Loading…
Routine use of chest radiographs in the post-operative management of pectus bar removal: necessity or futility
Background While there is literature on techniques for pectus bar removal, there are limited reports on post-operative management. This can include obtaining a postoperative chest radiograph (CXR) despite the minimal risk of associated intra-thoracic complications. This is a review of our experience...
Saved in:
Published in: | Pediatric surgery international 2017-05, Vol.33 (5), p.619-622 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-f21d299a41769d1837c01f5b471a003428c7db336eb725ff46acdb05ca94b4863 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-f21d299a41769d1837c01f5b471a003428c7db336eb725ff46acdb05ca94b4863 |
container_end_page | 622 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 619 |
container_title | Pediatric surgery international |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Poola, Ashwini Suresh Rentea, Rebecca M. Weaver, Katrina L. St. Peter, Shawn David |
description | Background
While there is literature on techniques for pectus bar removal, there are limited reports on post-operative management. This can include obtaining a postoperative chest radiograph (CXR) despite the minimal risk of associated intra-thoracic complications. This is a review of our experience with bar removal and lack of routine post-operative CXR.
Methods
A single institution retrospective chart review was performed from 2000 to 2015. Patients who underwent a pectus bar removal procedure were included. We assessed operative timing of bar placement and removal, procedure length, intra-operative and post-operative complications and post-operative CXR findings, specifically the rate of pneumothoraces.
Results
450 patients were identified in this study. Median duration of bar placement prior to removal was 35 months (interquartile range 30 and 36 months). Sixtey-four patients obtained a post-operative CXR. Of these, only one (58%) film revealed a pneumothorax; this was not drained. A CXR was not obtained in 386 (86%) patients with no immediate or delayed complications from this practice. Median follow-up time for all patients was 11 months (interquartile range 7.5–17 months).
Discussion
The risk for a clinically relevant pneumothorax is minimal following bar removal. This suggests that not obtaining routine imaging following bar removal may be a safe practice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00383-017-4057-8 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1874783556</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4321766117</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-f21d299a41769d1837c01f5b471a003428c7db336eb725ff46acdb05ca94b4863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFL5TAUhYOM6Bv1B7iRwGzcZEyatEncDaLOgCCIrkOa3r5XaZOapIL_3jyeyjAw2SRwv3Nu7j0InTL6k1EqLxKlXHFCmSSC1pKoPbRigkuiFePf0KoUNKG8Vofoe0rPlFLFG32ADitVNZRptkL-ISx58ICXBDj02G0gZRxtN4R1tPMm4cHjvAE8h5RJmCHaPLwCnqy3a5jA561qBpeXhFsbcYQpvNrxEntwkNKQ33CIuC9NxvI-Rvu9HROcfNxH6Onm-vHqN7m7v_1z9euOOC6rTPqKdZXWVjDZ6I4pLh1lfd0KyWyZWVTKya7lvIFWVnXfi8a6rqW1s1q0QjX8CJ3vfOcYXpYykpmG5GAcrYewJMOUFFLxut6iP_5Bn8MSffldocqRNdeyUGxHuRhSitCbOQ6TjW-GUbMNw-zCMGXnZhuGUUVz9uG8tBN0X4rP7Reg2gGplPwa4l-t_-v6DuEQlQU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1888875397</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Routine use of chest radiographs in the post-operative management of pectus bar removal: necessity or futility</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Poola, Ashwini Suresh ; Rentea, Rebecca M. ; Weaver, Katrina L. ; St. Peter, Shawn David</creator><creatorcontrib>Poola, Ashwini Suresh ; Rentea, Rebecca M. ; Weaver, Katrina L. ; St. Peter, Shawn David</creatorcontrib><description>Background
While there is literature on techniques for pectus bar removal, there are limited reports on post-operative management. This can include obtaining a postoperative chest radiograph (CXR) despite the minimal risk of associated intra-thoracic complications. This is a review of our experience with bar removal and lack of routine post-operative CXR.
Methods
A single institution retrospective chart review was performed from 2000 to 2015. Patients who underwent a pectus bar removal procedure were included. We assessed operative timing of bar placement and removal, procedure length, intra-operative and post-operative complications and post-operative CXR findings, specifically the rate of pneumothoraces.
