On the distinction between value-driven attention and selection history: Evidence from individuals with depressive symptoms

When predictive of extrinsic reward as targets, stimuli rapidly acquire the ability to automatically capture attention. Attentional biases for former targets of visual search also can develop without reward feedback but typically require much longer training. These learned biases towards former targ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychonomic bulletin & review 2017-10, Vol.24 (5), p.1636-1642
Main Authors: Anderson, Brian A., Chiu, Michelle, DiBartolo, Michelle M., Leal, Stephanie L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Attention - physiology
Attentional Bias - physiology
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Brief Report
Cognitive Psychology
Depression - physiopathology
Female
Humans
Learning - physiology
Male
Psychology
Reward
Young Adult
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:When predictive of extrinsic reward as targets, stimuli rapidly acquire the ability to automatically capture attention. Attentional biases for former targets of visual search also can develop without reward feedback but typically require much longer training. These learned biases towards former targets often are conceptualized within a single framework and might differ merely in degree. That is, both are the result of the reinforcement of selection history, with extrinsic reward for correct report of the target providing greater reinforcement than correct report alone. A direct test of this shared mechanisms hypothesis is lacking, however. Recent evidence demonstrates that depressed individuals present with blunted value-driven attentional biases. Based on the shared mechanisms hypothesis, we predicted that depressed individuals would similarly show blunted attentional biases for former targets following unrewarded training. To the contrary, however, we found that the effects of selection history on attention were robust and equivalent between individuals experiencing depressive symptoms and control participants, whereas attentional capture by previously reward-associated stimuli was blunted in depressed individuals. Our results suggest a qualitative distinction between the effects of reward history and the effects of selection history on attention, with depressive symptoms impairing the former while leaving the latter unaffected.
ISSN:1069-9384
1531-5320
DOI:10.3758/s13423-017-1240-9