± 27.8 months post radial nerve injury. Sensory mechanical thresholds on the dorsal surface of the hand were evaluated using Semmes‐Weinstein monofilaments. Sensation was considered significantly impaired when there was no perception of a 2.0 gr. Semmes‐Weinstein filament. Nociception was evaluated using Adson forceps.
Results
Five patients had normal 2.0 monofilament perception. Two of these five also had normal perception of the lighter 0.05 monofilament. In nine patients, zones of impaired sensibility were restricted to the first web space. In combined radial and musculocutaneous nerve lesions, the zone of impaired sensibility extended to the dorsum of the third metacarpus and occasionally to the dorsal aspect of the thumb. This zone averaged being five times the size as in isolated radial nerve injuries. On average, the zone of decreased 0.05 monofilament perception was six times the size detected for the 2.0 monofilament. No patient had complete anesthesia over the dorsum of the hand. No patient complained about pain or numbness. Only one patient among four with a combined radial and musculocutaneous nerve injury required sensory reconstruction.
Conclusions
Minimal sensory abnormalities should be expected after a radial nerve injury. Patients likely neither warrant nor request sensory reconstruction. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/micr.30161 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1869069717</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1869069717</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3571-678457f6d39868b025940615e9ac19bafdc583a374896b17469bc38ac293f24c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90M1LwzAYx_EgipvTi3-AFLyI2Pkkad6OMnwZTARfziFNU8jo2pmsSv97Ozs9ePD0XD78ePgidIphigHI9crbMKWAOd5DYwxKpkQwso_GIKhMMUg2QkcxLgFAKaEO0YhIAowwMkZXL66OTeiSwpXe-k1MTLlxITFJMIU3VVK78OESXy_b0B2jg9JU0Z3s7gS93d2-zh7SxdP9fHazSC1lAqdcyIyJkhdUSS5zIExlwDFzylisclMWlklqqMik4jkWGVe5pdJYomhJMksn6GLYXYfmvXVxo1c-WldVpnZNGzWWXAFXAouenv-hy6YNdf-dJn0bBURy2qvLQdnQxBhcqdfBr0zoNAa9bai3DfV3wx6f7SbbfOWKX_oTrQd4AJ--ct0_U_pxPnseRr8AU7x4uQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2002902863</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sensory deficits after a radial nerve injury</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Bertelli, Jayme Augusto ; Cavalli, Erica ; Mendes Lehn, Vera Lúcia ; Ghizoni, Marcos Flávio</creator><creatorcontrib>Bertelli, Jayme Augusto ; Cavalli, Erica ; Mendes Lehn, Vera Lúcia ; Ghizoni, Marcos Flávio</creatorcontrib><description>Background
The aim of our study was to objectively test sensibility on the dorsal side of the hand in patients with radial nerve injury, to document deficits and to detect if surgery for sensory reconstruction is needed.
Methods
Nineteen patients of mean age 31 ± 10 years were examined at a mean of 26.4 ± 27.8 months post radial nerve injury. Sensory mechanical thresholds on the dorsal surface of the hand were evaluated using Semmes‐Weinstein monofilaments. Sensation was considered significantly impaired when there was no perception of a 2.0 gr. Semmes‐Weinstein filament. Nociception was evaluated using Adson forceps.
Results
Five patients had normal 2.0 monofilament perception. Two of these five also had normal perception of the lighter 0.05 monofilament. In nine patients, zones of impaired sensibility were restricted to the first web space. In combined radial and musculocutaneous nerve lesions, the zone of impaired sensibility extended to the dorsum of the third metacarpus and occasionally to the dorsal aspect of the thumb. This zone averaged being five times the size as in isolated radial nerve injuries. On average, the zone of decreased 0.05 monofilament perception was six times the size detected for the 2.0 monofilament. No patient had complete anesthesia over the dorsum of the hand. No patient complained about pain or numbness. Only one patient among four with a combined radial and musculocutaneous nerve injury required sensory reconstruction.
Conclusions
Minimal sensory abnormalities should be expected after a radial nerve injury. Patients likely neither warrant nor request sensory reconstruction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0738-1085</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-2752</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/micr.30161</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28205252</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Abnormalities ; Anesthesia ; Injuries ; Lesions ; Medical instruments ; Metacarpus ; Microsurgery ; Pain ; Pain perception ; Patients ; Perception ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Microsurgery, 2018-02, Vol.38 (2), p.151-156</ispartof><rights>2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3571-678457f6d39868b025940615e9ac19bafdc583a374896b17469bc38ac293f24c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3571-678457f6d39868b025940615e9ac19bafdc583a374896b17469bc38ac293f24c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9890-5080</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28205252$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bertelli, Jayme Augusto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavalli, Erica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendes Lehn, Vera Lúcia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghizoni, Marcos Flávio</creatorcontrib><title>Sensory deficits after a radial nerve injury</title><title>Microsurgery</title><addtitle>Microsurgery</addtitle><description>Background
The aim of our study was to objectively test sensibility on the dorsal side of the hand in patients with radial nerve injury, to document deficits and to detect if surgery for sensory reconstruction is needed.
Methods
Nineteen patients of mean age 31 ± 10 years were examined at a mean of 26.4 ± 27.8 months post radial nerve injury. Sensory mechanical thresholds on the dorsal surface of the hand were evaluated using Semmes‐Weinstein monofilaments. Sensation was considered significantly impaired when there was no perception of a 2.0 gr. Semmes‐Weinstein filament. Nociception was evaluated using Adson forceps.