Results
450 patients were identified in this study. Median duration of bar placement prior to removal was 35 months (interquartile range 30 and 36 months). Sixtey-four patients obtained a post-operative CXR. Of these, only one (58%) film revealed a pneumothorax; this was not drained. A CXR was not obtained in 386 (86%) patients with no immediate or delayed complications from this practice. Median follow-up time for all patients was 11 months (interquartile range 7.5–17 months).
Discussion
The risk for a clinically relevant pneumothorax is minimal following bar removal. This suggests that not obtaining routine imaging following bar removal may be a safe practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0179-0358</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1437-9813</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00383-017-4057-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28260191</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Funnel Chest - complications ; Funnel Chest - diagnostic imaging ; Funnel Chest - surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Operative Time ; Original Article ; Pediatric Surgery ; Pediatrics ; Pneumothorax - complications ; Pneumothorax - diagnostic imaging ; Postoperative Care - methods ; Postoperative Complications - diagnostic imaging ; Radiography, Thoracic ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Pediatric surgery international, 2017-05, Vol.33 (5), p.619-622</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017</rights><rights>Pediatric Surgery International is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-f21d299a41769d1837c01f5b471a003428c7db336eb725ff46acdb05ca94b4863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-f21d299a41769d1837c01f5b471a003428c7db336eb725ff46acdb05ca94b4863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28260191$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Poola, Ashwini Suresh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rentea, Rebecca M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Katrina L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>St. Peter, Shawn David</creatorcontrib><title>Routine use of chest radiographs in the post-operative management of pectus bar removal: necessity or futility</title><title>Pediatric surgery international</title><addtitle>Pediatr Surg Int</addtitle><addtitle>Pediatr Surg Int</addtitle><description>Background
While there is literature on techniques for pectus bar removal, there are limited reports on post-operative management. This can include obtaining a postoperative chest radiograph (CXR) despite the minimal risk of associated intra-thoracic complications. This is a review of our experience with bar removal and lack of routine post-operative CXR.
Methods
A single institution retrospective chart review was performed from 2000 to 2015. Patients who underwent a pectus bar removal procedure were included. We assessed operative timing of bar placement and removal, procedure length, intra-operative and post-operative complications and post-operative CXR findings, specifically the rate of pneumothoraces.
Results
450 patients were identified in this study. Median duration of bar placement prior to removal was 35 months (interquartile range 30 and 36 months). Sixtey-four patients obtained a post-operative CXR. Of these, only one (58%) film revealed a pneumothorax; this was not drained. A CXR was not obtained in 386 (86%) patients with no immediate or delayed complications from this practice. Median follow-up time for all patients was 11 months (interquartile range 7.5–17 months).
Discussion
The risk for a clinically relevant pneumothorax is minimal following bar removal. This suggests that not obtaining routine imaging following bar removal may be a safe practice.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Funnel Chest - complications</subject><subject>Funnel Chest - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Funnel Chest - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Operative Time</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pediatric Surgery</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Pneumothorax - complications</subject><subject>Pneumothorax - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Postoperative Care - methods</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Radiography, Thoracic</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0179-0358</issn><issn>1437-9813</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kUFL5TAUhYOM6Bv1B7iRwGzcZEyatEncDaLOgCCIrkOa3r5XaZOapIL_3jyeyjAw2SRwv3Nu7j0InTL6k1EqLxKlXHFCmSSC1pKoPbRigkuiFePf0KoUNKG8Vofoe0rPlFLFG32ADitVNZRptkL-ISx58ICXBDj02G0gZRxtN4R1tPMm4cHjvAE8h5RJmCHaPLwCnqy3a5jA561qBpeXhFsbcYQpvNrxEntwkNKQ33CIuC9NxvI-Rvu9HROcfNxH6Onm-vHqN7m7v_1z9euOOC6rTPqKdZXWVjDZ6I4pLh1lfd0KyWyZWVTKya7lvIFWVnXfi8a6rqW1s1q0QjX8CJ3vfOcYXpYykpmG5GAcrYewJMOUFFLxut6iP_5Bn8MSffldocqRNdeyUGxHuRhSitCbOQ6TjW-GUbMNw-zCMGXnZhuGUUVz9uG8tBN0X4rP7Reg2gGplPwa4l-t_-v6DuEQlQU</recordid><startdate>20170501</startdate><enddate>20170501</enddate><creator>Poola, Ashwini Suresh</creator><creator>Rentea, Rebecca M.</creator><creator>Weaver, Katrina L.