Loading…

No impact of repeated extinction exposures on operant responding maintained by different reinforcer rates

•Resistance to extinction was greater with greater reinforcement rates in a multiple schedule.•This pattern persisted across twelve repeated tests of extinction and resembled satiation tests.•More dynamic training and testing could reverse these effects. Greater rates of intermittent reinforcement i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Behavioural processes 2017-05, Vol.138, p.29-33
Main Authors: Bai, John Y.H., Podlesnik, Christopher A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-89941a33ba6fece28795a95ca40766915c1624d372759654c817eae00cfd33fc3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-89941a33ba6fece28795a95ca40766915c1624d372759654c817eae00cfd33fc3
container_end_page 33
container_issue
container_start_page 29
container_title Behavioural processes
container_volume 138
creator Bai, John Y.H.
Podlesnik, Christopher A.
description •Resistance to extinction was greater with greater reinforcement rates in a multiple schedule.•This pattern persisted across twelve repeated tests of extinction and resembled satiation tests.•More dynamic training and testing could reverse these effects. Greater rates of intermittent reinforcement in the presence of discriminative stimuli generally produce greater resistance to extinction, consistent with predictions of behavioral momentum theory. Other studies reveal more rapid extinction with higher rates of reinforcers – the partial reinforcement extinction effect. Further, repeated extinction often produces more rapid decreases in operant responding due to learning a discrimination between training and extinction contingencies. The present study examined extinction repeatedly with training with different rates of intermittent reinforcement in a multiple schedule. We assessed whether repeated extinction would reverse the pattern of greater resistance to extinction with greater reinforcer rates. Counter to this prediction, resistance to extinction was consistently greater across twelve assessments of training followed by six successive sessions of extinction. Moreover, patterns of responding during extinction resembled those observed during satiation tests, which should not alter discrimination processes with repeated testing. These findings join others suggesting operant responding in extinction can be durable across repeated tests.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.02.011
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1870641009</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0376635716304156</els_id><sourcerecordid>2021737992</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-89941a33ba6fece28795a95ca40766915c1624d372759654c817eae00cfd33fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9rHSEUxaW0NK9Jv0EoA91kM5Orzui4CZSQ_oGQbpK1-Jxr8PFGp-qU5NvH9CVddNGFXC_8zlHOIeSUQkeBivNdt8UlRdsxoLID1gGlb8iGjpK1I4fxLdkAl6IVfJBH5EPOOwCgI4j35IiNjArKYEP8TWz8vBhbmuiahAuaglODD8UHW3wM9brEvCbMTV3igsmEUsG8xDD5cN_MxodST1VtH5vJO4cJ_yA-uJgspiZVz3xC3jmzz_jxZR6Tu69Xt5ff2-uf335cfrluLVdQ2lGpnhrOt0Y4tMhGqQajBmt6kEIoOlgqWD9xyeSgxNDbkUo0CGDdxLmz_JicHXxrOL9WzEXPPlvc703AuGZdAwLRUwBV0c__oLu4plB_pxkwKrlUilWqP1A2xZwTOr0kP5v0qCno5yr0Th-q0M9VaGC6VlFln17M1-2M01_Ra_YVuDgAWNP47THpbD0Gi5NPaIueov__C08LI5yI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2021737992</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>No impact of repeated extinction exposures on operant responding maintained by different reinforcer rates</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Bai, John Y.H. ; Podlesnik, Christopher A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bai, John Y.H. ; Podlesnik, Christopher A.</creatorcontrib><description>•Resistance to extinction was greater with greater reinforcement rates in a multiple schedule.•This pattern persisted across twelve repeated tests of extinction and resembled satiation tests.•More dynamic training and testing could reverse these effects. Greater rates of intermittent reinforcement in the presence of discriminative stimuli generally produce greater resistance to extinction, consistent with predictions of behavioral momentum theory. Other studies reveal more rapid extinction with higher rates of reinforcers – the partial reinforcement extinction effect. Further, repeated extinction often produces more rapid decreases in operant responding due to learning a discrimination between training and extinction contingencies. The present study examined extinction repeatedly with training with different rates of intermittent reinforcement in a multiple schedule. We assessed whether repeated extinction would reverse the pattern of greater resistance to extinction with greater reinforcer rates. Counter to this prediction, resistance to extinction was consistently greater across twelve assessments of training followed by six successive sessions of extinction. Moreover, patterns of responding during extinction resembled those observed during satiation tests, which should not alter discrimination processes with repeated testing. These findings join others suggesting operant responding in extinction can be durable across repeated tests.