Calciphylaxis: Comparison of radiologic imaging and histopathology

Background The current gold standard for diagnosis of calciphylaxis is a skin biopsy specimen demonstrating calcification of small-caliber arteries or arterioles. Objective The aim of this study is to compare diameters of calcified vessels seen in skin biopsy specimens and radiology images of patien...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2017-08, Vol.77 (2), p.241-246.e3
Main Authors: Halasz, Charles L., MD, Munger, David P., MD, Frimmer, Heather, MD, Dicorato, Michael, MD, Wainwright, Sandra, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Aged
Arterioles - diagnostic imaging
Arterioles - pathology
calcific uremic arteriolopathy
calciphylaxis
Calciphylaxis - complications
Calciphylaxis - diagnostic imaging
Calciphylaxis - pathology
Dermatology
Female
Humans
Male
Mammography
Middle Aged
radiologic imaging
Retrospective Studies
Skin Diseases - etiology
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background The current gold standard for diagnosis of calciphylaxis is a skin biopsy specimen demonstrating calcification of small-caliber arteries or arterioles. Objective The aim of this study is to compare diameters of calcified vessels seen in skin biopsy specimens and radiology images of patients with calciphylaxis. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of patients with known calciphylaxis from 2009 to 2016 at a community hospital who had both skin biopsy specimens and radiology images taken as part of their routine care. Vascular calcification was compared in skin biopsy specimens and radiology images. Results Seven patients were identified. Small-vessel calcification as fine as 0.1 to 0.3 mm was identified on plain films in 3 patients; 0.1 to 0.2 mm by mammography in 3 patients, and 0.1 to 0.2 mm by computed tomography imaging in 1 patient, nearly as fine a resolution as on histopathology. Limitations This was a single-center study with limited sample size. Conclusion Radiologic imaging might enable more rapid diagnosis of calciphylaxis when skin biopsy specimen is pending or not available.
ISSN:0190-9622
1097-6787
DOI:10.1016/j.jaad.2017.01.040