</creator><creator>St. Peter, Shawn David</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170501</creationdate><title>Routine use of chest radiographs in the post-operative management of pectus bar removal: necessity or futility</title><author>Poola, Ashwini Suresh ; Rentea, Rebecca M. ; Weaver, Katrina L. ; St. Peter, Shawn David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-f21d299a41769d1837c01f5b471a003428c7db336eb725ff46acdb05ca94b4863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Funnel Chest - complications</topic><topic>Funnel Chest - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Funnel Chest - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Operative Time</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pediatric Surgery</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Pneumothorax - complications</topic><topic>Pneumothorax - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Postoperative Care - methods</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Radiography, Thoracic</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Poola, Ashwini Suresh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rentea, Rebecca M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Katrina L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>St. Peter, Shawn David</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pediatric surgery international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Poola, Ashwini Suresh</au><au>Rentea, Rebecca M.</au><au>Weaver, Katrina L.</au><au>St. Peter, Shawn David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Routine use of chest radiographs in the post-operative management of pectus bar removal: necessity or futility</atitle><jtitle>Pediatric surgery international</jtitle><stitle>Pediatr Surg Int</stitle><addtitle>Pediatr Surg Int</addtitle><date>2017-05-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>619</spage><epage>622</epage><pages>619-622</pages><issn>0179-0358</issn><eissn>1437-9813</eissn><abstract>Background
While there is literature on techniques for pectus bar removal, there are limited reports on post-operative management. This can include obtaining a postoperative chest radiograph (CXR) despite the minimal risk of associated intra-thoracic complications. This is a review of our experience with bar removal and lack of routine post-operative CXR.
Methods
A single institution retrospective chart review was performed from 2000 to 2015. Patients who underwent a pectus bar removal procedure were included. We assessed operative timing of bar placement and removal, procedure length, intra-operative and post-operative complications and post-operative CXR findings, specifically the rate of pneumothoraces.
Results
450 patients were identified in this study. Median duration of bar placement prior to removal was 35 months (interquartile range 30 and 36 months). Sixtey-four patients obtained a post-operative CXR. Of these, only one (58%) film revealed a pneumothorax; this was not drained. A CXR was not obtained in 386 (86%) patients with no immediate or delayed complications from this practice. Median follow-up time for all patients was 11 months (interquartile range 7.5–17 months).
Discussion
The risk for a clinically relevant pneumothorax is minimal following bar removal. This suggests that not obtaining routine imaging following bar removal may be a safe practice.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>28260191</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00383-017-4057-8</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0179-0358 |
ispartof | Pediatric surgery international, 2017-05, Vol.33 (5), p.619-622 |
issn | 0179-0358 1437-9813 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1874783556 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Adolescent Female Follow-Up Studies Funnel Chest - complications Funnel Chest - diagnostic imaging Funnel Chest - surgery Humans Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Operative Time Original Article Pediatric Surgery Pediatrics Pneumothorax - complications Pneumothorax - diagnostic imaging Postoperative Care - methods Postoperative Complications - diagnostic imaging Radiography, Thoracic Retrospective Studies Surgery Time Factors |
title | Routine use of chest radiographs in the post-operative management of pectus bar removal: necessity or futility |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T22%3A02%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Routine%20use%20of%20chest%20radiographs%20in%20the%20post-operative%20management%20of%20pectus%20bar%20removal:%20necessity%20or%20futility&rft.jtitle=Pediatric%20surgery%20international&rft.au=Poola,%20Ashwini%20Suresh&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=619&rft.epage=622&rft.pages=619-622&rft.issn=0179-0358&rft.eissn=1437-9813&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00383-017-4057-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4321766117%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-f21d299a41769d1837c01f5b471a003428c7db336eb725ff46acdb05ca94b4863%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1888875397&rft_id=info:pmid/28260191&rfr_iscdi=true |