Loading…
No impact of repeated extinction exposures on operant responding maintained by different reinforcer rates
•Resistance to extinction was greater with greater reinforcement rates in a multiple schedule.•This pattern persisted across twelve repeated tests of extinction and resembled satiation tests.•More dynamic training and testing could reverse these effects. Greater rates of intermittent reinforcement i...
Saved in:
Published in: | Behavioural processes 2017-05, Vol.138, p.29-33 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-89941a33ba6fece28795a95ca40766915c1624d372759654c817eae00cfd33fc3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-89941a33ba6fece28795a95ca40766915c1624d372759654c817eae00cfd33fc3 |
container_end_page | 33 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 29 |
container_title | Behavioural processes |
container_volume | 138 |
creator | Bai, John Y.H. Podlesnik, Christopher A. |
description | •Resistance to extinction was greater with greater reinforcement rates in a multiple schedule.•This pattern persisted across twelve repeated tests of extinction and resembled satiation tests.•More dynamic training and testing could reverse these effects.
Greater rates of intermittent reinforcement in the presence of discriminative stimuli generally produce greater resistance to extinction, consistent with predictions of behavioral momentum theory. Other studies reveal more rapid extinction with higher rates of reinforcers – the partial reinforcement extinction effect. Further, repeated extinction often produces more rapid decreases in operant responding due to learning a discrimination between training and extinction contingencies. The present study examined extinction repeatedly with training with different rates of intermittent reinforcement in a multiple schedule. We assessed whether repeated extinction would reverse the pattern of greater resistance to extinction with greater reinforcer rates. Counter to this prediction, resistance to extinction was consistently greater across twelve assessments of training followed by six successive sessions of extinction. Moreover, patterns of responding during extinction resembled those observed during satiation tests, which should not alter discrimination processes with repeated testing. These findings join others suggesting operant responding in extinction can be durable across repeated tests. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.02.011 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1870641009</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0376635716304156</els_id><sourcerecordid>2021737992</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-89941a33ba6fece28795a95ca40766915c1624d372759654c817eae00cfd33fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9rHSEUxaW0NK9Jv0EoA91kM5Orzui4CZSQ_oGQbpK1-Jxr8PFGp-qU5NvH9CVddNGFXC_8zlHOIeSUQkeBivNdt8UlRdsxoLID1gGlb8iGjpK1I4fxLdkAl6IVfJBH5EPOOwCgI4j35IiNjArKYEP8TWz8vBhbmuiahAuaglODD8UHW3wM9brEvCbMTV3igsmEUsG8xDD5cN_MxodST1VtH5vJO4cJ_yA-uJgspiZVz3xC3jmzz_jxZR6Tu69Xt5ff2-uf335cfrluLVdQ2lGpnhrOt0Y4tMhGqQajBmt6kEIoOlgqWD9xyeSgxNDbkUo0CGDdxLmz_JicHXxrOL9WzEXPPlvc703AuGZdAwLRUwBV0c__oLu4plB_pxkwKrlUilWqP1A2xZwTOr0kP5v0qCno5yr0Th-q0M9VaGC6VlFln17M1-2M01_Ra_YVuDgAWNP47THpbD0Gi5NPaIueov__C08LI5yI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2021737992</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>No impact of repeated extinction exposures on operant responding maintained by different reinforcer rates</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Bai, John Y.H. ; Podlesnik, Christopher A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bai, John Y.H. ; Podlesnik, Christopher A.</creatorcontrib><description>•Resistance to extinction was greater with greater reinforcement rates in a multiple schedule.•This pattern persisted across twelve repeated tests of extinction and resembled satiation tests.•More dynamic training and testing could reverse these effects.
