Loading…

Routine use of chest radiographs in the post-operative management of pectus bar removal: necessity or futility

Background While there is literature on techniques for pectus bar removal, there are limited reports on post-operative management. This can include obtaining a postoperative chest radiograph (CXR) despite the minimal risk of associated intra-thoracic complications. This is a review of our experience...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pediatric surgery international 2017-05, Vol.33 (5), p.619-622
Main Authors: Poola, Ashwini Suresh, Rentea, Rebecca M., Weaver, Katrina L., St. Peter, Shawn David
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-f21d299a41769d1837c01f5b471a003428c7db336eb725ff46acdb05ca94b4863
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-f21d299a41769d1837c01f5b471a003428c7db336eb725ff46acdb05ca94b4863
container_end_page 622
container_issue 5
container_start_page 619
container_title Pediatric surgery international
container_volume 33
creator Poola, Ashwini Suresh
Rentea, Rebecca M.
Weaver, Katrina L.
St. Peter, Shawn David
description Background While there is literature on techniques for pectus bar removal, there are limited reports on post-operative management. This can include obtaining a postoperative chest radiograph (CXR) despite the minimal risk of associated intra-thoracic complications. This is a review of our experience with bar removal and lack of routine post-operative CXR. Methods A single institution retrospective chart review was performed from 2000 to 2015. Patients who underwent a pectus bar removal procedure were included. We assessed operative timing of bar placement and removal, procedure length, intra-operative and post-operative complications and post-operative CXR findings, specifically the rate of pneumothoraces. Results 450 patients were identified in this study. Median duration of bar placement prior to removal was 35 months (interquartile range 30 and 36 months). Sixtey-four patients obtained a post-operative CXR. Of these, only one (58%) film revealed a pneumothorax; this was not drained. A CXR was not obtained in 386 (86%) patients with no immediate or delayed complications from this practice. Median follow-up time for all patients was 11 months (interquartile range 7.5–17 months). Discussion The risk for a clinically relevant pneumothorax is minimal following bar removal. This suggests that not obtaining routine imaging following bar removal may be a safe practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00383-017-4057-8
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1874783556</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4321766117</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-f21d299a41769d1837c01f5b471a003428c7db336eb725ff46acdb05ca94b4863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFL5TAUhYOM6Bv1B7iRwGzcZEyatEncDaLOgCCIrkOa3r5XaZOapIL_3jyeyjAw2SRwv3Nu7j0InTL6k1EqLxKlXHFCmSSC1pKoPbRigkuiFePf0KoUNKG8Vofoe0rPlFLFG32ADitVNZRptkL-ISx58ICXBDj02G0gZRxtN4R1tPMm4cHjvAE8h5RJmCHaPLwCnqy3a5jA561qBpeXhFsbcYQpvNrxEntwkNKQ33CIuC9NxvI-Rvu9HROcfNxH6Onm-vHqN7m7v_1z9euOOC6rTPqKdZXWVjDZ6I4pLh1lfd0KyWyZWVTKya7lvIFWVnXfi8a6rqW1s1q0QjX8CJ3vfOcYXpYykpmG5GAcrYewJMOUFFLxut6iP_5Bn8MSffldocqRNdeyUGxHuRhSitCbOQ6TjW-GUbMNw-zCMGXnZhuGUUVz9uG8tBN0X4rP7Reg2gGplPwa4l-t_-v6DuEQlQU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1888875397</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Routine use of chest radiographs in the post-operative management of pectus bar removal: necessity or futility</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Poola, Ashwini Suresh ; Rentea, Rebecca M. ; Weaver, Katrina L. ; St. Peter, Shawn David</creator><creatorcontrib>Poola, Ashwini Suresh ; Rentea, Rebecca M. ; Weaver, Katrina L. ; St. Peter, Shawn David</creatorcontrib><description>Background While there is literature on techniques for pectus bar removal, there are limited reports on post-operative management. This can include obtaining a postoperative chest radiograph (CXR) despite the minimal risk of associated intra-thoracic complications. This is a review of our experience with bar removal and lack of routine post-operative CXR. Methods A single institution retrospective chart review was performed from 2000 to 2015. Patients who underwent a pectus bar removal procedure were included. We assessed operative timing of bar placement and removal, procedure length, intra-operative and post-operative complications and post-operative CXR findings, specifically the rate of pneumothoraces. Results 450 patients were identified in this study. Median duration of bar placement prior to removal was 35 months (interquartile range 30 and 36 months). Sixtey-four patients obtained a post-operative CXR. Of these, only one (58%) film revealed a pneumothorax; this was not drained. A CXR was not obtained in 386 (86%) patients with no immediate or delayed complications from this practice. Median follow-up time for all patients