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0376-6357</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8308</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.02.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28216120</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animals ; Columbidae ; Conditioning, Operant ; Discrimination ; Discriminative stimuli ; Extinction ; Extinction, Psychological ; Learning ; Male ; Multiple schedule ; Operant conditioning ; Partial reinforcement ; Partial reinforcement extinction effect ; Pigeon ; Reinforcement ; Reinforcement (Psychology) ; Reinforcement Schedule ; Reinforcer rate ; Repeated extinction ; Resistance to extinction ; Response strength ; Satiation ; Satiety</subject><ispartof>Behavioural processes, 2017-05, Vol.138, p.29-33</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. May 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-89941a33ba6fece28795a95ca40766915c1624d372759654c817eae00cfd33fc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-89941a33ba6fece28795a95ca40766915c1624d372759654c817eae00cfd33fc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28216120$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bai, John Y.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Podlesnik, Christopher A.</creatorcontrib><title>No impact of repeated extinction exposures on operant responding maintained by different reinforcer rates</title><title>Behavioural processes</title><addtitle>Behav Processes</addtitle><description>•Resistance to extinction was greater with greater reinforcement rates in a multiple schedule.•This pattern persisted across twelve repeated tests of extinction and resembled satiation tests.•More dynamic training and testing could reverse these effects. Greater rates of intermittent reinforcement in the presence of discriminative stimuli generally produce greater resistance to extinction, consistent with predictions of behavioral momentum theory. Other studies reveal more rapid extinction with higher rates of reinforcers – the partial reinforcement extinction effect. Further, repeated extinction often produces more rapid decreases in operant responding due to learning a discrimination between training and extinction contingencies. The present study examined extinction repeatedly with training with different rates of intermittent reinforcement in a multiple schedule. We assessed whether repeated extinction would reverse the pattern of greater resistance to extinction with greater reinforcer rates. Counter to this prediction, resistance to extinction was consistently greater across twelve assessments of training followed by six successive sessions of extinction. Moreover, patterns of responding during extinction resembled those observed during satiation tests, which should not alter discrimination processes with repeated testing. These findings join others suggesting operant responding in extinction can be durable across repeated tests.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Columbidae</subject><subject>Conditioning, Operant</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Discriminative stimuli</subject><subject>Extinction</subject><subject>Extinction, Psychological</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Multiple schedule</subject><subject>Operant conditioning</subject><subject>Partial reinforcement</subject><subject>Partial reinforcement extinction effect</subject><subject>Pigeon</subject><subject>Reinforcement</subject><subject>Reinforcement (Psychology)</subject><subject>Reinforcement Schedule</subject><subject>Reinforcer rate</subject><subject>Repeated extinction</subject><subject>Resistance to extinction</subject><subject>Response strength</subject><subject>Satiation</subject><subject>Satiety</subject><issn>0376-6357</issn><issn>1872-8308</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU9rHSEUxaW0NK9Jv0EoA91kM5Orzui4CZSQ_oGQbpK1-Jxr8PFGp-qU5NvH9CVddNGFXC_8zlHOIeSUQkeBivNdt8UlRdsxoLID1gGlb8iGjpK1I4fxLdkAl6IVfJBH5EPOOwCgI4j35IiNjArKYEP8TWz8vBhbmuiahAuaglODD8UHW3wM9brEvCbMTV3igsmEUsG8xDD5cN_MxodST1VtH5vJO4cJ_yA-uJgspiZVz3xC3jmzz_jxZR6Tu69Xt5ff2-uf335cfrluLVdQ2lGpnhrOt0Y4tMhGqQajBmt6kEIoOlgqWD9xyeSgxNDbkUo0CGDdxLmz_JicHXxrOL9WzEXPPlvc703AuGZdAwLRUwBV0c__oLu4plB_pxkwKrlUilWqP1A2xZwTOr0kP5v0qCno5yr0Th-q0M9VaGC6VlFln17M1-2M01_Ra_YVuDgAWNP47THpbD0Gi5NPaIueov__C08LI5yI</recordid><startdate>201705</startdate><enddate>201705</enddate><creator>Bai, John Y.H.</creator><creator>Podlesnik, Christopher A.