Greater rates of intermittent reinforcement in the presence of discriminative stimuli generally produce greater resistance to extinction, consistent with predictions of behavioral momentum theory. Other studies reveal more rapid extinction with higher rates of reinforcers – the partial reinforcement extinction effect. Further, repeated extinction often produces more rapid decreases in operant responding due to learning a discrimination between training and extinction contingencies. The present study examined extinction repeatedly with training with different rates of intermittent reinforcement in a multiple schedule. We assessed whether repeated extinction would reverse the pattern of greater resistance to extinction with greater reinforcer rates. Counter to this prediction, resistance to extinction was consistently greater across twelve assessments of training followed by six successive sessions of extinction. Moreover, patterns of responding during extinction resembled those observed during satiation tests, which should not alter discrimination processes with repeated testing. These findings join others suggesting operant responding in extinction can be durable across repeated tests.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0376-6357</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8308</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.02.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28216120</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animals ; Columbidae ; Conditioning, Operant ; Discrimination ; Discriminative stimuli ; Extinction ; Extinction, Psychological ; Learning ; Male ; Multiple schedule ; Operant conditioning ; Partial reinforcement ; Partial reinforcement extinction effect ; Pigeon ; Reinforcement ; Reinforcement (Psychology) ; Reinforcement Schedule ; Reinforcer rate ; Repeated extinction ; Resistance to extinction ; Response strength ; Satiation ; Satiety</subject><ispartof>Behavioural processes, 2017-05, Vol.138, p.29-33</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. May 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-89941a33ba6fece28795a95ca40766915c1624d372759654c817eae00cfd33fc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-89941a33ba6fece28795a95ca40766915c1624d372759654c817eae00cfd33fc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28216120$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bai, John Y.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Podlesnik, Christopher A.</creatorcontrib><title>No impact of repeated extinction exposures on operant responding maintained by different reinforcer rates</title><title>Behavioural processes</title><addtitle>Behav Processes</addtitle><description>•Resistance to extinction was greater with greater reinforcement rates in a multiple schedule.•This pattern persisted across twelve repeated tests of extinction and resembled satiation tests.•More dynamic training and testing could reverse these effects.
Greater rates of intermittent reinforcement in the presence of discriminative stimuli generally produce greater resistance to extinction, consistent with predictions of behavioral momentum theory. Other studies reveal more rapid extinction with higher rates of reinforcers – the partial reinforcement extinction effect. Further, repeated extinction often produces more rapid decreases in operant responding due to learning a discrimination between training and extinction contingencies. The present study examined extinction repeatedly with training with different rates of intermittent reinforcement in a multiple schedule. We assessed whether repeated extinction would reverse the pattern of greater resistance to extinction with greater reinforcer rates. Counter to this prediction, resistance to extinction was consistently greater across twelve assessments of training followed by six successive sessions of extinction. Moreover, patterns of responding during extinction resembled those observed during satiation tests, which should not alter discrimination processes with repeated testing. These findings join others suggesting operant responding in extinction can be durable across repeated tests.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Columbidae</subject><subject>Conditioning, Operant</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Discriminative stimuli</subject><subject>Extinction</subject><subject>Extinction, Psychological</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Multiple schedule</subject><subject>Operant conditioning</subject><subject>Partial reinforcement</subject><subject>Partial reinforcement extinction effect</subject><subject>Pigeon</subject><subject>Reinforcement</subject><subject>Reinforcement (Psychology)</subject><subject>Reinforcement Schedule</subject><subject>Reinforcer rate</subject><subject>Repeated extinction</subject><subject>Resistance to extinction</subject><subject>Response strength</subject><subject>Satiation</subject><subject>Satiety</subject><issn>0376-6357</issn><issn>1872-8308</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU9rHSEUxaW0NK9Jv0EoA91kM5Orzui4CZSQ_oGQbpK1-Jxr8PFGp-qU5NvH9CVddNGFXC_8zlHOIeSUQkeBivNdt8UlRdsxoLID1gGlb8iGjpK1I4fxLdkAl6IVfJBH5EPOOwCgI4j35IiNjArKYEP8TWz8vBhbmuiahAuaglODD8UHW3wM9brEvCbMTV3igsmEUsG8xDD5cN_MxodST1VtH5vJO4cJ_yA-uJgspiZVz3xC3jmzz_jxZR6Tu69Xt5ff2-uf335cfrluLVdQ2lGpnhrOt0Y4tMhGqQajBmt6kEIoOlgqWD9xyeSgxNDbkUo0CGDdxLmz_JicHXxrOL9WzEXPPlvc703AuGZdAwLRUwBV0c__oLu4plB_pxkwKrlUilWqP1A2xZwTOr0kP5v0qCno5yr0Th-q0M9VaGC6VlFln17M1-2M01_Ra_YVuDgAWNP47THpbD0Gi5NPaIueov__C08LI5yI</recordid><startdate>201705</startdate><enddate>201705</enddate><creator>Bai, John Y.H.