was 11 months (interquartile range 7.5–17 months). Discussion The risk for a clinically relevant pneumothorax is minimal following bar removal. This suggests that not obtaining routine imaging following bar removal may be a safe practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0179-0358</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1437-9813</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00383-017-4057-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28260191</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Funnel Chest - complications ; Funnel Chest - diagnostic imaging ; Funnel Chest - surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Operative Time ; Original Article ; Pediatric Surgery ; Pediatrics ; Pneumothorax - complications ; Pneumothorax - diagnostic imaging ; Postoperative Care - methods ; Postoperative Complications - diagnostic imaging ; Radiography, Thoracic ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Pediatric surgery international, 2017-05, Vol.33 (5), p.619-622</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017</rights><rights>Pediatric Surgery International is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-f21d299a41769d1837c01f5b471a003428c7db336eb725ff46acdb05ca94b4863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-f21d299a41769d1837c01f5b471a003428c7db336eb725ff46acdb05ca94b4863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28260191$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Poola, Ashwini Suresh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rentea, Rebecca M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Katrina L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>St. Peter, Shawn David</creatorcontrib><title>Routine use of chest radiographs in the post-operative management of pectus bar removal: necessity or futility</title><title>Pediatric surgery international</title><addtitle>Pediatr Surg Int</addtitle><addtitle>Pediatr Surg Int</addtitle><description>Background While there is literature on techniques for pectus bar removal, there are limited reports on post-operative management. This can include obtaining a postoperative chest radiograph (CXR) despite the minimal risk of associated intra-thoracic complications. This is a review of our experience with bar removal and lack of routine post-operative CXR. Methods A single institution retrospective chart review was performed from 2000 to 2015. Patients who underwent a pectus bar removal procedure were included. We assessed operative timing of bar placement and removal, procedure length, intra-operative and post-operative complications and post-operative CXR findings, specifically the rate of pneumothoraces. Results 450 patients were identified in this study. Median duration of bar placement prior to removal was 35 months (interquartile range 30 and 36 months). Sixtey-four patients obtained a post-operative CXR. Of these, only one (58%) film revealed a pneumothorax; this was not drained. A CXR was not obtained in 386 (86%) patients with no immediate or delayed complications from this practice. Median follow-up time for all patients was 11 months (interquartile range 7.5–17 months). Discussion The risk for a clinically relevant pneumothorax is minimal following bar removal. This suggests that not obtaining routine imaging following bar removal may be a safe practice.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Funnel Chest - complications</subject><subject>Funnel Chest - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Funnel Chest - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Operative Time</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pediatric Surgery</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Pneumothorax - complications</subject><subject>Pneumothorax - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Postoperative Care - methods</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Radiography, Thoracic</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0179-0358</issn><issn>1437-9813</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kUFL5TAUhYOM6Bv1B7iRwGzcZEyatEncDaLOgCCIrkOa3r5XaZOapIL_3jyeyjAw2SRwv3Nu7j0InTL6k1EqLxKlXHFCmSSC1pKoPbRigkuiFePf0KoUNKG8Vofoe0rPlFLFG32ADitVNZRptkL-ISx58ICXBDj02G0gZRxtN4R1tPMm4cHjvAE8h5RJmCHaPLwCnqy3a5jA561qBpeXhFsbcYQpvNrxEntwkNKQ33CIuC9NxvI-Rvu9HROcfNxH6Onm-vHqN7m7v_1z9euOOC6rTPqKdZXWVjDZ6I4pLh1lfd0KyWyZWVTKya7lvIFWVnXfi8a6rqW1s1q0QjX8CJ3vfOcYXpYykpmG5GAcrYewJMOUFFLxut6iP_5Bn8MSffldocqRNdeyUGxHuRhSitCbOQ6TjW-GUbMNw-zCMGXnZhuGUUVz9uG8tBN0X4rP7Reg2gGplPwa4l-t_-v6DuEQlQU</recordid><startdate>20170501</startdate><enddate>20170501</enddate><creator>Poola, Ashwini Suresh</creator><creator>Rentea, Rebecca M.</creator><creator>Weaver, Katrina L.