Impact damage tolerance of thermoset composites reinforced with hybrid commingled yarns

This paper examines the potential of low-cost thermoplastic fibres in improving the impact damage resistance and damage tolerance of thermoset (glass-epoxy) composites. Polypropylene (PP) fibres, commodity fibres without any surface modifications, have been incorporated at tow-scale with the aid of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Composites. Part B, Engineering Engineering, 2016-04, Vol.91, p.522-538
Main Authors: Selver, Erdem, Potluri, Prasad, Hogg, Paul, Soutis, Costas
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
A. Commingled yarn
A. Fabrics/textiles
A. Hybrid
B. Damage tolerance
B. Impact behaviour
Compressive strength
Damage
Fibers
Fibres
Impact damage
Laminates
Low energy
Polypropylenes
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper examines the potential of low-cost thermoplastic fibres in improving the impact damage resistance and damage tolerance of thermoset (glass-epoxy) composites. Polypropylene (PP) fibres, commodity fibres without any surface modifications, have been incorporated at tow-scale with the aid of air jet commingling process. Glass-PP hybrid yarns with varying proportion of PP fibres (0–35%) are converted into several non-crimp cross-ply laminates and a plain-woven laminate. Damage resistance in terms of damage area and depth are assessed for low energy (20–50 J) as well as high energy (500 J) drop-weight impacts; damage tolerance is assessed through Compression after Impact (CAI) tests. Overall density of the composite laminate has reduced by 16% due to the introduction of PP fibres; at the same time total absorbed energy has increased by 22% during a high velocity impact test due to a toughing mechanism by PP fibres. Non-crimp laminates absorbed more energy at low velocity impacts in comparison to woven laminates, possibly due to extensive tow-level delaminations. On the other hand, a much larger dent depth was observed in the woven laminate after low energy impact. Compression after Impact (CAI) tests indicated that woven laminates retained 83% of compressive strength while non-crimp laminates retained 50–60%, depending on proportion of thermoplastic fibres, and standard glass fibre laminates retain around 45%. Fibre damage has been significantly reduced during impact loading in case of hybrid laminates due to the cushioning effect offered by lower modulus PP fibres.
ISSN:1359-8368
1879-1069
DOI:10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.12.035