</creator><creator>Podlesnik, Christopher A.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201705</creationdate><title>No impact of repeated extinction exposures on operant responding maintained by different reinforcer rates</title><author>Bai, John Y.H. ; Podlesnik, Christopher A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-89941a33ba6fece28795a95ca40766915c1624d372759654c817eae00cfd33fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Columbidae</topic><topic>Conditioning, Operant</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Discriminative stimuli</topic><topic>Extinction</topic><topic>Extinction, Psychological</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Multiple schedule</topic><topic>Operant conditioning</topic><topic>Partial reinforcement</topic><topic>Partial reinforcement extinction effect</topic><topic>Pigeon</topic><topic>Reinforcement</topic><topic>Reinforcement (Psychology)</topic><topic>Reinforcement Schedule</topic><topic>Reinforcer rate</topic><topic>Repeated extinction</topic><topic>Resistance to extinction</topic><topic>Response strength</topic><topic>Satiation</topic><topic>Satiety</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bai, John Y.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Podlesnik, Christopher A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Behavioural processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bai, John Y.H.</au><au>Podlesnik, Christopher A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>No impact of repeated extinction exposures on operant responding maintained by different reinforcer rates</atitle><jtitle>Behavioural processes</jtitle><addtitle>Behav Processes</addtitle><date>2017-05</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>138</volume><spage>29</spage><epage>33</epage><pages>29-33</pages><issn>0376-6357</issn><eissn>1872-8308</eissn><abstract>•Resistance to extinction was greater with greater reinforcement rates in a multiple schedule.•This pattern persisted across twelve repeated tests of extinction and resembled satiation tests.•More dynamic training and testing could reverse these effects.
Greater rates of intermittent reinforcement in the presence of discriminative stimuli generally produce greater resistance to extinction, consistent with predictions of behavioral momentum theory. Other studies reveal more rapid extinction with higher rates of reinforcers – the partial reinforcement extinction effect. Further, repeated extinction often produces more rapid decreases in operant responding due to learning a discrimination between training and extinction contingencies. The present study examined extinction repeatedly with training with different rates of intermittent reinforcement in a multiple schedule. We assessed whether repeated extinction would reverse the pattern of greater resistance to extinction with greater reinforcer rates. Counter to this prediction, resistance to extinction was consistently greater across twelve assessments of training followed by six successive sessions of extinction. Moreover, patterns of responding during extinction resembled those observed during satiation tests, which should not alter discrimination processes with repeated testing. These findings join others suggesting operant responding in extinction can be durable across repeated tests.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>28216120</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.beproc.2017.02.011</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0376-6357 |
ispartof | Behavioural processes, 2017-05, Vol.138, p.29-33 |
issn | 0376-6357 1872-8308 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1870641009 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Animal behavior Animals Columbidae Conditioning, Operant Discrimination Discriminative stimuli Extinction Extinction, Psychological Learning Male Multiple schedule Operant conditioning Partial reinforcement Partial reinforcement extinction effect Pigeon Reinforcement Reinforcement (Psychology) Reinforcement Schedule Reinforcer rate Repeated extinction Resistance to extinction Response strength Satiation Satiety |
title | No impact of repeated extinction exposures on operant responding maintained by different reinforcer rates |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-22T11%3A55%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=No%20impact%20of%20repeated%20extinction%20exposures%20on%20operant%20responding%20maintained%20by%20different%20reinforcer%20rates&rft.jtitle=Behavioural%20processes&rft.au=Bai,%20John%20Y.H.&rft.date=2017-05&rft.volume=138&rft.spage=29&rft.epage=33&rft.pages=29-33&rft.issn=0376-6357&rft.eissn=1872-8308&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.beproc.2017.02.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2021737992%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-89941a33ba6fece28795a95ca40766915c1624d372759654c817eae00cfd33fc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2021737992&rft_id=info:pmid/28216120&rfr_iscdi=true |