</creator><creator>St. Peter, Shawn David</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170501</creationdate><title>Routine use of chest radiographs in the post-operative management of pectus bar removal: necessity or futility</title><author>Poola, Ashwini Suresh ; Rentea, Rebecca M. ; Weaver, Katrina L. ; St. Peter, Shawn David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-f21d299a41769d1837c01f5b471a003428c7db336eb725ff46acdb05ca94b4863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Funnel Chest - complications</topic><topic>Funnel Chest - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Funnel Chest - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Operative Time</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pediatric Surgery</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Pneumothorax - complications</topic><topic>Pneumothorax - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Postoperative Care - methods</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Radiography, Thoracic</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Poola, Ashwini Suresh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rentea, Rebecca M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Katrina L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>St. Peter, Shawn David</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pediatric surgery international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Poola, Ashwini Suresh</au><au>Rentea, Rebecca M.</au><au>Weaver, Katrina L.</au><au>St. Peter, Shawn David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Routine use of chest radiographs in the post-operative management of pectus bar removal: necessity or futility</atitle><jtitle>Pediatric surgery international</jtitle><stitle>Pediatr Surg Int</stitle><addtitle>Pediatr Surg Int</addtitle><date>2017-05-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>619</spage><epage>622</epage><pages>619-622</pages><issn>0179-0358</issn><eissn>1437-9813</eissn><abstract>Background While there is literature on techniques for pectus bar removal, there are limited reports on post-operative management. This can include obtaining a postoperative chest radiograph (CXR) despite the minimal risk of associated intra-thoracic complications. This is a review of our experience with bar removal and lack of routine post-operative CXR. Methods A single institution retrospective chart review was performed from 2000 to 2015. Patients who underwent a pectus bar removal procedure were included. We assessed operative timing of bar placement and removal, procedure length, intra-operative and post-operative complications and post-operative CXR findings, specifically the rate of pneumothoraces. Results 450 patients were identified in this study. Median duration of bar placement prior to removal was 35 months (interquartile range 30 and 36 months). Sixtey-four patients obtained a post-operative CXR. Of these, only one (58%) film revealed a pneumothorax; this was not drained. A CXR was not obtained in 386 (86%) patients with no immediate or delayed complications from this practice. Median follow-up time for all patients was 11 months (interquartile range 7.5–17 months). Discussion The risk for a clinically relevant pneumothorax is minimal following bar removal. This suggests that not obtaining routine imaging following bar removal may be a safe practice.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>28260191</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00383-017-4057-8</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0179-0358
ispartof Pediatric surgery international, 2017-05, Vol.33 (5), p.619-622
issn 0179-0358
1437-9813
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1874783556
source Springer Nature
subjects Adolescent
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Funnel Chest - complications
Funnel Chest - diagnostic imaging
Funnel Chest - surgery
Humans
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Operative Time
Original Article
Pediatric Surgery
Pediatrics
Pneumothorax - complications
Pneumothorax - diagnostic imaging
Postoperative Care - methods
Postoperative Complications - diagnostic imaging
Radiography, Thoracic
Retrospective Studies
Surgery
Time Factors
title Routine use of chest radiographs in the post-operative management of pectus bar removal: necessity or futility
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T22%3A02%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Routine%20use%20of%20chest%20radiographs%20in%20the%20post-operative%20management%20of%20pectus%20bar%20removal:%20necessity%20or%20futility&rft.jtitle=Pediatric%20surgery%20international&rft.au=Poola,%20Ashwini%20Suresh&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=619&rft.epage=622&rft.pages=619-622&rft.issn=0179-0358&rft.eissn=1437-9813&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00383-017-4057-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4321766117%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-f21d299a41769d1837c01f5b471a003428c7db336eb725ff46acdb05ca94b4863%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1888875397&rft_id=info:pmid/28260191&rfr_iscdi=true