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201705</creationdate><title>No impact of repeated extinction exposures on operant responding maintained by different reinforcer rates</title><author>Bai, John Y.H. ; Podlesnik, Christopher A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-89941a33ba6fece28795a95ca40766915c1624d372759654c817eae00cfd33fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Columbidae</topic><topic>Conditioning, Operant</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Discriminative stimuli</topic><topic>Extinction</topic><topic>Extinction, Psychological</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Multiple schedule</topic><topic>Operant conditioning</topic><topic>Partial reinforcement</topic><topic>Partial reinforcement extinction effect</topic><topic>Pigeon</topic><topic>Reinforcement</topic><topic>Reinforcement (Psychology)</topic><topic>Reinforcement Schedule</topic><topic>Reinforcer rate</topic><topic>Repeated extinction</topic><topic>Resistance to extinction</topic><topic>Response strength</topic><topic>Satiation</topic><topic>Satiety</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bai, John Y.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Podlesnik, Christopher A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Behavioural processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bai, John Y.H.</au><au>Podlesnik, Christopher A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>No impact of repeated extinction exposures on operant responding maintained by different reinforcer rates</atitle><jtitle>Behavioural processes</jtitle><addtitle>Behav Processes</addtitle><date>2017-05</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>138</volume><spage>29</spage><epage>33</epage><pages>29-33</pages><issn>0376-6357</issn><eissn>1872-8308</eissn><abstract>•Resistance to extinction was greater with greater reinforcement rates in a multiple schedule.•This pattern persisted across twelve repeated tests of extinction and resembled satiation tests.•More dynamic training and testing could reverse these effects. Greater rates of intermittent reinforcement in the presence of discriminative stimuli generally produce greater resistance to extinction, consistent with predictions of behavioral momentum theory. Other studies reveal more rapid extinction with higher rates of reinforcers – the partial reinforcement extinction effect. Further, repeated extinction often produces more rapid decreases in operant responding due to learning a discrimination between training and extinction contingencies. The present study examined extinction repeatedly with training with different rates of intermittent reinforcement in a multiple schedule. We assessed whether repeated extinction would reverse the pattern of greater resistance to extinction with greater reinforcer rates. Counter to this prediction, resistance to extinction was consistently greater across twelve assessments of training followed by six successive sessions of extinction. Moreover, patterns of responding during extinction resembled those observed during satiation tests, which should not alter discrimination processes with repeated testing. These findings join others suggesting operant responding in extinction can be durable across repeated tests.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>28216120</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.beproc.2017.02.011</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0376-6357
ispartof Behavioural processes, 2017-05, Vol.138, p.29-33
issn 0376-6357
1872-8308
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1870641009
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Animal behavior
Animals
Columbidae
Conditioning, Operant
Discrimination
Discriminative stimuli
Extinction
Extinction, Psychological
Learning
Male
Multiple schedule
Operant conditioning
Partial reinforcement
Partial reinforcement extinction effect
Pigeon
Reinforcement
Reinforcement (Psychology)
Reinforcement Schedule
Reinforcer rate
Repeated extinction
Resistance to extinction
Response strength
Satiation
Satiety
title No impact of repeated extinction exposures on operant responding maintained by different reinforcer rates
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-22T11%3A55%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=No%20impact%20of%20repeated%20extinction%20exposures%20on%20operant%20responding%20maintained%20by%20different%20reinforcer%20rates&rft.jtitle=Behavioural%20processes&rft.au=Bai,%20John%20Y.H.&rft.date=2017-05&rft.volume=138&rft.spage=29&rft.epage=33&rft.pages=29-33&rft.issn=0376-6357&rft.eissn=1872-8308&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.beproc.2017.02.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2021737992%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-89941a33ba6fece28795a95ca40766915c1624d372759654c817eae00cfd33fc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2021737992&rft_id=info:pmid/28216120&rfr_iscdi=true