Results
Five patients had normal 2.0 monofilament perception. Two of these five also had normal perception of the lighter 0.05 monofilament. In nine patients, zones of impaired sensibility were restricted to the first web space. In combined radial and musculocutaneous nerve lesions, the zone of impaired sensibility extended to the dorsum of the third metacarpus and occasionally to the dorsal aspect of the thumb. This zone averaged being five times the size as in isolated radial nerve injuries. On average, the zone of decreased 0.05 monofilament perception was six times the size detected for the 2.0 monofilament. No patient had complete anesthesia over the dorsum of the hand. No patient complained about pain or numbness. Only one patient among four with a combined radial and musculocutaneous nerve injury required sensory reconstruction.
Conclusions
Minimal sensory abnormalities should be expected after a radial nerve injury. Patients likely neither warrant nor request sensory reconstruction.</description><subject>Abnormalities</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Medical instruments</subject><subject>Metacarpus</subject><subject>Microsurgery</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain perception</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0738-1085</issn><issn>1098-2752</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90M1LwzAYx_EgipvTi3-AFLyI2Pkkad6OMnwZTARfziFNU8jo2pmsSv97Ozs9ePD0XD78ePgidIphigHI9crbMKWAOd5DYwxKpkQwso_GIKhMMUg2QkcxLgFAKaEO0YhIAowwMkZXL66OTeiSwpXe-k1MTLlxITFJMIU3VVK78OESXy_b0B2jg9JU0Z3s7gS93d2-zh7SxdP9fHazSC1lAqdcyIyJkhdUSS5zIExlwDFzylisclMWlklqqMik4jkWGVe5pdJYomhJMksn6GLYXYfmvXVxo1c-WldVpnZNGzWWXAFXAouenv-hy6YNdf-dJn0bBURy2qvLQdnQxBhcqdfBr0zoNAa9bai3DfV3wx6f7SbbfOWKX_oTrQd4AJ--ct0_U_pxPnseRr8AU7x4uQ</recordid><startdate>201802</startdate><enddate>201802</enddate><creator>Bertelli, Jayme Augusto</creator><creator>Cavalli, Erica</creator><creator>Mendes Lehn, Vera Lúcia</creator><creator>Ghizoni, Marcos Flávio</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9890-5080</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201802</creationdate><title>Sensory deficits after a radial nerve injury</title><author>Bertelli, Jayme Augusto ; Cavalli, Erica ; Mendes Lehn, Vera Lúcia ; Ghizoni, Marcos Flávio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3571-678457f6d39868b025940615e9ac19bafdc583a374896b17469bc38ac293f24c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Abnormalities</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Medical instruments</topic><topic>Metacarpus</topic><topic>Microsurgery</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain perception</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bertelli, Jayme Augusto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavalli, Erica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendes Lehn, Vera Lúcia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghizoni, Marcos Flávio</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Microsurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bertelli, Jayme Augusto</au><au>Cavalli, Erica</au><au>Mendes Lehn, Vera Lúcia</au><au>Ghizoni, Marcos Flávio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sensory deficits after a radial nerve injury</atitle><jtitle>Microsurgery</jtitle><addtitle>Microsurgery</addtitle><date>2018-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>151</spage><epage>156</epage><pages>151-156</pages><issn>0738-1085</issn><eissn>1098-2752</eissn><abstract>Background
The aim of our study was to objectively test sensibility on the dorsal side of the hand in patients with radial nerve injury, to document deficits and to detect if surgery for sensory reconstruction is needed.
Methods
Nineteen patients of mean age 31 ± 10 years were examined at a mean of 26.4 ± 27.8 months post radial nerve injury. Sensory mechanical thresholds on the dorsal surface of the hand were evaluated using Semmes‐Weinstein monofilaments. Sensation was considered significantly impaired when there was no perception of a 2.0 gr. Semmes‐Weinstein filament. Nociception was evaluated using Adson forceps.
Results
Five patients had normal 2.0 monofilament perception. Two of these five also had normal perception of the lighter 0.05 monofilament. In nine patients, zones of impaired sensibility were restricted to the first web space. In combined radial and musculocutaneous nerve lesions, the zone of impaired sensibility extended to the dorsum of the third metacarpus and occasionally to the dorsal aspect of the thumb. This zone averaged being five times the size as in isolated radial nerve injuries. On average, the zone of decreased 0.05 monofilament perception was six times the size detected for the 2.0 monofilament. No patient had complete anesthesia over the dorsum of the hand. No patient complained about pain or numbness. Only one patient among four with a combined radial and musculocutaneous nerve injury required sensory reconstruction.
Conclusions
Minimal sensory abnormalities should be expected after a radial nerve injury. Patients likely neither warrant nor request sensory reconstruction.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28205252</pmid><doi>10.1002/micr.30161</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9890-5080</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0738-1085 |
ispartof | Microsurgery, 2018-02, Vol.38 (2), p.151-156 |
issn | 0738-1085 1098-2752 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1869069717 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Abnormalities Anesthesia Injuries Lesions Medical instruments Metacarpus Microsurgery Pain Pain perception Patients Perception Surgery |
title | Sensory deficits after a radial nerve injury |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T01%3A28%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sensory%20deficits%20after%20a%20radial%20nerve%20injury&rft.jtitle=Microsurgery&rft.au=Bertelli,%20Jayme%20Augusto&rft.date=2018-02&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=151&rft.epage=156&rft.pages=151-156&rft.issn=0738-1085&rft.eissn=1098-2752&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/micr.30161&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1869069717%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3571-678457f6d39868b025940615e9ac19bafdc583a374896b17469bc38ac293f24c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2002902863&rft_id=info:pmid/28205252&rfr_iscdi=true |