The effects of pure potassium channel blocker nifekalant and sodium channel blocker mexiletine on malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias

• Published in: Journal of electrocardiology 2017-05, Vol.50 (3), p.277-281
• Main Authors: Otuki, Sou, MD, Hasegawa, Kanae, MD, Watanabe, Hiroshi, MD, Katsuumi, Goro, MD, Yagihara, Nobue, MD, Iijima, Kenichi, MD, Sato, Akinori, MD, Izumi, Daisuke, MD, Furushima, Hiroshi, MD, Chinushi, Masaomi, MD, Aizawa, Yoshifusa, MD, Minamino, Tohru, MD
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Administration, Oral; Arrhythmias; Beta blockers; Cardiac arrhythmia; Cardiovascular; Cardiovascular disease; Drugs; Electrical storm; Electroencephalography - drug effects; Heart diseases; Humans; Japan - epidemiology; Mexiletine - administration & dosage; Potassium; Potassium Channel Blockers - administration & dosage; Prevalence; Pyrimidinones - administration & dosage; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Sodium; Sodium Channel Blockers - administration & dosage; Sudden death; Survival Rate; Tachycardia, Ventricular - diagnosis; Tachycardia, Ventricular - drug therapy; Tachycardia, Ventricular - mortality; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 0022-0736; 1532-8430
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2016.09.005

Abstract Background Patients with repetitive ventricular tachyarrhythmias — so-called electrical storm — frequently require antiarrhythmic drugs. Amiodarone is widely used for the treatment of electrical storm but is ineffective in some patients. Therefore, we investigated the efficacy of stepwise administration of nifekalant, a pure potassium channel blocker, and mexiletine for electrical storm. Methods This study included 44 patients with repetitive ventricular tachyarrhythmias who received stepwise therapy with nifekalant and mexiletine for electrical storm. Nifekalant was initially administered, and mexiletine was subsequently added if nifekalant failed to control ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Results Nifekalant completely suppressed recurrences of ventricular arrhythmias in 28 patients (64%), including 6 patients in whom oral amiodarone failed to control arrhythmias. In 9 of 16 patients in whom nifekalant was partially effective but failed to suppress ventricular arrhythmias, mexiletine was added. The addition of mexiletine prevented recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in 5 of these 9 patients (56%). There was no death associated with electrical storm. In total, the stepwise treatment with nifekalant and mexiletine was effective in preventing ventricular tachyarrhythmias in 33 of 44 patients (75%). There was no difference in cycle length of the ventricular tachycardia, QRS interval, QT interval, or left ventricular ejection fraction between patients who responded to antiarrhythmic drugs and those who did not. During follow-up, 8 patients had repetitive ventricular tachyarrhythmia recurrences, and the stepwise treatment was effective in 6 of these 8 patients (75%). Conclusions The stepwise treatment with nifekalant and mexiletine was highly effective in the suppression of electrical storm.